Background
Methods
Study setting
Study design and participants
Study procedures
Statistical analysis
Results
Sociodemographic characteristics
Male respondents (N = 396) | Female respondents (N = 50) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All (N = 396) | Uncircumcised (n = 272) | Circumcised (n = 124) | p | All (N = 50) | Sexual partner uncircumcised (n = 34) | Sexual partner circumcised (n = 16) | p | |
Age | ||||||||
Mean(SD) | 26.5(6.8) | 26.7(6.8) | 26.1(6.8) | 0.390 | 28.4(7.8) | 28.3(8.1) | 28.6(7.4) | 0.890 |
Median(IQR) | 25(22–29) | 25(22–30) | 24(22–28) | 0.345 | 26.5(23–32) | 26.5(23–32) | 26(23.5–33.5) | 0.771 |
Location, n(%) | ||||||||
Rural | 178(45.0) | 133(48.9) | 45(36.3) | 0.019 | 25(50.0) | 16(47.1) | 9(56.3) | 0.544 |
Urban | 218(55.0) | 39(51.1) | 79(63.7) | 25(50.0) | 18(52.9) | 7(43.7) | ||
Marital status, n(%) | ||||||||
Married/consensual | 210(53.0) | 53(56.3) | 7(46.0) | 0.057 | 32(64.0) | 22(64.7) | 10(62.5) | 0.880 |
Unmarried | 186(47.0) | 19(43.8) | 67(54.0) | 18(36.0) | 12(35.3) | 6(37.5) | ||
Tribe, n(%) | ||||||||
Acholi | 343(86.6) | 244(89.7) | 99(79.8) | 0.003 | 42(84.0) | 30(88.2) | 12(75.0) | 0.331 |
Langi | 39(9.9) | 24(8.8) | 5(12.1) | 2(4.0) | 1(2.9) | 1(6.3) | ||
Other | 14(3.5) | 4(1.5) | 10(8.1) | 6(12.0) | 3(8.8) | 3(18.8) | ||
Religion, n(%) | ||||||||
Catholic | 273(68.9) | 191(70.2) | 82(66.1) | 0.357 | 32(64.0) | 23(67.7) | (56.3) | 0.466 |
Protestant | 76(19.2) | 53(19.5) | 23(18.6) | 13(26.0) | 9(26.5) | 4(25.0) | ||
Other | 47(11.9) | 28(10.3) | 19(15.3) | 5(10.0) | 2(5.9) | 3(18.8) | ||
Education, n(%) | ||||||||
None to primary | 108(27.3) | 91(33.5) | 17(13.7) | < 0.001 | 27(54.0) | 21(61.8) | 6(37.5) | 0.118 |
Secondary | 185(46.7) | 123(45.2) | 62(50.0) | 17(34.0) | 11(32.3) | 6(37.5) | ||
Tertiary/university | 103(26.0) | 58(21.3) | 45(36.3) | 6(12.0) | 2(5.9) | 4(25.0) | ||
Occupation, n(%) | ||||||||
Farming | 102(25.8) | 80(29.4) | 22(17.7) | 0.018 | 12(24.0) | 7(20.6) | 5(31.3) | 0.139 |
Trading | 82(20.7) | 60(22.1) | 22(17.7) | 21(42.0) | 18(52.9) | 3(18.8) | ||
Student | 62(15.7) | 8(14.0) | 24(19.4) | 3(6.0) | 1(2.9) | 2(12.5) | ||
Other | 104(26.3) | 61(22.4) | 43(34.7) | 9(18.0) | 5(14.7) | 4(25.0) | ||
Unemployed | 46(11.6) | 33(12.1) | 13(10.5) | 5(10.0) | 3(8.8) | 2(12.5) |
The association between men’s knowledge on VMMC and their circumcision status
Male respondents | Female respondents | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All (N = 396) | Uncircumcised (n = 272) | Circumcised (n = 124) | p | All (N = 50) | Sexual partner uncircumcised (n = 34) | Sexual partner circumcised (n = 16) | p | |
VMMC reduces a man’s risk of acquiring HIV, n(%) | ||||||||
Accept | 362(91.4) | 249(91.5) | 113(91.1) | 0.891 | 47(94.0) | 32(94.1) | 5(93.8) | 1.000 |
Fail to accept | 34(8.6) | 23(8.5) | 11(8.9) | 3(6.0) | 2(5.9) | 1(6.3) | ||
VMMC improves genital hygiene, n(%) | ||||||||
Accept | 377(95.2) | 257(94.5) | 120(96.8) | 0.449 | 49(98.0) | 33(97.1) | 16(100.0) | 1.000 |
Fail to accept | 19(4.8) | 15(5.5) | 4(3.2) | 1(2.0) | 1(2.9) | 0(0.0) | ||
VMMC reduces risk of STIs, n(%) | ||||||||
Accept | 317(80.0) | 215(79.0) | 102(82.3) | 0.458 | 35(70.0) | 23(67.7) | 2(75.0) | 0.746 |
Fail to accept | 79(20.0) | 57(21.0) | 22(22.7) | 15(30.0) | 11(32.4) | 4(25.0) | ||
VMMC reduces cervical cancer risk for female partner, n(%) | ||||||||
Accept | 29(7.3) | 22(8.1) | 7(5.6) | 0.387 | 7(14.0) | 3(8.8) | 4(25.0) | 0.190 |
Fail to accept | 367(92.7) | 250(91.9) | 117(94.4) | 43(86.0) | 31(91.2) | 12(75.0) | ||
VMMC involves removal of the foreskin, n(%) | ||||||||
Accept | 389(98.2) | 266(97.8) | 123(99.2) | 0.442 | 50(100.0) | 34(100.0) | 6(100.0) | – |
Fail to accept | 7(1.8) | 6(2.2) | 1(0.8) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | ||
VMMC differs from traditional circumcision, n(%) | ||||||||
Accept | 300(75.8) | 198(72.8) | 102(82.3) | 0.042 | 25(50.0) | 17(50.0) | 8(50.0) | 1.000 |
Fail to accept | 96(24.2) | 74(27.2) | 22(17.7) | 25(50.0) | 17(50.0) | 8(50.0) | ||
An injection is given for pain control before VMMC, n(%) | ||||||||
Accept | 378(95.5) | 257(94.5) | 121(97.6) | 0.203 | 40(80.0) | 25(73.5) | 15(93.7) | 0.138 |
Fail to accept | 18(4.5) | 15(5.5) | 3(2.4) | 10(20.0) | 9(26.5) | 1(6.3) | ||
Men normally bleed after VMMC, n(%) | ||||||||
Reject | 301(76.0) | 196(72.1) | 105(84.7) | 0.006 | 36(72.0) | 23(67.7) | 3(81.3) | 0.501 |
Fail to reject | 95(24.0) | 76(27.9) | 19(15.3) | 14(28.0) | 11(32.4) | 3(18.8) | ||
Tubes that carry sperm are cut during VMMC, n(%) | ||||||||
Reject | 360(90.9) | 45(90.1) | 115(92.7) | 0.392 | 42(84.0) | 7(79.4) | 15(93.7) | 0.409 |
Fail to reject | 36(9.1) | 27(9.9) | 9(7.3) | 8(16.0) | 7(20.6) | 1(6.3) | ||
VMMC can make a man immune to acquiring HIV, n(%) | ||||||||
Reject | 359(90.7) | 48(91.2) | 111(89.5) | 0.582 | 40(80.0) | 27(79.4) | 13(81.2) | 1.000 |
Fail to reject | 37(9.3) | 24(8.8) | 13(10.5) | 10(20.0) | 7(20.6) | 3(18.8) | ||
VMMC makes a man a muslim, n(%) | ||||||||
Reject | 347(87.6) | 234(86.0) | 113(91.1) | 0.153 | 43(86.0) | 29(85.3) | 14(87.5) | 1.000 |
Fail to reject | 49(12.4) | 38(14.0) | 11(8.9) | 7(14.0) | 5(14.7) | 2(12.5) | ||
VMMC reduces risk of HIV transmission to female partner, n(%) | ||||||||
Reject | 97(24.5) | 68(25.0) | 29(23.4) | 0.729 | 8(16.0) | 4(11.8) | 4(25.0) | 0.249 |
Fail to reject | 299(75.5) | 205(75.0) | 95(76.6) | 42(84.0) | 30(88.2) | 12(75.0) | ||
Men usually desire more sexual partners after VMMC, n(%) | ||||||||
Reject | 230(58.1) | 47(45.0) | 83(66.9) | 0.016 | 25(50.0) | 5(44.1) | 10(62.5) | 0.225 |
Fail to reject | 66(41.9) | 25(46.0) | 41(33.1) | 25(50.0) | 19(55.9) | 6(37.5) | ||
VMMC reduces sexual performance, n(%) | ||||||||
Reject | 284(71.7) | 181(66.5) | 103(83.1) | 0.001 | 25(50.0) | 13(38.2) | 12(75.0) | 0.032 |
Fail to reject | 12(28.3) | 91(33.5) | 21(16.9) | 25(50.0) | 21(61.8) | 4(25.0) |
Crude PR (95% CI) | p-value | Weighted.PR (95% CI) a | p-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male respondents | VMMC differs from traditional circumcision | ||||
Fail to accept vs Accept | 0.67(0.45–1.01) | 0.053 | 0.77(0.51–1.15) | 0.204 | |
Men normally bleed after VMMC | |||||
Fail to reject vs Reject | 0.57(0.37–0.88) | 0.011 | 0.67(0.41–1.08) | 0.103 | |
Men usually desire more sexual partners after VMMC | |||||
Fail to reject vs Reject | 0.68(0.50–0.94) | 0.019 | 0.65 (0.46–0.92) | 0.014* | |
VMMC reduces sexual performance | |||||
Fail to reject vs Reject | 0.52(0.34–0.78) | 0.002 | 0.58(0.38–0.89) | 0.012* | |
Female respondents | VMMC reduces (men’s)sexual performance | ||||
Fail to reject vs Reject | 0.33(0.12–0.90) | 0.031 | 0.22(0.07–0.76) | 0.016* |