Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2018

15.08.2017

Laparoscopic colectomy reduces complications and hospital length of stay in colon cancer patients with liver disease and ascites

verfasst von: Kevin Y. Pei, David T. Asuzu, Kimberly A. Davis

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Ascites increases perioperative complications and risk of death, but is not an absolute contraindication for colectomy in patients with colon cancer. It remains unclear whether postoperative risks can be minimized using a laparoscopic versus open approach.

Methods

Data were retrospectively analyzed from 2152 patients with ascites who underwent laparoscopic or open partial colectomy with diagnosis of colon cancer from 2005 to 2013 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Postoperative outcomes were analyzed using two-sample tests of proportions and two-sample T tests. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) or β coefficients for postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and 30-day mortality were calculated using multivariable logistic or linear regression. P values <0.05 two-tailed were considered statistically significant.

Results

205 patients (9.53%) with ascites underwent laparoscopic colectomy (LC). There was no significant difference in operative time between laparoscopic versus open surgery (145 vs. 146 min, P = 0.69). LC was associated with decreased likelihood of overall complications (adjusted OR 0.7 95% CI 0.4–1.0, P = 0.046) and shorter hospital length of stay (9 days vs. 15 days, adjusted β = −4.2, 95% CI −7.7 to −0.7, P = 0.018). There was no difference in 30-day mortality (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.50–1.35, P = 0.429).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic colectomy decreases postoperative complications and hospital length of stay in patients with colon cancer and ascites. Laparoscopic approach should be considered for patients in this high-risk population.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Paolino J, Steinhagen RM (2014) Colorectal surgery in cirrhotic patients. Sci World J 2014:239293CrossRef Paolino J, Steinhagen RM (2014) Colorectal surgery in cirrhotic patients. Sci World J 2014:239293CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Causey MW, Steele SR, Farris Z, Lyle DS, Beitler AL (2012) An assessment of different scoring systems in cirrhotic patients undergoing nontransplant surgery. Am J Surg 203:589–593CrossRefPubMed Causey MW, Steele SR, Farris Z, Lyle DS, Beitler AL (2012) An assessment of different scoring systems in cirrhotic patients undergoing nontransplant surgery. Am J Surg 203:589–593CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Telem DA, Schiano T, Goldstone R, Han DK, Buch KE, Chin EH, Nguyen SQ, Divino CM (2010) Factors that predict outcome of abdominal operations in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:451–457CrossRefPubMed Telem DA, Schiano T, Goldstone R, Han DK, Buch KE, Chin EH, Nguyen SQ, Divino CM (2010) Factors that predict outcome of abdominal operations in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:451–457CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Beart RW Jr (1987) The surgical risk of colectomy in patients with cirrhosis. Dis Colon Rectum 30:529–531CrossRefPubMed Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Beart RW Jr (1987) The surgical risk of colectomy in patients with cirrhosis. Dis Colon Rectum 30:529–531CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Oprian CA, Vernava AM, Wade TP, Phelan MA, Henderson WG, Daley J, Khuri SF (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:83–91CrossRefPubMed Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Oprian CA, Vernava AM, Wade TP, Phelan MA, Henderson WG, Daley J, Khuri SF (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:83–91CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Di B, Li Y, Wei K, Xiao X, Shi J, Zhang Y, Yang X, Gao P, Zhang K, Yuan Y, Zhang D, Wei X, Liu S, Wang J, Wang X, Zhang Y, Cai H (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up outcomes. Surg Oncol 22:e39–e43CrossRefPubMed Di B, Li Y, Wei K, Xiao X, Shi J, Zhang Y, Yang X, Gao P, Zhang K, Yuan Y, Zhang D, Wei X, Liu S, Wang J, Wang X, Zhang Y, Cai H (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up outcomes. Surg Oncol 22:e39–e43CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vennix S, Boersema GS, Buskens CJ, Menon AG, Tanis PJ, Lange JF, Bemelman WA (2016) Emergency laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with generalised peritonitis: a systematic review. Dig Surg 33:1–7CrossRefPubMed Vennix S, Boersema GS, Buskens CJ, Menon AG, Tanis PJ, Lange JF, Bemelman WA (2016) Emergency laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with generalised peritonitis: a systematic review. Dig Surg 33:1–7CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Biondi A, Grosso G, Mistretta A, Marventano S, Toscano C, Gruttadauria S, Basile F (2013) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer: short- and long-term outcomes comparison. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 23:1–7CrossRef Biondi A, Grosso G, Mistretta A, Marventano S, Toscano C, Gruttadauria S, Basile F (2013) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer: short- and long-term outcomes comparison. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 23:1–7CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study G, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study G, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, Group MCt (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, Group MCt (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Group COcLoORIS (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Group COcLoORIS (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, Boilesen E, Thompson J, Oleynikov D (2012) Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg 256:462–468CrossRefPubMed Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, Boilesen E, Thompson J, Oleynikov D (2012) Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg 256:462–468CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhama AR, Charlton ME, Schmitt MB, Cromwell JW, Byrn JC (2015) Factors associated with conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Colorectal Dis 17:257–264CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bhama AR, Charlton ME, Schmitt MB, Cromwell JW, Byrn JC (2015) Factors associated with conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Colorectal Dis 17:257–264CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pei KY, Asuzu D, Davis KA (2016) Will laparoscopic lysis of adhesions become the standard of care? Evaluating trends and outcomes in laparoscopic management of small-bowel obstruction using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Database. Surg Endosc Pei KY, Asuzu D, Davis KA (2016) Will laparoscopic lysis of adhesions become the standard of care? Evaluating trends and outcomes in laparoscopic management of small-bowel obstruction using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Database. Surg Endosc
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, Chong V, Fabri PJ, Gibbs JO, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Irvin G 3rd, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228:491–507CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, Chong V, Fabri PJ, Gibbs JO, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Irvin G 3rd, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228:491–507CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fink AS, Campbell DA Jr, Mentzer RM Jr, Henderson WG, Daley J, Bannister J, Hur K, Khuri SF (2002) The national surgical quality improvement program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg 236:344–353 discussion 353-344 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fink AS, Campbell DA Jr, Mentzer RM Jr, Henderson WG, Daley J, Bannister J, Hur K, Khuri SF (2002) The national surgical quality improvement program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg 236:344–353 discussion 353-344 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Welch BL (1947) The generalisation of student’s problems when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34:28–35PubMed Welch BL (1947) The generalisation of student’s problems when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34:28–35PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman LS (2010) Surgery in the patient with liver disease. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 121:192–204 discussion 205 PubMedPubMedCentral Friedman LS (2010) Surgery in the patient with liver disease. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 121:192–204 discussion 205 PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim DH, Kim SH, Kim KS, Lee WJ, Kim NK, Noh SH, Kim CB (2014) Predictors of mortality in cirrhotic patients undergoing extrahepatic surgery: comparison of Child-Turcotte-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease-based indices. ANZ J Surg 84:832–836CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Kim SH, Kim KS, Lee WJ, Kim NK, Noh SH, Kim CB (2014) Predictors of mortality in cirrhotic patients undergoing extrahepatic surgery: comparison of Child-Turcotte-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease-based indices. ANZ J Surg 84:832–836CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Befeler AS, Palmer DE, Hoffman M, Longo W, Solomon H, Di Bisceglie AM (2005) The safety of intra-abdominal surgery in patients with cirrhosis: model for end-stage liver disease score is superior to Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification in predicting outcome. Arch Surg 140:650–654 discussion 655 CrossRefPubMed Befeler AS, Palmer DE, Hoffman M, Longo W, Solomon H, Di Bisceglie AM (2005) The safety of intra-abdominal surgery in patients with cirrhosis: model for end-stage liver disease score is superior to Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification in predicting outcome. Arch Surg 140:650–654 discussion 655 CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Neeff H, Mariaskin D, Spangenberg HC, Hopt UT, Makowiec F (2011) Perioperative mortality after non-hepatic general surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis: an analysis of 138 operations in the 2000s using Child and MELD scores. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1–11CrossRefPubMed Neeff H, Mariaskin D, Spangenberg HC, Hopt UT, Makowiec F (2011) Perioperative mortality after non-hepatic general surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis: an analysis of 138 operations in the 2000s using Child and MELD scores. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1–11CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Spiliotis J, Tsiveriotis K, Datsis AD, Vaxevanidou A, Zacharis G, Giafis K, Kekelos S, Rogdakis A (2009) Wound dehiscence: is still a problem in the 21th century: a retrospective study. World J Emerg Surg 4:12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Spiliotis J, Tsiveriotis K, Datsis AD, Vaxevanidou A, Zacharis G, Giafis K, Kekelos S, Rogdakis A (2009) Wound dehiscence: is still a problem in the 21th century: a retrospective study. World J Emerg Surg 4:12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic colectomy reduces complications and hospital length of stay in colon cancer patients with liver disease and ascites
verfasst von
Kevin Y. Pei
David T. Asuzu
Kimberly A. Davis
Publikationsdatum
15.08.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5806-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.