Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Legal Medicine 1/2012

01.01.2012 | Original Article

Journals publishing bio-medicolegal research in Europe

verfasst von: Rafael Boscolo-Berto, Guido Viel, Rossana Cecchi, Claudio Terranova, Susanna Vogliardi, Thomas Bajanowski, Santo Davide Ferrara

Erschienen in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Fragmentation of bio-medicolegal knowledge has led to a proliferation of ultra-specialised sub-disciplines and branches, often published in ‘field-oriented’ scientific journals.The aim of this work is to provide an in-depth analytical picture of bio-medicolegal sources of publication, within and outside the traditional conception of legal medicine. An extensive search of bio-medicolegal articles published in the last five and a half years was performed on the MEDLINE database according to MeSH terms combined with free-text protocols. We performed a systematic analysis of targeted journals after merging, selecting and categorising all retrieved records, taking into account data from the 2009 JCR Science Edition (released on June 2010); 1,037 different journals were identified, of which only 48 (4.6%) focus specifically on bio-medicolegal matters, and of which only seven (14.6%) have an impact factor (IF). Despite this apparent dispersion, 47% of articles were published in bio-medicolegal journals (BML), of which 70.2% were in journals with IF (BML-IF). Articles published in BML-IF journals (33% of total papers) reach almost 50%, mainly in “Forensic Science International”, “International Journal of Legal Medicine” and “Journal of Forensic Sciences”. Instead, publications in not specifically bio-medicolegal journals (Not BML-IF) are greatly scattered and even fragmented in about 650 journals.The sub-disciplines that appear most frequently in Not BML-IF rather than BML-IF journals are Forensic Psychiatry (48.2% vs. 5.1%), Criminology (37.1% vs. 8.3%), Malpractice (50.7% vs. 4.0%), Medical Law and Ethics (46.4% vs. 6.9%) and Clinical Forensic Medicine (39.5% vs. 21.3%). The proposed bibliometric analysis revealed the preference of Forensic Pathology, Criminalistics (Biological), Forensic Genetics, Forensic Anthropology and Forensic Entomology for journals traditionally considered pertinent to the medico-legal discipline, with a considerable dispersion involving Toxicology, Psychiatry, Criminology and Malpractice, which were published in less well-known journals. This dispersion could be reduced adapting specialised forensic sections and increasing the IF of forensic journals, in order to respond suitably to the present demand for visibility by bio-medicolegal scientists, clearly oriented towards enhancing the objective impact of their curricula and attempting to attract funding to their research projects.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbasi K, Butterfield M, Connor J, Delamothe T, Dutton S, Hadridge P, Horgan A, Smith J, Smith R, Walford E, Williamson A (2002) Four futures for scientific and medical publishing. BMJ 325:1472–1475PubMedCrossRef Abbasi K, Butterfield M, Connor J, Delamothe T, Dutton S, Hadridge P, Horgan A, Smith J, Smith R, Walford E, Williamson A (2002) Four futures for scientific and medical publishing. BMJ 325:1472–1475PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones AW (2007) The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor. Forensic Sci Int 165:115–128PubMedCrossRef Jones AW (2007) The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor. Forensic Sci Int 165:115–128PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrara SD, Bajanowski T, Cecchi R, Boscolo-Berto R, Viel G (2011) Bio-medicolegal scientific research in Europe: a comprehensive bibliometric overview. Int J Legal Med 125:393–402 Ferrara SD, Bajanowski T, Cecchi R, Boscolo-Berto R, Viel G (2011) Bio-medicolegal scientific research in Europe: a comprehensive bibliometric overview. Int J Legal Med 125:393–402
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrara SD, Bajanowski T, Cecchi R, Snenghi R, Case C, Viel G (2010) Bio-medicolegal guidelines and protocols: survey and future perspectives in Europe. Int J Legal Med 124:345–350PubMedCrossRef Ferrara SD, Bajanowski T, Cecchi R, Snenghi R, Case C, Viel G (2010) Bio-medicolegal guidelines and protocols: survey and future perspectives in Europe. Int J Legal Med 124:345–350PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrara SD, Pfeiffer H (2010) Unitariness, evidence and quality in bio-medicolegal sciences. Int J Legal Med 124:343–344PubMedCrossRef Ferrara SD, Pfeiffer H (2010) Unitariness, evidence and quality in bio-medicolegal sciences. Int J Legal Med 124:343–344PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones AW (2003) Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: what do the numbers really mean? Forensic Sci Int 133:1–8PubMedCrossRef Jones AW (2003) Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: what do the numbers really mean? Forensic Sci Int 133:1–8PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Viel G, Boscolo-Berto R, Cecchi R, Bajanowski T, Vieira ND, Ferrara SD (2011) Bio-medicolegal scientific research in Europe. A country-based analysis. Int J Legal Med 125:717–725PubMedCrossRef Viel G, Boscolo-Berto R, Cecchi R, Bajanowski T, Vieira ND, Ferrara SD (2011) Bio-medicolegal scientific research in Europe. A country-based analysis. Int J Legal Med 125:717–725PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Saukko P (2009) The role of international journals in legal/forensic medicine. Leg Med (Tokyo) 11(Suppl 1):S9–S12CrossRef Saukko P (2009) The role of international journals in legal/forensic medicine. Leg Med (Tokyo) 11(Suppl 1):S9–S12CrossRef
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams G (1998) Misleading, unscientific, and unjust: the United Kingdom's research assessment exercise. BMJ 316:1079–1082PubMedCrossRef Williams G (1998) Misleading, unscientific, and unjust: the United Kingdom's research assessment exercise. BMJ 316:1079–1082PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat D'Avolio LW, Farwell WR, Fiore LD (2010) Comparative effectiveness research and medical informatics. Am J Med 123:e32–e37PubMedCrossRef D'Avolio LW, Farwell WR, Fiore LD (2010) Comparative effectiveness research and medical informatics. Am J Med 123:e32–e37PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Vesilind PA (1992) Medicine, technology, and ethics: a historical perspective. J Invest Surg 5:171–178PubMedCrossRef Vesilind PA (1992) Medicine, technology, and ethics: a historical perspective. J Invest Surg 5:171–178PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KP, Schotland M, Bacchetti P, Bero LA (2002) Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA 287:2805–2808PubMedCrossRef Lee KP, Schotland M, Bacchetti P, Bero LA (2002) Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA 287:2805–2808PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Madea B, Saukko P (2007) Future in forensic medicine as an academic discipline-focussing on research. Forensic Sci Int 165:87–91PubMedCrossRef Madea B, Saukko P (2007) Future in forensic medicine as an academic discipline-focussing on research. Forensic Sci Int 165:87–91PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Falagas ME, Alexiou VG (2008) An analysis of trends in globalisation of origin of research published in major general medical journals. Int J Clin Pract 62:71–75PubMedCrossRef Falagas ME, Alexiou VG (2008) An analysis of trends in globalisation of origin of research published in major general medical journals. Int J Clin Pract 62:71–75PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wieland S, Dickersin K (2005) Selective exposure reporting and Medline indexing limited the search sensitivity for observational studies of the adverse effects of oral contraceptives. J Clin Epidemiol 58:560–567PubMedCrossRef Wieland S, Dickersin K (2005) Selective exposure reporting and Medline indexing limited the search sensitivity for observational studies of the adverse effects of oral contraceptives. J Clin Epidemiol 58:560–567PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Journals publishing bio-medicolegal research in Europe
verfasst von
Rafael Boscolo-Berto
Guido Viel
Rossana Cecchi
Claudio Terranova
Susanna Vogliardi
Thomas Bajanowski
Santo Davide Ferrara
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Journal of Legal Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0620-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

International Journal of Legal Medicine 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin