Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

07.01.2022 | 2021 SAGES Poster

Laparoscopic distal gastric and D1 resection for large perforated duodenal bulb peptic ulcer, with intracorporeal antecolic gastrojejunal anastomosis

verfasst von: Dimitrios Oikonomou, Elisa Bottazzoli, Dimitrios Damaskos, Salomone Di Saverio

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 9/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Peptic ulcer perforation is a common surgical emergency and a major cause of death especially in elderly patients, despite the fact of the presence of effective drug treatments and an increased understanding of its etiology. Giant duodenal perforations, in particular, pose a significant challenge and there is scarce data regarding their optimal management. Laparoscopic surgery is advocated in the surgical treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer disease, in experienced hands.

Methods

Herein we present an 84-year-old man with past medical history of type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension who was admitted to our Department due to epigastric pain and diffuse peritonitis. CT scan revealed the presence of a significant amount of free air and fluid in the upper abdomen secondary to a duodenal perforation.

Results

The patient was taken immediately to the theater for an urgent laparoscopy. Methylene blue via the NG tube better defined the extent of the duodenal perforation which was not amenable to a primary repair. Consequently, a decision was made for a laparoscopic pancreas-sparing, ampulla preserving gastroduodenectomy with intracorporeal Billroth II gastrojejunal anastomosis. The postoperative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the 13th postoperative day. Histopathology revealed a large benign duodenal ulcer.

Conclusions

Although the incidence of peptic ulcer disease is decreasing, it appears that the incidence of complications is rising. Laparoscopic approach, especially when performed by laparoscopic surgery experts, could be a treatment option for difficult duodenal ulcer perforations with less pain, shorter hospital stay and reduced morbidity.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertleff MJ, Lange JF (2010) Perforated peptic ulcer disease: a review of history and treatment. Dig Surg 27:161–169CrossRef Bertleff MJ, Lange JF (2010) Perforated peptic ulcer disease: a review of history and treatment. Dig Surg 27:161–169CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Møller MH, Shah K, Bendix J, Jensen AG, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Adamsen S et al (2009) Risk factors in patients surgically treated for peptic ulcer perforation. Scand J Gastroenterol 44:145–152CrossRef Møller MH, Shah K, Bendix J, Jensen AG, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Adamsen S et al (2009) Risk factors in patients surgically treated for peptic ulcer perforation. Scand J Gastroenterol 44:145–152CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rickard J (2016) Surgery for peptic ulcer disease in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review of published data. J Gastrointest Surg 20(4):840–850CrossRef Rickard J (2016) Surgery for peptic ulcer disease in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review of published data. J Gastrointest Surg 20(4):840–850CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Crofts TJ, Park KGM, Steel RJC et al (1989) A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 320:970–973CrossRef Crofts TJ, Park KGM, Steel RJC et al (1989) A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 320:970–973CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cocks JR (1992) Perforated peptic ulcer: the changing scene. Dig Dis 10:10–16CrossRef Cocks JR (1992) Perforated peptic ulcer: the changing scene. Dig Dis 10:10–16CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanas A, Serrano P, Bajador E et al (1997) Evidence of aspirin use in both upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation. Gastroenterology 112:683–689CrossRef Lanas A, Serrano P, Bajador E et al (1997) Evidence of aspirin use in both upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation. Gastroenterology 112:683–689CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA, van der Ham AC, van der Harst E, Oei HI et al (2009) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial. World J Surg 33:1368–1373CrossRef Bertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA, van der Ham AC, van der Harst E, Oei HI et al (2009) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial. World J Surg 33:1368–1373CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinch D, Damaskos D, Di Marzo F, Di Saverio S (2021) Duodenal ulcer perforation: a systematic literature review and narrative description of surgical techniques used to treat large duodenal defects. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 91(4):748–758CrossRef Clinch D, Damaskos D, Di Marzo F, Di Saverio S (2021) Duodenal ulcer perforation: a systematic literature review and narrative description of surgical techniques used to treat large duodenal defects. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 91(4):748–758CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Saverio S, Franchi C, Kremel D, Lark ME, Todero S, Damaskos D (2021) Technique for pancreas-sparing total duodenectomy and reconstruction of a neoduodenum using a free interposed jejunal limb with ampullojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Case reports. Br J Surg 108(2):e71–e73CrossRef Di Saverio S, Franchi C, Kremel D, Lark ME, Todero S, Damaskos D (2021) Technique for pancreas-sparing total duodenectomy and reconstruction of a neoduodenum using a free interposed jejunal limb with ampullojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Case reports. Br J Surg 108(2):e71–e73CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Saverio S, Segalini E, Birindelli A, Todero S, Podda M, Rizzuto A, Tugnoli G, Biondi A (2018) Pancreas-sparing, ampulla-preserving duodenectomy for major duodenal (D1–D2) perforations. Br J Surg 105(11):1487–1492CrossRef Di Saverio S, Segalini E, Birindelli A, Todero S, Podda M, Rizzuto A, Tugnoli G, Biondi A (2018) Pancreas-sparing, ampulla-preserving duodenectomy for major duodenal (D1–D2) perforations. Br J Surg 105(11):1487–1492CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schein M (2005) Perforated peptic ulcer. In: Schein's common sense emergency abdominal surgery, Part III. Springer, Berlin, pp 143–150 Schein M (2005) Perforated peptic ulcer. In: Schein's common sense emergency abdominal surgery, Part III. Springer, Berlin, pp 143–150
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Agaba EA, Klair T, Ikedilo O, Vemulapalli P (2016) A 10-year review of surgical management of complicated peptic ulcer disease from a single center: is laparoscopic approach the future? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26(5):385–390CrossRef Agaba EA, Klair T, Ikedilo O, Vemulapalli P (2016) A 10-year review of surgical management of complicated peptic ulcer disease from a single center: is laparoscopic approach the future? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26(5):385–390CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Quan Y, Huang A, Ye M et al (2016) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer 19(3):939–950CrossRef Quan Y, Huang A, Ye M et al (2016) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer 19(3):939–950CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan S, Wu G, Zhuang Q, Xi Q, Meng Q, Jiang Y, Han Y, Yu C, Yu Z, Li N (2016) Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 33(Pt A):124–132CrossRef Tan S, Wu G, Zhuang Q, Xi Q, Meng Q, Jiang Y, Han Y, Yu C, Yu Z, Li N (2016) Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 33(Pt A):124–132CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Quah GS, Eslick GD, Cox MR (2019) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease has better outcomes than open repair. J Gastrointest Surg 23(3):618–625CrossRef Quah GS, Eslick GD, Cox MR (2019) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease has better outcomes than open repair. J Gastrointest Surg 23(3):618–625CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cirocchi R, Soreide K, Di Saverio S, Rossi E, Arezzo A, Zago M, Abraha I, Vettoretto N, Chiarugi M (2018) Meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of acute laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 85(2):417–425CrossRef Cirocchi R, Soreide K, Di Saverio S, Rossi E, Arezzo A, Zago M, Abraha I, Vettoretto N, Chiarugi M (2018) Meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of acute laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 85(2):417–425CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Paterson-Brown S (1993) Emergency laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 80:279–283CrossRef Paterson-Brown S (1993) Emergency laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 80:279–283CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic distal gastric and D1 resection for large perforated duodenal bulb peptic ulcer, with intracorporeal antecolic gastrojejunal anastomosis
verfasst von
Dimitrios Oikonomou
Elisa Bottazzoli
Dimitrios Damaskos
Salomone Di Saverio
Publikationsdatum
07.01.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 9/2022
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08955-4

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Akute Cholezystitis bei multimorbiden Älteren: Operation nicht sofort ausschließen!

Bei älteren, multimorbiden Menschen mit akuter Cholezystitis wird eine Operation häufig nicht erwogen. Eine Studie aus Philadelphia zeigt nun jedoch, dass auch diese Patientinnen und Patienten von einer chirurgischen Therapie profitieren können.

Was geschehen muss, damit Prähabilitation in die Leitlinien kommt

Eine Prähabilitation vor einem viszeralchirurgischen Eingriff ist Experten zufolge äußerst sinnvoll, dennoch wird sie in Leitlinien derzeit nicht empfohlen. Beim DCK erklärte Prof. Tim Vilz aus Bonn, woran das liegt und was benötigt wird, um die Situation zu ändern.

Thoracic-Outlet-Syndrom nur in Ausnahmefällen operieren!

Das Thoracic-Outlet-Syndrom erfordert nur in ganz bestimmten Fällen ein operatives Vorgehen. Beim DCK wurde vor schwerwiegenden Komplikationen des anspruchsvollen Eingriffs gewarnt.

Statine: Was der G-BA-Beschluss für Praxen bedeutet

Nach dem G-BA-Beschluss zur erweiterten Verordnungsfähigkeit von Lipidsenkern rechnet die DEGAM mit 200 bis 300 neuen Dauerpatienten pro Praxis. Im Interview erläutert Präsidiumsmitglied Erika Baum, wie Hausärztinnen und Hausärzte am besten vorgehen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.