Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2019

01.11.2018 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Labor progression of women attempting vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery with or without epidural analgesia

verfasst von: Netanella Miller, Michel Pelleg, Nasrean Hag-Yahia, Yair Daykan, Yael Pasternak, Tal Biron-Shental

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Normal labor curves have not been assessed for women undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC). This study examined labor patterns during TOLAC in relation to epidural analgesia use.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of deliveries of women undergoing TOLAC at a single, academic, tertiary medical center. Length of first, second and third stages of labor was compared between 424 women undergoing TOLAC in the current labor with no previous vaginal delivery (VD) and 357 women with at least one previous VD and current TOLAC.

Results

Women in the TOLAC only group had significantly longer labors compared to women in the previous VD and TOLAC group. In both groups, women who underwent epidural analgesia had longer first and second stages of labor. In the TOLAC only group, more women who had epidural analgesia tended to deliver vaginally as compared to those who did not (P = 0.09). For women who delivered vaginally, the 95th percentile for the second stage duration with epidural was 3.40 h in the TOLAC only group and 2.3 h in the previous VD and TOLAC group. The 95th percentile for the second stage duration without epidural was 1.4 h in the TOLAC only group and 0.9 h in the previous VD and TOLAC group.

Conclusions

Operative intervention (instrumental delivery/cesarean delivery (CD)) might be considered for women attempting TOLAC after a 2-h duration of second stage without epidural and 3-h duration with epidural, with an hour less for women who also had previous VD.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman E (1955) The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obs Gynecol. 6(6):567–589CrossRef Friedman E (1955) The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obs Gynecol. 6(6):567–589CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman E (1978) Labor clinical evaluation and management. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York Friedman E (1978) Labor clinical evaluation and management. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Troendle J, Mikolajczyk R (2010) The natural history of the normal first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 115(4):705–710CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Troendle J, Mikolajczyk R (2010) The natural history of the normal first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 115(4):705–710CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, Burkman R (2010) Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 116(6):1281–1287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, Burkman R (2010) Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 116(6):1281–1287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Uddin SFG, Simon AE (2013) Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990–2009. Matern Child Heal J 17:1309–1314CrossRef Uddin SFG, Simon AE (2013) Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990–2009. Matern Child Heal J 17:1309–1314CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ et al (2009) Williams obstetrics, 23rd edn. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ et al (2009) Williams obstetrics, 23rd edn. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O’Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BMGS (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 351(25):2581–2589CrossRefPubMed Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O’Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BMGS (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 351(25):2581–2589CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Grantz KL, Gonzalez-quintero V, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Hinkle SN, Kominiarek MA (2016) Labor patterns in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean with normal neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213(2):226.e1–226.e6CrossRef Grantz KL, Gonzalez-quintero V, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Hinkle SN, Kominiarek MA (2016) Labor patterns in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean with normal neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213(2):226.e1–226.e6CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hueston WJ, McClaflin RR, Mansfield CJRM (1994) Factors associated with the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia. Obs Gynecol 84(4):579–582 Hueston WJ, McClaflin RR, Mansfield CJRM (1994) Factors associated with the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia. Obs Gynecol 84(4):579–582
10.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Hana HP, Levy A, Rozen A, Greemberg L, Shapira Y SE. The effect of epidural analgesia on labor progress and outcome in nulliparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 21:517–521 O’Hana HP, Levy A, Rozen A, Greemberg L, Shapira Y SE. The effect of epidural analgesia on labor progress and outcome in nulliparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 21:517–521
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Decca L, Daldoss C, Fratelli N, Lojacono A, Slompo M, Stegher C et al (2004) Labor course and delivery in epidural analgesia: a case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 16:115–118CrossRefPubMed Decca L, Daldoss C, Fratelli N, Lojacono A, Slompo M, Stegher C et al (2004) Labor course and delivery in epidural analgesia: a case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 16:115–118CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RMDJL (2011) Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD000331 Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RMDJL (2011) Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD000331
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Worstell T, Ahsan A, Cahill CA (2014) Length of the second stage of labor: what is the effect of an epidural? Obstet Gynecol 12:CD000331 Worstell T, Ahsan A, Cahill CA (2014) Length of the second stage of labor: what is the effect of an epidural? Obstet Gynecol 12:CD000331
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu RR, Janik R, Nygren P, Walker M (2010) Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess 191:1–397 Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu RR, Janik R, Nygren P, Walker M (2010) Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess 191:1–397
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen US, Rothman KJ, Demissie S, Jackson DJ, Lang JMEJ (2010) Epidural analgesia and risks of cesarean and operative vaginal deliveries in nulliparous and multiparous womens. Matern Child Health 14:705–712CrossRef Nguyen US, Rothman KJ, Demissie S, Jackson DJ, Lang JMEJ (2010) Epidural analgesia and risks of cesarean and operative vaginal deliveries in nulliparous and multiparous womens. Matern Child Health 14:705–712CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Eriksen LM, Nohr EAKH (2011) Mode of delivery after epidural analgesia in a cohort of low-risk nulliparas. Birth 38:317–326CrossRefPubMed Eriksen LM, Nohr EAKH (2011) Mode of delivery after epidural analgesia in a cohort of low-risk nulliparas. Birth 38:317–326CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Consensus OC (2014) Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. ACOG Consensus OC (2014) Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. ACOG
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Salman L, Hiersch L, Shmueli A, Krispin E, Wiznitzer A G-BR (2018) Complicated primary cesarean delivery increases the risk for uterine rupture at subsequent trial of labor after cesarean. Arch Gynecol Obs 298(2):273–277 Salman L, Hiersch L, Shmueli A, Krispin E, Wiznitzer A G-BR (2018) Complicated primary cesarean delivery increases the risk for uterine rupture at subsequent trial of labor after cesarean. Arch Gynecol Obs 298(2):273–277
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ram M, Hiersch L, Ashwal E, Nassie D, Lavie A, Yogev YAA (2018) Trial of labor following one previous cesarean delivery: the effect of gestational age. Arch Gynecol Obs. 297(4):907–913CrossRef Ram M, Hiersch L, Ashwal E, Nassie D, Lavie A, Yogev YAA (2018) Trial of labor following one previous cesarean delivery: the effect of gestational age. Arch Gynecol Obs. 297(4):907–913CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Harper LM, Cahill AG, Roehl KA et al (2012) The pattern of labor preceding uterine rupture. Am J Obs Gynecol 207:210.e1–6CrossRef Harper LM, Cahill AG, Roehl KA et al (2012) The pattern of labor preceding uterine rupture. Am J Obs Gynecol 207:210.e1–6CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT et al (1999) Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obs Gynecol 181:882–886CrossRef Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT et al (1999) Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obs Gynecol 181:882–886CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Labor progression of women attempting vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery with or without epidural analgesia
verfasst von
Netanella Miller
Michel Pelleg
Nasrean Hag-Yahia
Yair Daykan
Yael Pasternak
Tal Biron-Shental
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4956-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.