Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 10/2017

01.08.2017 | Original Article

Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Cancer Provides Oncologic Outcomes and Overall Survival Identical to Open Distal Pancreatectomy

verfasst von: Olga Kantor, Darren S. Bryan, Mark S. Talamonti, Waseem Lutfi, Susan Sharpe, David J. Winchester, Richard A. Prinz, Marshall S. Baker

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 10/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has been shown to provide short-term clinical outcomes similar to open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for patients with benign tumors. Our aim was to better define oncologic outcomes and long-term survival profiles following LDP for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods

We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients with pathologic stage I–III PDAC who underwent distal pancreatectomy between 2010 and 2013. Logistic regression was performed to examine predictors of oncologic outcomes. Cox modeling was used for survival analysis and to estimate median overall survival (OS).

Results

One thousand five hundred fifty-four patients were included in the analysis. Patients undergoing LDP and ODP demonstrated identical probabilities of an adequate lymph node sampling and 90-day mortality. Those undergoing LDP demonstrated an increased probability of margin-negative resection (OR 1.78, CI 1.25–2.52) and a decreased probability of a prolonged hospital stay (OR 0.55, CI 0.32–0.95) or readmission (OR 0.56, CI 0.33–0.95) relative to those undergoing ODP. There was no difference in OS between groups (29.6 vs. 23.8 months, p = 0.10).

Conclusion

LDP is an effective modality for managing resectable cancer in the pancreatic body and tail. LDP provides short-term oncologic outcomes and long-term OS rates identical to those for ODP while affording an accelerated recovery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sulpice, L., O. Farges, N. Goutte, N. Bendersky, S. Dokmak, A. Sauvanet, and J.R. Delpero, Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: time for a randomized controlled trial? Results of an all-inclusive national observational study. Ann Surg, 2015. 262(5): p. 868–73; Discussion 873-4.CrossRefPubMed Sulpice, L., O. Farges, N. Goutte, N. Bendersky, S. Dokmak, A. Sauvanet, and J.R. Delpero, Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: time for a randomized controlled trial? Results of an all-inclusive national observational study. Ann Surg, 2015. 262(5): p. 868–73; Discussion 873-4.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Khaled, Y.S., D.J. Malde, J. Packer, N. De Liguori Carino, R. Deshpande, D.A. O'Reilly, D.J. Sherlock, and B.J. Ammori, A case-matched comparative study of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2015. 25(4): p. 363–7.CrossRefPubMed Khaled, Y.S., D.J. Malde, J. Packer, N. De Liguori Carino, R. Deshpande, D.A. O'Reilly, D.J. Sherlock, and B.J. Ammori, A case-matched comparative study of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2015. 25(4): p. 363–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung, J.C., H.C. Kim, and O.P. Song, Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign or borderline malignant pancreatic tumors. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2014. 25 Suppl 1: p. 162–6.PubMed Chung, J.C., H.C. Kim, and O.P. Song, Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign or borderline malignant pancreatic tumors. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2014. 25 Suppl 1: p. 162–6.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker, M.S., D.J. Bentrem, M.B. Ujiki, S. Stocker, and M.S. Talamonti, A prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surgery, 2009. 146(4): p. 635–43; Discussion 643-5.CrossRefPubMed Baker, M.S., D.J. Bentrem, M.B. Ujiki, S. Stocker, and M.S. Talamonti, A prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surgery, 2009. 146(4): p. 635–43; Discussion 643-5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker, M.S., K.L. Sherman, S. Stocker, A.V. Hayman, D.J. Bentrem, R.A. Prinz, and M.S. Talamonti, Defining quality for distal pancreatectomy: does the laparoscopic approach protect patients from poor quality outcomes? J Gastrointest Surg, 2013. 17(2): p. 273–80.CrossRefPubMed Baker, M.S., K.L. Sherman, S. Stocker, A.V. Hayman, D.J. Bentrem, R.A. Prinz, and M.S. Talamonti, Defining quality for distal pancreatectomy: does the laparoscopic approach protect patients from poor quality outcomes? J Gastrointest Surg, 2013. 17(2): p. 273–80.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharpe, S.M., M.S. Talamonti, E. Wang, D.J. Bentrem, K.K. Roggin, R.A. Prinz, R.D. Marsh, S.J. Stocker, D.J. Winchester, and M.S. Baker, The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma results in shorter lengths of stay without compromising oncologic outcomes. Am J Surg, 2015. 209(3): p. 557–63.CrossRefPubMed Sharpe, S.M., M.S. Talamonti, E. Wang, D.J. Bentrem, K.K. Roggin, R.A. Prinz, R.D. Marsh, S.J. Stocker, D.J. Winchester, and M.S. Baker, The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma results in shorter lengths of stay without compromising oncologic outcomes. Am J Surg, 2015. 209(3): p. 557–63.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Stauffer, J.A., A. Rosales-Velderrain, R.F. Goldberg, S.P. Bowers, and H.J. Asbun, Comparison of open with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single institution's transition over a 7-year period. HPB (Oxford), 2013. 15(2): p. 149–55.CrossRef Stauffer, J.A., A. Rosales-Velderrain, R.F. Goldberg, S.P. Bowers, and H.J. Asbun, Comparison of open with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single institution's transition over a 7-year period. HPB (Oxford), 2013. 15(2): p. 149–55.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin, S.H., S.C. Kim, K.B. Song, D.W. Hwang, J.H. Lee, D. Lee, J.W. Lee, E. Jun, K.M. Park, and Y.J. Lee, A comparative study of laparoscopic vs. open distal pancreatectomy for left-sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Am Coll Surg, 2015. 220(2): p. 177–85.CrossRefPubMed Shin, S.H., S.C. Kim, K.B. Song, D.W. Hwang, J.H. Lee, D. Lee, J.W. Lee, E. Jun, K.M. Park, and Y.J. Lee, A comparative study of laparoscopic vs. open distal pancreatectomy for left-sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Am Coll Surg, 2015. 220(2): p. 177–85.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Magge, D., W. Gooding, H. Choudry, J. Steve, J. Steel, A. Zureikat, A. Krasinskas, M. Daouadi, K.K. Lee, S.J. Hughes, H.J. Zeh, 3rd, and A.J. Moser, Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg, 2013. 148(6): p. 525–31.CrossRefPubMed Magge, D., W. Gooding, H. Choudry, J. Steve, J. Steel, A. Zureikat, A. Krasinskas, M. Daouadi, K.K. Lee, S.J. Hughes, H.J. Zeh, 3rd, and A.J. Moser, Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg, 2013. 148(6): p. 525–31.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Adam, M.A., K. Choudhury, P. Goffredo, S.D. Reed, D. Blazer, 3rd, S.A. Roman, and J.A. Sosa, Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for cancer: short-term oncologic outcomes in 1733 patients. World J Surg, 2015. 39(10): p. 2564–72.CrossRefPubMed Adam, M.A., K. Choudhury, P. Goffredo, S.D. Reed, D. Blazer, 3rd, S.A. Roman, and J.A. Sosa, Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for cancer: short-term oncologic outcomes in 1733 patients. World J Surg, 2015. 39(10): p. 2564–72.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria, K.Y., D.J. Bentrem, A.K. Stewart, D.P. Winchester, and C.Y. Ko, Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and non-approved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol, 2009. 27(25): p. 4177–81.CrossRefPubMed Bilimoria, K.Y., D.J. Bentrem, A.K. Stewart, D.P. Winchester, and C.Y. Ko, Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and non-approved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol, 2009. 27(25): p. 4177–81.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cancer, C.o., Facility Oncology Registry Data Standards (FORDS). 2012, Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons. Cancer, C.o., Facility Oncology Registry Data Standards (FORDS). 2012, Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Census, U., Statistical groupings of states and counties. 2010. Census, U., Statistical groupings of states and counties. 2010.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyo, R.A., D.C. Cherkin, and M.A. Ciol, Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol, 1992. 45(6): p. 613–9.CrossRefPubMed Deyo, R.A., D.C. Cherkin, and M.A. Ciol, Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol, 1992. 45(6): p. 613–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7 ed. 2010, Chicago, IL: Springer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7 ed. 2010, Chicago, IL: Springer.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran Cao, H.S., N. Lopez, D.C. Chang, A.M. Lowy, M. Bouvet, J.M. Baumgartner, M.A. Talamini, and J.K. Sicklick, Improved perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: results from a population-based analysis. JAMA Surg, 2014. 149(3): p. 237–43.CrossRefPubMed Tran Cao, H.S., N. Lopez, D.C. Chang, A.M. Lowy, M. Bouvet, J.M. Baumgartner, M.A. Talamini, and J.K. Sicklick, Improved perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: results from a population-based analysis. JAMA Surg, 2014. 149(3): p. 237–43.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehrabi, A., M. Hafezi, J. Arvin, M. Esmaeilzadeh, C. Garoussi, G. Emami, J. Kossler-Ebs, B.P. Muller-Stich, M.W. Buchler, T. Hackert, and M.K. Diener, A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it’s time to randomize. Surgery, 2015. 157(1): p. 45–55.CrossRefPubMed Mehrabi, A., M. Hafezi, J. Arvin, M. Esmaeilzadeh, C. Garoussi, G. Emami, J. Kossler-Ebs, B.P. Muller-Stich, M.W. Buchler, T. Hackert, and M.K. Diener, A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it’s time to randomize. Surgery, 2015. 157(1): p. 45–55.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jusoh, A.C. and B.J. Ammori, Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies. Surg Endosc, 2012. 26(4): p. 904–13.CrossRefPubMed Jusoh, A.C. and B.J. Ammori, Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies. Surg Endosc, 2012. 26(4): p. 904–13.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Venkat, R., B.H. Edil, R.D. Schulick, A.O. Lidor, M.A. Makary, and C.L. Wolfgang, Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg, 2012. 255(6): p. 1048–59.CrossRefPubMed Venkat, R., B.H. Edil, R.D. Schulick, A.O. Lidor, M.A. Makary, and C.L. Wolfgang, Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg, 2012. 255(6): p. 1048–59.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin, T., K. Altaf, J.J. Xiong, W. Huang, M.A. Javed, G. Mai, X.B. Liu, W.M. Hu, and Q. Xia, A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford), 2012. 14(11): p. 711–24.CrossRef Jin, T., K. Altaf, J.J. Xiong, W. Huang, M.A. Javed, G. Mai, X.B. Liu, W.M. Hu, and Q. Xia, A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford), 2012. 14(11): p. 711–24.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pericleous, S., N. Middleton, S.C. McKay, K.A. Bowers, and R.R. Hutchins, Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure? Pancreas, 2012. 41(7): p. 993–1000.CrossRefPubMed Pericleous, S., N. Middleton, S.C. McKay, K.A. Bowers, and R.R. Hutchins, Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure? Pancreas, 2012. 41(7): p. 993–1000.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kooby, D.A., W.G. Hawkins, C.M. Schmidt, S.M. Weber, D.J. Bentrem, T.W. Gillespie, J.B. Sellers, N.B. Merchant, C.R. Scoggins, R.C. Martin, 3rd, H.J. Kim, S. Ahmad, C.S. Cho, A.A. Parikh, C.K. Chu, N.A. Hamilton, C.J. Doyle, S. Pinchot, A. Hayman, R. McClaine, A. Nakeeb, C.A. Staley, K.M. McMasters, and K.D. Lillemoe, A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate? J Am Coll Surg, 2010. 210(5): p. 779–85, 786-7.CrossRefPubMed Kooby, D.A., W.G. Hawkins, C.M. Schmidt, S.M. Weber, D.J. Bentrem, T.W. Gillespie, J.B. Sellers, N.B. Merchant, C.R. Scoggins, R.C. Martin, 3rd, H.J. Kim, S. Ahmad, C.S. Cho, A.A. Parikh, C.K. Chu, N.A. Hamilton, C.J. Doyle, S. Pinchot, A. Hayman, R. McClaine, A. Nakeeb, C.A. Staley, K.M. McMasters, and K.D. Lillemoe, A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate? J Am Coll Surg, 2010. 210(5): p. 779–85, 786-7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rehman, S., S.K. John, R. Lochan, B.C. Jaques, D.M. Manas, R.M. Charnley, J.J. French, and S.A. White, Oncological feasibility of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: a single-institution comparative study. World J Surg, 2014. 38(2): p. 476–83.CrossRefPubMed Rehman, S., S.K. John, R. Lochan, B.C. Jaques, D.M. Manas, R.M. Charnley, J.J. French, and S.A. White, Oncological feasibility of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: a single-institution comparative study. World J Surg, 2014. 38(2): p. 476–83.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu, M., G. Zhao, F. Wang, Z. Zhao, C. Li, and R. Liu, Laparoscopic versus open distal splenopancreatectomy for the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer: a retrospective, mid-term follow-up study at a single academic tertiary care institution. Surg Endosc, 2014. 28(9): p. 2584–91.CrossRefPubMed Hu, M., G. Zhao, F. Wang, Z. Zhao, C. Li, and R. Liu, Laparoscopic versus open distal splenopancreatectomy for the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer: a retrospective, mid-term follow-up study at a single academic tertiary care institution. Surg Endosc, 2014. 28(9): p. 2584–91.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Merkow, R.P., K.Y. Bilimoria, J.S. Tomlinson, J.L. Paruch, J.B. Fleming, M.S. Talamonti, C.Y. Ko, and D.J. Bentrem, Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg, 2014. 260(2): p. 372–7.CrossRefPubMed Merkow, R.P., K.Y. Bilimoria, J.S. Tomlinson, J.L. Paruch, J.B. Fleming, M.S. Talamonti, C.Y. Ko, and D.J. Bentrem, Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg, 2014. 260(2): p. 372–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Cancer Provides Oncologic Outcomes and Overall Survival Identical to Open Distal Pancreatectomy
verfasst von
Olga Kantor
Darren S. Bryan
Mark S. Talamonti
Waseem Lutfi
Susan Sharpe
David J. Winchester
Richard A. Prinz
Marshall S. Baker
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 10/2017
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3506-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2017

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 10/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.