Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2017

17.01.2017 | Original Article

Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Cecostomy (LAPEC) in Children and Young Adults

verfasst von: Shifra Koyfman, Kristen Swartz, Allan M. Goldstein, Kyle Staller

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy (LAPEC) procedure both in children and young adults, along with review of their pre-operative motility profiles, antegrade continence enema (ACE) regimen, and postoperative complications.

Methods

This retrospective review investigated 38 patients (32 children and 6 young adults) that underwent the LAPEC procedure. Primary outcomes evaluated were success versus failure of the procedure and post-operative complications. Success was defined as daily stool evacuation with minimal to no fecal incontinence per week.

Results

Mean follow up time was 25.8 ± 22.4 months. Indications for LAPEC included slow transit constipation or colonic neuropathy (n = 22), other types of constipation (n = 5), and a variety of congenital disorders (n = 11). The overall success rate was 95% (36/38 patients) with the two failures in children, both attributed to inability to use the tube due to underlying behavioral disorders or severe anxiety. Five patients above age 18 had leakage compared to 6 in the under age 18 group (83% vs. 19, P = 0.003). There were no other significant complications.

Conclusion

LAPEC is a safe and effective means of addressing refractory constipation and fecal incontinence in children and young adults who have failed medical management with minimal post-operative complications.
Literatur
1.
Choung RS, Shah ND, Chitkara D et al. Direct medical costs of constipation from childhood to early adulthood: A population-based birth cohort study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011 Jan;52(1):47–54.
2.
Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS, et al. Fecal incontinence in US adults: Epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology 2009 8;137(2):512,517.e2.
3.
Lewis ML, Palsson OS, Whitehead WE et al. Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in Children and Adolescents. J Pediatr.
4.
Malone PS, Ransley PG, Kiely EM. Originally published as volume 336, issue 8725 preliminary report: The antegrade continence enema. The Lancet 1990 17 November 1990;336(8725):1217–8.
5.
Biyani D, Barrow E, Hodson P et al. Endoscopically placed caecostomy buttons: A trial ACE procedure. Colorectal Disease 2007;9(4):373–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Krogh K, Laurberg S. Malone antegrade continence enema for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults. Br J Surg 1998;85(7):974–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Graf JL, Strear C, Bratton B et al. The antegrade continence enema procedure: A review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 1998 August 1998;33(8):1294–6.
8.
Yeung CK LL. Laparoscopic cecostomy for anterior ectopic anus with constipation: A new and technical proposal. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2000;10(4):276–7.
9.
Burge DM, Shandling B, Chait PG et al. Papers presented at the 42nd annual international congress percutaneous cecostomy: A new technique in the management of fecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg 1996 April 1996;31(4):534–7.
10.
Rodriguez L, Flores A, Gilchrist BF et al. Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy in children with defecation disorders (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2011 1;73(1):98–102.
11.
Lynch CR, Jones RG, Hilden K et al. Percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy in adults: A case series. Gastrointest Endosc 2006 8;64(2):279–82.
12.
Mousa HM, Den Berg, Maartje M. Van, et al. Cecostomy in children with defecation disorders. Dig Dis Sci 2006;51(1):154–60.
13.
Rivera MT, Kugathasan S, Berger W et al. Percutaneous colonoscopic cecostomy for management of chronic constipation in children. Gastrointest Endosc 2001 Feb;53(2):225–8.
14.
Mugie SM, Machado RS, Mousa HM et al. Ten-year experience using antegrade enemas in children. J Pediatr 2012 10;161(4):700–4.
15.
Duchalais E, Meurette G, Mantoo SK et al. Percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy for severe constipation in adults: Feasibility, durability, functional and quality of life results at 1Â year follow-up. Surg Endosc 2015;29(3):620–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Marker DR, Perosi N, Ul Haq F et al. Percutaneous cecostomy in adult patients: Safety and quality-of-life results. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2015 10;26(10):1526,1532.e1.
17.
Patton V, Lubowski DZ. Clinical outcome and efficacy of antegrade colonic enemas administered via an indwelling cecostomy catheter in adults with defecatory disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 2015 Apr;58(4):457–62.
18.
Myers JB, Hu EM, Elliott SP et al. Short-term outcomes of chait trapdoor for antegrade continence enema in adults. Urology 2014 Jun;83(6):1423–6.
19.
Hirst GR, Arumugam PJ, Watkins AJ et al. Antegrade continence enema in the treatment of obstructed defaecation with or without faecal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol 2005 Dec;9(3):217–21.
20.
Worsoe J, Christensen P, Krogh K et al. Long-term results of antegrade colonic enema in adult patients: Assessment of functional results. Dis Colon Rectum 2008 Oct;51(10):1523–8.
21.
Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Giraudo G et al. Outcome of antegrade continence enema procedures for faecal incontinence in adults. Br J Surg 2006 Oct;93(10):1265–9.
22.
Sinha CK, Grewal A, Ward HC. Antegrade continence enema (ACE): Current practice. Pediatr Surg Int 2008 Jun;24(6):685–8.
23.
Lees NP, Hodson P, Hill J et al. Long-term results of the antegrade continent enema procedure for constipation in adults. Colorectal Dis 2004 Sep;6(5):362–8.
24.
Teichman JM, Zabihi N, Kraus SR et al. Long-term results for malone antegrade continence enema for adults with neurogenic bowel disease. Urology 2003 Mar;61(3):502–6.
25.
Poirier M, Abcarian H, Nelson R. Malone antegrade continent enema: An alternative to resection in severe defecation disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 2007 Jan;50(1):22–8.
26.
Peeraully MR, Lopes J, Wright A et al. Experience of the MACE procedure at a regional pediatric surgical unit: A 15-year retrospective review. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2014 Feb;24(1):113–6.
27.
Masadeh MM, Krein M, Peterson J et al. Outcome of antegrade continent enema (ACE) procedures in children and young adults. J Pediatr Surg 2013 Oct;48(10):2128–33.
28.
Yamout SZ, Glick PL, Lee YH et al. Initial experience with laparoscopic chait trapdoor cecostomy catheter placement for the management of fecal incontinence in children: Outcomes and lessons learned. Pediatr Surg Int 2009 Dec;25(12):1081–5.
29.
Wong AL, Kravarusic D, Wong SL. Impact of cecostomy and antegrade colonic enemas on management of fecal incontinence and constipation: Ten years of experience in pediatric population. J Pediatr Surg 2008 8;43(8):1445–51.
30.
Becmeur F, Demarche M, Lacreuse I et al. Cecostomy button for antegrade enemas: Survey of 29 patients. J Pediatr Surg 2008 Oct;43(10):1853–7.
31.
Kim J, Beasley SW, Maoate K. Appendicostomy stomas and antegrade colonic irrigation after laparoscopic antegrade continence enema. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 2006 08;16(4):400–3.
32.
Yagmurlu A, Harmon CM, Georgeson KE. Laparoscopic cecostomy button placement for the management of fecal incontinence in children with hirschsprung’s disease and anorectal anomalies. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 2006;20(4):624–7.CrossRefPubMed
33.
King SK, Sutcliffe JR, Southwell BR et al. The antegrade continence enema successfully treats idiopathic slow-transit constipation. J Pediatr Surg 2005 Dec;40(12):1935–40.
34.
Youssef NN, Barksdale Jr E, Griffiths JM et al. Management of intractable constipation with antegrade enemas in neurologically intact children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2002 Apr;34(4):402–5.
35.
Chait PG, Shandling B, Richards HM et al. Fecal incontinence in children: Treatment with percutaneous cecostomy tube placement--a prospective study. Radiology 1997 Jun;203(3):621–4.
36.
DeFreest L, Smith J, Whyte C. Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous cecostomy for antegrade continence enema. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 2014 04;24(4):261–4.
37.
Athanasakos EP, Kemal KI, Malliwal RS et al. Clinical and psychosocial functioning in adolescents and young adults with anorectal malformations and chronic idiopathic constipation. Br J Surg 2013 May;100(6):832–9.
38.
Pfeifer J. Surgical options to treat constipation: A brief overview. Rozhl Chir 2015 Sep;94(9):349–61.
39.
Dudekula A, Huftless S, Bielefeldt K. Colectomy for constipation: Time trends and impact based on the US nationwide inpatient sample, 1998–2011. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015;42(11–12):1281–93.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Patton V, Stewart P, Lubowski DZ et al. Sacral nerve stimulation fails to offer long-term benefit in patients with slow-transit constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 2016 Sep;59(9):878–85.
41.
Sulkowski JP, Nacion KM, Deans KJ et al. Sacral nerve stimulation: A promising therapy for fecal and urinary incontinence and constipation in children. J Pediatr Surg 2015 10;50(10):1644–7.
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Cecostomy (LAPEC) in Children and Young Adults
verfasst von
Shifra Koyfman
Kristen Swartz
Allan M. Goldstein
Kyle Staller
Publikationsdatum
17.01.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3353-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

How I do it

Biliary Duct-to-Duct Reconstruction with a Tunneled Retroperitoneal T-Tube During Liver Transplantation: a Novel Approach to Decrease Biliary Leaks After T-Tube Removal

GI Image

Isolated Pancreatic Uncinate Duct IPMN

Case Report

Successful Treatment of an Unusual Case of FPLD2: The Role of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass—Case Report and Literature Review

White Paper

Advanced GI Surgery Training—a Roadmap for the Future: the White Paper from the SSAT Task Force on Advanced GI Surgery Training

Original Article

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Colectomy Improves Perioperative Outcomes Without Increasing Operative Time Compared to the Open Approach: a National Analysis of 8791 Patients

Evidence-Based Current Surgical Practice

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Complicated Diverticulitis

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.