Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery 4/2017

03.11.2017 | Original Article

Laparoscopic appendectomy vs antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis: a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter cohort study

verfasst von: Gaetano Poillucci, Lorenzo Mortola, Mauro Podda, Salomone Di Saverio, Laura Casula, Chiara Gerardi, Nicola Cillara, Luigi Presenti, The ACTUAA-R Collaborative Working Group on Acute Appendicitis

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Acute appendicitis (AA) is among the most common causes of acute lower abdominal pain leading patients to the emergency department. Significant debate remains on whether AA should be operated or not. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed in seven Italian Hospitals, with the aim to assess safety and feasibility both nonoperative management with antibiotics (AT) and surgical therapy with appendectomy (ST) for patients with AA. Data regarding all patients discharged from the participating centers with a diagnosis of appendicitis from January 1st, 2014 to December 31st, 2014 were collected retrospectively. Follow-up data were collected from January 1st, 2015 to December 31st, 2016. The complication-free treatment success of AT (53.7%) was significantly inferior to that of ST (86.4%) (P < 0.0001). Patients initially treated with antibiotics reported an index admission AT failure rate of 20.9% and a recurrence rate at 1-year follow-up of 20.3%. No statistically significant difference was found when comparing AT and ST groups for the outcome of interest post-operative complications (13.5 vs 13.6%, P = 0.834). Patients treated with AT were discharged home earlier than patients in the ST group (3.38 ± 1.89 vs 4.84 ± 2.69 days, P < 0.0001). Due to the low rates of complications occurred in the ST group and the high efficacy of the surgical therapy, laparoscopic appendectomy still represents the most effective treatment for patients with AA. AT is associated with shorter hospital stay and faster return to normal activity, and may prevent from appendectomies around 80% of patients who leave the hospital with clinical recovery.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA et al (2007) Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg 245:886–892CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA et al (2007) Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg 245:886–892CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Podda M, Cillara N, Balestra F et al (2017) A short commentary on “Nonoperative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in adults: what do we need to get certainty?”. Int J Surg. 40:109–111CrossRefPubMed Podda M, Cillara N, Balestra F et al (2017) A short commentary on “Nonoperative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in adults: what do we need to get certainty?”. Int J Surg. 40:109–111CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the US. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925CrossRefPubMed Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the US. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fitz R (1886) Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix. Am J Med Sci 92:321–346 Fitz R (1886) Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix. Am J Med Sci 92:321–346
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Flum DR (2015) Acute appendicitis—appendectomy or the “Antibiotics first” strategy. N Engl J Med 372:1937–1943CrossRefPubMed Flum DR (2015) Acute appendicitis—appendectomy or the “Antibiotics first” strategy. N Engl J Med 372:1937–1943CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T et al (2015) Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313:2340–2348CrossRefPubMed Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T et al (2015) Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313:2340–2348CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Findlay JM, Kafsi JE, Hammer C et al (2016) Nonoperative management of appendicitis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg 223:814–824CrossRefPubMed Findlay JM, Kafsi JE, Hammer C et al (2016) Nonoperative management of appendicitis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg 223:814–824CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mentula P, Sammalkorpi H, Leppaniemi A (2015) Laparoscopic surgery or conservative treatment for appendiceal abscess in adults? A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 262:237–242CrossRefPubMed Mentula P, Sammalkorpi H, Leppaniemi A (2015) Laparoscopic surgery or conservative treatment for appendiceal abscess in adults? A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 262:237–242CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S et al (2011) Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:1573–1579CrossRefPubMed Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S et al (2011) Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:1573–1579CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I et al (2006) Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 30:1033–1037CrossRefPubMed Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I et al (2006) Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 30:1033–1037CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Podda M, Cillara N, Di Saverio S et al (2017) Antibiotics-first strategy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults is associated with increased rates of peritonitis at surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing appendectomy and non-operative management with antibiotics. Surgeon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2017.02.001 [(Epub ahead of print) Review] PubMed Podda M, Cillara N, Di Saverio S et al (2017) Antibiotics-first strategy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults is associated with increased rates of peritonitis at surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing appendectomy and non-operative management with antibiotics. Surgeon. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​surge.​2017.​02.​001 [(Epub ahead of print) Review] PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Agresta F, Campanile FC, Podda M et al (2016) Current status of laparoscopy for acute abdomen in Italy: a critical appraisal of 2012 clinical guidelines from two consecutive nationwide surveys with analysis of 271,323 cases over 5 years. Surg Endosc 31:1785–1795CrossRefPubMed Agresta F, Campanile FC, Podda M et al (2016) Current status of laparoscopy for acute abdomen in Italy: a critical appraisal of 2012 clinical guidelines from two consecutive nationwide surveys with analysis of 271,323 cases over 5 years. Surg Endosc 31:1785–1795CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344–349CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344–349CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersson M, Andersson RE (2008) The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg 32:1843–1849CrossRefPubMed Andersson M, Andersson RE (2008) The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg 32:1843–1849CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Agostino RB (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17:2265–2281CrossRefPubMed D’Agostino RB (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17:2265–2281CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansson J, Körner U, Khorram-Manesh A et al (2009) Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg 96:473–481CrossRefPubMed Hansson J, Körner U, Khorram-Manesh A et al (2009) Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg 96:473–481CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersson RE (2007) The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than a early diagnosis. World J Surg 31:86–92CrossRefPubMed Andersson RE (2007) The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than a early diagnosis. World J Surg 31:86–92CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Luckmann R (1989) Incidence and case fatality rates for acute appendicitis in California. A population-based study of the effects of age. Am J Epidemiol 129:905–918CrossRefPubMed Luckmann R (1989) Incidence and case fatality rates for acute appendicitis in California. A population-based study of the effects of age. Am J Epidemiol 129:905–918CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehlers AP, Talan DA, Moran GJ et al (2016) Evidence for an antibiotics-first strategy for uncomplicated appendicitis in adults: a systematic review and gap analysis. J Am Coll Surg 222:309–314CrossRefPubMed Ehlers AP, Talan DA, Moran GJ et al (2016) Evidence for an antibiotics-first strategy for uncomplicated appendicitis in adults: a systematic review and gap analysis. J Am Coll Surg 222:309–314CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Eriksson S, Granström L (1995) Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 82:166–169CrossRefPubMed Eriksson S, Granström L (1995) Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 82:166–169CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Podda M, Serventi F, Mortola L et al (2017) A prospective non-randomized controlled, multicenter trial comparing Appendectomy and Conservative Treatment for patients with Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis (the ACTUAA STUDY). Int J Colorect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2878-5 Podda M, Serventi F, Mortola L et al (2017) A prospective non-randomized controlled, multicenter trial comparing Appendectomy and Conservative Treatment for patients with Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis (the ACTUAA STUDY). Int J Colorect Dis. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00384-017-2878-5
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansson J, Khorram-Manesh A, Alwindawe A et al (2014) A model to select patients who may benefit from antibiotic therapy as the first line treatment of acute appendicitis at high probability. J Gastrointest Surg 18:961–967CrossRefPubMed Hansson J, Khorram-Manesh A, Alwindawe A et al (2014) A model to select patients who may benefit from antibiotic therapy as the first line treatment of acute appendicitis at high probability. J Gastrointest Surg 18:961–967CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Saverio S, Sibilio A, Giorgini E et al (2014) The NOTA study (Non Operative Treatment for Acute Appendicitis): prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) for treating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and long-term follow-up of conservatively treated suspected appendicitis. Ann Surg 260:109–117CrossRefPubMed Di Saverio S, Sibilio A, Giorgini E et al (2014) The NOTA study (Non Operative Treatment for Acute Appendicitis): prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) for treating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and long-term follow-up of conservatively treated suspected appendicitis. Ann Surg 260:109–117CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat National Surgical Research, C (2013) Multicentre observational study of performance variation in provision and outcome of emergency appendicectomy. Br J Surg 100:1240–1252CrossRef National Surgical Research, C (2013) Multicentre observational study of performance variation in provision and outcome of emergency appendicectomy. Br J Surg 100:1240–1252CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Collaborative S et al (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 248:557–563 Collaborative S et al (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 248:557–563
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakhamiyayev V, Galldin L, Chiarello M et al (2010) Laparoscopic appendectomy is the preferred approach for appendicitis: a retrospective review of two practice patterns. Surg Endosc 24:859–864CrossRefPubMed Nakhamiyayev V, Galldin L, Chiarello M et al (2010) Laparoscopic appendectomy is the preferred approach for appendicitis: a retrospective review of two practice patterns. Surg Endosc 24:859–864CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic appendectomy vs antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis: a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter cohort study
verfasst von
Gaetano Poillucci
Lorenzo Mortola
Mauro Podda
Salomone Di Saverio
Laura Casula
Chiara Gerardi
Nicola Cillara
Luigi Presenti
The ACTUAA-R Collaborative Working Group on Acute Appendicitis
Publikationsdatum
03.11.2017
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0499-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Updates in Surgery 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.