Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 6/2004

01.11.2004 | Original Article

Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with a lower complication rate even during the introductory phase

verfasst von: Matthias Kapischke, Juergen Tepel, Klaus Bley

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The benefit of laparoscopic appendicectomy is under debate. To study the beneficial clinical effects of laparoscopic appendicectomy during the introductory phase we analysed, retrospectively, 493 patients from one district general hospital.

Patients and methods

During a period of 3 years 250 patients were operated on prospectively by open appendicectomy, and 243 patients were operated on laparoscopically. Both groups were compared with regard to their demographic data, operation time, body mass index and complication rate.

Results

The conversion rate was 4.5%. The distribution of histological stages of inflammation was comparable in both groups. The median operating time was significantly longer for the open (40 min) than for the laparoscopic procedure (35 min, P=0.002). The body mass index in the laparoscopic group was significant higher (23.7 kg/m2 vs 22.6 kg/m2, P=0.009). Perioperative white blood cell count, C-reactive protein and body temperature were equal in both groups. There was no significant difference with regard to the analgesia required postoperatively between the open and the laparoscopic group. Nevertheless, the specific complication rate after open appendicectomy (18.4%) was significantly higher than that following laparoscopic appendicectomy (10.8%, P=0.03).

Conclusion

Even during the introductory phase, laparoscopic appendicectomy is a safe and clinically beneficial operating procedure.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat McBurney C (1894) The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description with a new method of operating. Ann Surg 20:38–40 McBurney C (1894) The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description with a new method of operating. Ann Surg 20:38–40
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox MR, McCall JL, Wilson TG, Padbury RT, Jeans PL, Toouli J (1993) Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a prospective analysis. ANZ J Surg 63:840–847 Cox MR, McCall JL, Wilson TG, Padbury RT, Jeans PL, Toouli J (1993) Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a prospective analysis. ANZ J Surg 63:840–847
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ackermann’s (1996) Surgical pathology. Mosby Year Book, St Louis Ackermann’s (1996) Surgical pathology. Mosby Year Book, St Louis
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608PubMed Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, Padbury RT, Wilson TG, Wattchow DA, Langcake M (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20:263–266CrossRefPubMed Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, Padbury RT, Wilson TG, Wattchow DA, Langcake M (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20:263–266CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20:17–20CrossRefPubMed Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20:17–20CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Minne L, Varner D, Burnell A, Ratzer E, Clark J, Haun W (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes. Arch Surg 132:708–711 Minne L, Varner D, Burnell A, Ratzer E, Clark J, Haun W (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes. Arch Surg 132:708–711
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kald A, Kullman E, Anderberg B, Wiren M, Carlsson P, Ringqvist I, Rudberg C (1999) Cost-minimisation analysis of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Eur J Surg 165:579–582CrossRefPubMed Kald A, Kullman E, Anderberg B, Wiren M, Carlsson P, Ringqvist I, Rudberg C (1999) Cost-minimisation analysis of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Eur J Surg 165:579–582CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K (2001) Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg 88:510–514CrossRefPubMed Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K (2001) Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg 88:510–514CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyo G, Graffner H, Hallerback B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sorensen S (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 86:48–53CrossRefPubMed Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyo G, Graffner H, Hallerback B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sorensen S (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 86:48–53CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Koch A, Marusch F, Gastinger I (2000) Appendizitis: wann laparoskopisch und wann konventionell operieren? Chirurgische Gastroenterologie 16:126–130CrossRef Koch A, Marusch F, Gastinger I (2000) Appendizitis: wann laparoskopisch und wann konventionell operieren? Chirurgische Gastroenterologie 16:126–130CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Schafer M, Krahenbuhl L, Frei E, Buchler MW (2000) Laparoscopic appendectomy in Switzerland: a prospective audit of 2,179 cases. Dig Surg 17:497–502CrossRefPubMed Schafer M, Krahenbuhl L, Frei E, Buchler MW (2000) Laparoscopic appendectomy in Switzerland: a prospective audit of 2,179 cases. Dig Surg 17:497–502CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoltzing H, Thon K (2000) Perforated appendicitis: is laparoscopic operation advisable? Dig Surg 17:610–616CrossRefPubMed Stoltzing H, Thon K (2000) Perforated appendicitis: is laparoscopic operation advisable? Dig Surg 17:610–616CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42:377–383PubMed Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42:377–383PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–256CrossRefPubMed Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–256CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Eypasch E, Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2002) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense. Dig Surg 19:518–522CrossRefPubMed Eypasch E, Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2002) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense. Dig Surg 19:518–522CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B (1999) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9:17–26CrossRefPubMed Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B (1999) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9:17–26CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat So JB, Chiong EC, Chiong E, Cheah WK, Lomanto D, Goh P, Kum CK (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 26:1485–1488CrossRefPubMed So JB, Chiong EC, Chiong E, Cheah WK, Lomanto D, Goh P, Kum CK (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 26:1485–1488CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehlert HG, Fielitz J, Neumann U (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy as routine operation for treatment of inflammatory diseases of the appendix. Analysis of 733 laparoscopic appendectomies 6/1992 to 8/1997 in the Reichenbach district hospital. Zentralbl Chir 4:101–103 Ehlert HG, Fielitz J, Neumann U (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy as routine operation for treatment of inflammatory diseases of the appendix. Analysis of 733 laparoscopic appendectomies 6/1992 to 8/1997 in the Reichenbach district hospital. Zentralbl Chir 4:101–103
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazemier G, de Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11:336–340CrossRefPubMed Kazemier G, de Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11:336–340CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Piskun G, Kozik D, Rajpal S, Shaftan G, Fogler R (2001) Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 15:660–662CrossRefPubMed Piskun G, Kozik D, Rajpal S, Shaftan G, Fogler R (2001) Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 15:660–662CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wullstein C, Barkhausen S, Gross E (2001) Results of laparoscopic vs. conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1700–1705PubMed Wullstein C, Barkhausen S, Gross E (2001) Results of laparoscopic vs. conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1700–1705PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalili TM, Hiatt JR, Savar A, Lau C, Margulies DR (1999) Perforated appendicitis is not a contraindication to laparoscopy. Am Surg 65:965–967PubMed Khalili TM, Hiatt JR, Savar A, Lau C, Margulies DR (1999) Perforated appendicitis is not a contraindication to laparoscopy. Am Surg 65:965–967PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Alvarez C, Voitk AJ (2000) The road to ambulatory laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis. Am J Surg 179:63–66CrossRef Alvarez C, Voitk AJ (2000) The road to ambulatory laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis. Am J Surg 179:63–66CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Frazee RC, Bohannon WT (1996) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg 131:509–511 Frazee RC, Bohannon WT (1996) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg 131:509–511
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson AB, Peetz ME (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 12:940–943CrossRefPubMed Johnson AB, Peetz ME (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 12:940–943CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ, Beart RW Jr (1997) Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1:188–193CrossRefPubMed Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ, Beart RW Jr (1997) Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1:188–193CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212CrossRefPubMed Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Klima S (1998) Importance of appendix stump management in laparoscopic appendectomy. Zentralbl Chir 4:90–93 Klima S (1998) Importance of appendix stump management in laparoscopic appendectomy. Zentralbl Chir 4:90–93
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsugawa K, Koyanagi N, Hashizume M, Tomikawa M, Ayukawa K, Akahoshi K, Sugimachi K (2001) A comparison of an open and laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with liver cirrhosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:189–194CrossRefPubMed Tsugawa K, Koyanagi N, Hashizume M, Tomikawa M, Ayukawa K, Akahoshi K, Sugimachi K (2001) A comparison of an open and laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with liver cirrhosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:189–194CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Little DC, Custer MD, May BH, Blalock SE, Cooney DR (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy: an unnecessary and expensive procedure in children? J Pediatr Surg 37:310–317CrossRefPubMed Little DC, Custer MD, May BH, Blalock SE, Cooney DR (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy: an unnecessary and expensive procedure in children? J Pediatr Surg 37:310–317CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plewes A, Sweeney J, Davies W, Gray D, Taylor B (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients. Can J Surg 39:457–462PubMed Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plewes A, Sweeney J, Davies W, Gray D, Taylor B (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients. Can J Surg 39:457–462PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Henle KP, Beller S, Rechner J, Zerz A, Szinicz G, Klingler A (1996) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study. Chirurgie 67:526–530PubMed Henle KP, Beller S, Rechner J, Zerz A, Szinicz G, Klingler A (1996) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study. Chirurgie 67:526–530PubMed
34.
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with a lower complication rate even during the introductory phase
verfasst von
Matthias Kapischke
Juergen Tepel
Klaus Bley
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2004
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2004
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0511-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2004

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 6/2004 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.