Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2020

02.12.2019 | Original Research

Knowledge and Perception of Breast Density, Screening Mammography, and Supplemental Screening: in Search of “Informed”

verfasst von: Karen E. Schifferdecker, PhD, MPH, Anna N. A. Tosteson, ScD, Celia Kaplan, Dr, PH, Karla Kerlikowske, MD, Diana S.M. Buist, PhD, MPH, Louise M. Henderson, PhD, Dianne Johnson, Jill Jaworski, Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti, Kelly Ehrlich, MS, Mary W. Marsh, MPH, Lisa Vu, MPH, Tracy Onega, PhD, MS, Karen J. Wernli, PhD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

As of 2019, 37 US states have breast density notification laws. No qualitative study to date has examined women’s perspectives about breast density in general or by states with and without notification laws.

Objective

Explore women’s knowledge and perceptions of breast density and experiences of breast cancer screening across three states with and without notification laws.

Design

Qualitative research design using four focus groups conducted in 2017.

Participants

Forty-seven women who had a recent normal mammogram and dense breasts in registry data obtained through the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Approach

Focus groups were 90 min, audio recorded, and transcribed for analysis. Data were analyzed using mixed deductive and inductive coding.

Key Results

Women reported variable knowledge levels of personal breast density and breast density in general, even among women living in states with a notification law. A number of women were aware of the difficulty of detecting cancer with dense breasts, but only one knew that density increased breast cancer risk. Across all states, very few women reported receiving information about breast density during healthcare visits beyond being encouraged to get supplemental imaging or to pay for new mammography technology (i.e., breast tomosynthesis). Women offered more imaging or different technology held strong convictions that these were “better,” even though knowledge of differences, effectiveness, or harms across technologies seemed limited. Women from all states expressed a strong desire for more information about breast density.

Conclusions

More research needs to be done to understand how the medical community can best assist women in making informed decisions related to breast density, mammography, and supplemental screening. Options to explore include improved breast density notifications and education materials about breast density, continued development of personalized risk information tools, strategies for providers to discuss evidence and options based on risk stratification, and shared decision-making.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Rommens JM, Vogt K, et al. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2005;6(11):826.CrossRef Boyd NF, Rommens JM, Vogt K, et al. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2005;6(11):826.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: A cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011;155(8):493–502.CrossRef Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: A cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011;155(8):493–502.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cappello NM. Decade of ‘normal’ mammography reports-The Happygram. J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10(12):903–908.CrossRef Cappello NM. Decade of ‘normal’ mammography reports-The Happygram. J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10(12):903–908.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kressin N, Gunn C, Battaglia T. Content, readability, and understandability of dense breast notifications by state. Jama. 2016;315(23):2624–2624. Kressin N, Gunn C, Battaglia T. Content, readability, and understandability of dense breast notifications by state. Jama. 2016;315(23):2624–2624.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dedoose Version 6.1.18, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. 2016. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. www.dedoose.com. Dedoose Version 6.1.18, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. 2016. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. www.​dedoose.​com.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. 2008. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.CrossRef Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. 2008. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Slanetz PJ, Freer PE, Birdwell RL. Breast-Density legislation — Practical considerations. N Engl J Med 2015;372(7):593–595.CrossRef Slanetz PJ, Freer PE, Birdwell RL. Breast-Density legislation — Practical considerations. N Engl J Med 2015;372(7):593–595.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Knowledge and Perception of Breast Density, Screening Mammography, and Supplemental Screening: in Search of “Informed”
verfasst von
Karen E. Schifferdecker, PhD, MPH
Anna N. A. Tosteson, ScD
Celia Kaplan, Dr, PH
Karla Kerlikowske, MD
Diana S.M. Buist, PhD, MPH
Louise M. Henderson, PhD
Dianne Johnson
Jill Jaworski
Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti
Kelly Ehrlich, MS
Mary W. Marsh, MPH
Lisa Vu, MPH
Tracy Onega, PhD, MS
Karen J. Wernli, PhD
Publikationsdatum
02.12.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05560-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.