Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2019

09.11.2019 | Original Article

Journey for patients following ileostomy creation is not straightforward

verfasst von: Dedrick Kok Hong Chan, Jingyu Ng, Frederick Hong-Xiang Koh, Tianzhi Lim, Danson Yeo, Kok-Yang Tan, Ker-Kan Tan

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 12/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

An ileostomy is usually created to avert systemic sepsis in a patient with a tenuous anastomosis. However, what is often not reported are the numerous issues facing these patients subsequently, ranging from readmissions, non-reversal of the stoma, and complications from the closure. This study was performed to identify these issues among patients following creation of an ileostomy.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who had an ileostomy created from January 2011 to December 2016 at two institutions. Statistical analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with readmissions and ileostomy non-reversal.

Results

In total, 193 patients had an ileostomy created during the study period. Twenty-six (13.5%) patients developed stoma-related complications requiring readmission. The most common cause of readmission (9.3%) was due to dehydration and acute kidney injury secondary to high stoma output. One hundred thirty (67.4%) patients had their ileostomy reversed. On multivariate analysis, only stomas created during an ultra-low anterior resection were associated with reversal (OR 2.88 [95% CI, 1.24–6.68]; p = 0.014). Among the patients who underwent ileostomy reversal, seven (3.6%) patients developed complications from their ileostomy reversal. Four patients (2.1%) suffered from an anastomotic leak which required repeat surgical intervention with one mortality from the ensuing sepsis.

Conclusion

Almost half of the patients who had an Ileostomy had an undesirable outcome, including readmissions, non-reversal, and post-operative complications following closure. Patients need to be properly counselled about the risks involved prior to the index operation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lightner AL, Pemberton JH (2017) The role of temporary fecal diversion. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 30(3):178–183CrossRef Lightner AL, Pemberton JH (2017) The role of temporary fecal diversion. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 30(3):178–183CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Li L, Lau KS, Ramanathan V, Orcutt ST, Sansgiry S, Albo D, Berger DH, Anaya DA (2017) Ileostomy creation in colorectal cancer surgery: risk of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. J Surg Res 210:204–212CrossRef Li L, Lau KS, Ramanathan V, Orcutt ST, Sansgiry S, Albo D, Berger DH, Anaya DA (2017) Ileostomy creation in colorectal cancer surgery: risk of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. J Surg Res 210:204–212CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Löb S, Luetkens K, Krajinovic K, Wiegering A, Germer CT, Seyfried F (2018) Impact of surgical proficiency levels on postoperative morbidity: a single centre analysis of 558 ileostomy reversals. Int J Color Dis 33(5):601–608CrossRef Löb S, Luetkens K, Krajinovic K, Wiegering A, Germer CT, Seyfried F (2018) Impact of surgical proficiency levels on postoperative morbidity: a single centre analysis of 558 ileostomy reversals. Int J Color Dis 33(5):601–608CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yilmaz E, Çelebi D, Kaya Y, Baydur H (2017) A descriptive, cross-sectional study to assess quality of life and sexuality in Turkish patients with a colostomy. Ostomy Wound Manage 63(8):22–29CrossRef Yilmaz E, Çelebi D, Kaya Y, Baydur H (2017) A descriptive, cross-sectional study to assess quality of life and sexuality in Turkish patients with a colostomy. Ostomy Wound Manage 63(8):22–29CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, Wolff S, Koeckerling F, Lippert H, Working Group ‘Colon/Rectum Carcinoma’ (2005) Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92(9):1137–1142CrossRef Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, Wolff S, Koeckerling F, Lippert H, Working Group ‘Colon/Rectum Carcinoma’ (2005) Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92(9):1137–1142CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Paquette IM, Solan P, Rafferty JF, Ferguson MA, Davis BR (2013) Readmission for dehydration or renal failure after ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum 56(8):974–979CrossRef Paquette IM, Solan P, Rafferty JF, Ferguson MA, Davis BR (2013) Readmission for dehydration or renal failure after ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum 56(8):974–979CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Messaris E, Sehgal R, Deiling S, Koltun WA, Stewart D, McKenna K, Poritz LS (2012) Dehydration is the most common indication for readmission after diverting ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum 55(2):175–180CrossRef Messaris E, Sehgal R, Deiling S, Koltun WA, Stewart D, McKenna K, Poritz LS (2012) Dehydration is the most common indication for readmission after diverting ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum 55(2):175–180CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Li W, Stocchi L, Cherla D, Liu G, Agostinelli A, Delaney CP, Steele SR, Gorgun E (2017) Factors associated with hospital readmission following diverting ileostomy creation. Tech Coloproctol 21(8):641–648CrossRef Li W, Stocchi L, Cherla D, Liu G, Agostinelli A, Delaney CP, Steele SR, Gorgun E (2017) Factors associated with hospital readmission following diverting ileostomy creation. Tech Coloproctol 21(8):641–648CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunnells DJ Jr, Wood LN, Goss L, Morris MS, Kennedy GD, Cannon JA, Chu DI (2018) Racial disparities after stoma construction exist in time to closure after 1 year but not in overall stoma reversal rates. J Gastrointest Surg 22(2):250–258CrossRef Gunnells DJ Jr, Wood LN, Goss L, Morris MS, Kennedy GD, Cannon JA, Chu DI (2018) Racial disparities after stoma construction exist in time to closure after 1 year but not in overall stoma reversal rates. J Gastrointest Surg 22(2):250–258CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Color Dis 24(6):711–723CrossRef Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Color Dis 24(6):711–723CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhama AR, Batool F, Collins SD, Ferraro J, Cleary RK (2017) Risk factors for postoperative complications following diverting loop ileostomy takedown. J Gastrointest Surg 21(12):2048–2055CrossRef Bhama AR, Batool F, Collins SD, Ferraro J, Cleary RK (2017) Risk factors for postoperative complications following diverting loop ileostomy takedown. J Gastrointest Surg 21(12):2048–2055CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Luglio G, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Cima RR, Nelson H (2011) Loop ileostomy reversal after colon and rectal surgery: a single institutional 5-year experience in 944 patients. Arch Surg 146(10):1191–1196CrossRef Luglio G, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Cima RR, Nelson H (2011) Loop ileostomy reversal after colon and rectal surgery: a single institutional 5-year experience in 944 patients. Arch Surg 146(10):1191–1196CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Faunø L, Rasmussen C, Sloth KK, Sloth AM, Tøttrup A (2012) Low complication rate after stoma closure. Consultants attended 90% of the operations. Color Dis 14(8):e499–e505CrossRef Faunø L, Rasmussen C, Sloth KK, Sloth AM, Tøttrup A (2012) Low complication rate after stoma closure. Consultants attended 90% of the operations. Color Dis 14(8):e499–e505CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Journey for patients following ileostomy creation is not straightforward
verfasst von
Dedrick Kok Hong Chan
Jingyu Ng
Frederick Hong-Xiang Koh
Tianzhi Lim
Danson Yeo
Kok-Yang Tan
Ker-Kan Tan
Publikationsdatum
09.11.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 12/2019
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03428-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2019

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.