Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
World Journal of Surgery
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 2/2019

19.10.2018 | Original Scientific Report (including Papers Presented at Surgical Conferences)

Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus Open Hepatectomy for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study Using a Propensity Score Matching

verfasst von: Xavier Untereiner, Audrey Cagniet, Riccardo Memeo, Zineb Cherkaoui, Tullio Piardi, François Severac, Didier Mutter, Reza Kianmanesh, Taiga Wakabayashi, Daniele Sommacale, Patrick Pessaux

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the results between laparoscopic hepatectomy and open hepatectomy in two French university hospitals, for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a propensity score matching.

Materials and methods

A patient in the laparoscopic surgery group (LA) was randomly matched with another patient in the open approach group (OA) using a 1:1 allocated ratio with the nearest estimated propensity score. Matching criteria included age, presence of comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and resection type (major or minor). Patients of the LA group without matches were excluded. Intraoperative and postoperative data were compared in both groups. Survival was compared in both groups using the following matching criteria: number and size of lesions, alpha-fetoprotein rate, and cell differentiation.

Results

From January 2012 to January 2017, a total of 447 hepatectomies were consecutively performed, 99 hepatectomies of which were performed for the management of hepatocellular carcinomas. Forty-nine resections were performed among the open approach (OA) group (49%), and 50 resections were performed among the laparoscopic surgery (LA) group (51%). Mortality rate was 2% in the LA group and 4.1% in the OA group. After propensity score matching, there was a statistical difference favorable to the LA group regarding medical complications (54.55% versus 27.27%, p = 0.04), and operating times were shorter (p = 0.03). Resection rate R0 was similar between both groups: 90.91% (n = 30) in the LA group and 84.85% (n =) in the OA group. There was no difference regarding overall survival (p = 0.98) and recurrence-free survival (p = 0.42).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic liver resection for the management of HCC seems to provide the same short-term and long-term results as compared to the open approach. Laparoscopic liver resections could be considered as an alternative and become the gold standard in well-selected patients.
Literatur
1.
Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, Chang S, Van Nhieu JT, Loriau J et al (2006) Laparoscopic liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: midterm results and perspectives. Ann Surg 243(4):499–506CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Belli G, Fantini C, Belli A, Limongelli P (2011) Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: long-term outcomes. Dig Surg 28(2):134–140CrossRefPubMed
3.
Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127(12):2893–2917CrossRef
4.
5.
Parks KR, Kuo Y-H, Davis JM, O’ Brien B, Hagopian EJ (2014) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a meta-analysis of long-term outcome. HPB 16(2):109–18
6.
Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2008) Laparoscopic liver resection for cancer. Future Oncol Lond Engl 4(5):661–670CrossRef
7.
Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMed
8.
Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629PubMed
9.
Tranchart H, Dagher I (2014) Laparoscopic liver resection: a review. J Visc Surg 151(2):107–115CrossRefPubMed
10.
Mala T, Edwin B, Gladhaug I, Fosse E, Søreide O, Bergan A et al (2002) A comparative study of the short-term outcome following open and laparoscopic liver resection of colorectal metastases. Surg Endosc 16(7):1059–1063CrossRefPubMed
11.
Bruix J, Sherman M (2005) Practice Guidelines Committee, American association for the study of liver diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Baltim Md 42(5):1208–1236
12.
Bruix J, Sherman M (2011) American Association for the study of liver diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatol Baltim Md 53(3):1020–1022
13.
Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S, Kakazu T (1995) Criteria for safe hepatic resection. Am J Surg 169(6):589–594CrossRefPubMed
14.
Untereiner X, Cagnet A, Memeo R, De Blasi V, Tzedakis S, Piardi T et al (2016) Short-term and middle-term evaluation of laparoscopic hepatectomies compared with open hepatectomies: a propensity score matching analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 8:643–650CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Untereiner X, Cagniet A, Memeo R, Tzedakis S, Piardi T, Severac F et al (2016) Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: comparative study with propensity score matching. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5:290–299CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
17.
Couinaud C (1980) Definition of hepatic anatomical regions and their value during hepatectomy (author’s transl). Chir Mem Acad Chir 106(2):103–108
18.
Strasberg SM, Phillips C (2013) Use and dissemination of the brisbane 2000 nomenclature of liver anatomy and resections. Ann Surg 257(3):377–382CrossRefPubMed
19.
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRef
20.
Wong S, Huynh D, Zhang F, Nguyen NQ (2017) Use of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio to reduce the need for FibroScan in the evaluation of liver fibrosis. World J Hepatol 9(17):791–796CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Hung H-H, Su C-W, Lai C-R, Chau G-Y, Chan C-C, Huang Y-H et al (2010) Fibrosis and AST to platelet ratio index predict post-operative prognosis for solitary small hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int 4(4):691–699CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Lin Z-H, Xin Y-N, Dong Q-J, Wang Q, Jiang X-J, Zhan S-H et al (2011) Performance of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index for the staging of hepatitis C-related fibrosis: an updated meta-analysis. Hepatol Baltim Md 53(3):726–736CrossRef
23.
Singh A, Le P, Peerzada MM, Lopez R, Alkhouri N (2018) The utility of noninvasive scores in assessing the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced fibrosis in type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 52(3):268–272PubMed
24.
Cheng J, Zhao P, Liu J, Liu X, Wu X (2016) Preoperative aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) is a predictor on postoperative outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(48):e5486CrossRef
25.
Shen S-L, Fu S-J, Chen B, Kuang M, Li S-Q, Hua Y-P et al (2014) Preoperative aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio is an independent prognostic factor for hepatitis B-induced hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection. Ann Surg Oncol 21(12):3802–3809CrossRefPubMed
26.
D’Agostino RB (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17(19):2265–2281CrossRef
27.
Austin PC (2010) Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score. Am J Epidemiol 172(9):1092–1097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Steiner PM, Cook TD, Shadish WR, Clark MH (2010) The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies. Psychol Methods 15:250–267CrossRefPubMed
29.
Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, Andreola S, Pulvirenti A, Bozzetti F et al (1996) Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 334(11):693–699CrossRef
30.
European Association For The Study Of The Liver, European Organisation For Research And Treatment Of Cancer (2012) EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56(4):908–943CrossRef
31.
Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC et al (2009) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg 250(5):856–860CrossRefPubMed
32.
Dagher I, Di Giuro G, Dubrez J, Lainas P, Smadja C, Franco D (2009) Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study. Am J Surg 198(2):173–177CrossRefPubMed
33.
Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B (2015) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in elderly patients: a single-center, case-matched study. Surg Endosc 29(6):1368–1375CrossRefPubMed
34.
Cheung TT, Han HS, She WH, Chen KH, Chow PKH, Yoong BK et al (2018) The Asia Pacific consensus statement on laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a report from the 7th Asia-Pacific primary liver cancer expert meeting held in Hong Kong. Liver Cancer 7(1):28–39CrossRefPubMed
35.
Soubrane O, Goumard C, Laurent A, Tranchart H, Truant S, Gayet B et al (2014) Laparoscopic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a French survey in 351 patients. HPB 16(4):357–365CrossRefPubMed
36.
Elias D, Desruennes E, Lasser P (1991) Prolonged intermittent clamping of the portal triad during hepatectomy. Br J Surg 78(1):42–44CrossRefPubMed
37.
Wu CC, Hwang CR, Liu TJ, P’eng FK (1996) Effects and limitations of prolonged intermittent ischaemia for hepatic resection of the cirrhotic liver. Br J Surg 83(1):121–124
38.
Belghiti J, Noun R, Malafosse R, Jagot P, Sauvanet A, Pierangeli F et al (1999) Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection: a controlled study. Ann Surg 229(3):369–375CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
De Carlis L, Di Sandro S, Giacomoni A, Mihaylov P, Lauterio A, Mangoni I, et al. (2013) Colorectal liver metastases: hepatic pedicle clamping during hepatectomy reduces the incidence of tumor recurrence in selected patients. Case-matched analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol 39(7):726–733
40.
Morise Z, Sugioka A, Kawabe N, Umemoto S, Nagata H, Ohshima H et al (2011) Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with severe liver cirrhosis. Asian J Endosc Surg 4(3):143–146CrossRefPubMed
41.
Belli G, Limongelli P, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Cioffi L, Belli A et al (2009) Laparoscopic and open treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Br J Surg 96(9):1041–1048CrossRefPubMed
42.
Aldrighetti L, Guzzetti E, Pulitanò C, Cipriani F, Catena M, Paganelli M, et al. (2010) Case-matched analysis of totally laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC: short and middle term results. J Surg Oncol 102(1):82–86
43.
Dagher I, Belli G, Fantini C, Laurent A, Tayar C, Lainas P et al (2010) Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a European experience. J Am Coll Surg 211(1):16–23CrossRefPubMed
44.
Mbah NA, Brown RE, Bower MR, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM, Martin RCG (2012) Differences between bipolar compression and ultrasonic devices for parenchymal transection during laparoscopic liver resection. HPB 14(2):126–131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Gayet B, Cavaliere D, Vibert E, Perniceni T, Levard H, Denet C et al (2007) Totally laparoscopic right hepatectomy. Am J Surg 194(5):685–689CrossRefPubMed
46.
Cho A, Yamamoto H, Nagata M, Takiguchi N, Shimada H, Kainuma O et al (2009) Safe and feasible inflow occlusion in laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc 23(4):906–908CrossRefPubMed
47.
Troisi RI, Van Huysse J, Berrevoet F, Vandenbossche B, Sainz-Barriga M, Vinci A et al (2011) Evolution of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy without the Pringle maneuver: through resection of benign and malignant tumors to living liver donation. Surg Endosc 25(1):79–87CrossRefPubMed
48.
Tranchart H, O’Rourke N, Van Dam R, Gaillard M, Lainas P, Sugioka A et al (2015) Bleeding control during laparoscopic liver resection: a review of literature. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 22(5):371–378CrossRef
49.
Dagher I, Proske JM, Carloni A, Richa H, Tranchart H, Franco D (2007) Laparoscopic liver resection: results for 70 patients. Surg Endosc 21(4):619–624CrossRefPubMed
50.
Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Vandeweyer H, Penninckx F (2008) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection of hepatic neoplasms: comparative analysis of short-term results. Surg Endosc 22(10):2208–2213CrossRefPubMed
51.
Mala T, Edwin B, Rosseland AR, Gladhaug I, Fosse E, Mathisen O (2005) Laparoscopic liver resection: experience of 53 procedures at a single center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12(4):298–303CrossRefPubMed
52.
Xu H-W, Liu F, Li H-Y, Wei Y-G, Li B (2018) Outcomes following laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 32:712–719CrossRefPubMed
53.
Cheung TT, Dai WC, Tsang SHY, Chan ACY, Chok KSH, Chan SC et al (2016) Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in 110 patients with liver cirrhosis: a propensity analysis at a single center. Ann Surg 264(4):612–620CrossRefPubMed
54.
Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Konno H, Gotoh M, Yamaue H, Yanaga K et al (2016) Comparison of laparoscopic major hepatectomy with propensity score matched open cases from the National Clinical Database in Japan. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 23(11):721–734CrossRef
55.
Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Beppu T, Aihara A, Hasegawa K, Gotohda N et al (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 22(10):721–727CrossRef
56.
Sposito C, Battiston C, Facciorusso A, Mazzola M, Muscarà C, Scotti M et al (2016) Propensity score analysis of outcomes following laparoscopic or open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 103(7):871–880CrossRefPubMed
57.
Han DH, Choi SH, Park EJ, Kang DR, Choi GH, Choi JS (2016) Surgical outcomes after laparoscopic or robotic liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis with conventional open liver resection. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS 12(4):735–742
58.
Meguro M, Mizuguchi T, Kawamoto M, Ota S, Ishii M, Nishidate T et al (2015) Clinical comparison of laparoscopic and open liver resection after propensity matching selection. Surgery 158(3):573–587CrossRefPubMed
59.
Ahn KS, Kang KJ, Kim YH, Kim T-S, Lim TJ (2014) A propensity score-matched case-control comparative study of laparoscopic and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24(12):872–827
60.
Kim H, Suh K-S, Lee K-W, Yi N-J, Hong G, Suh S-W et al (2014) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-controlled study with propensity score matching. Surg Endosc 28(3):950–960CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus Open Hepatectomy for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study Using a Propensity Score Matching
verfasst von
Xavier Untereiner
Audrey Cagniet
Riccardo Memeo
Zineb Cherkaoui
Tullio Piardi
François Severac
Didier Mutter
Reza Kianmanesh
Taiga Wakabayashi
Daniele Sommacale
Patrick Pessaux
Publikationsdatum
19.10.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4827-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

World Journal of Surgery 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Original Scientific Report

Variation in Classification and Postoperative Management of Complex Appendicitis: A European Survey

Original Scientific Report (including Papers Presented at Surgical Conferences)

Sustained Elevation of Postoperative Serum Level of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 is High-Risk Stigmata for Primary Hepatic Recurrence in Patients with Curatively Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Original Scientific Report

Cost Analysis of the Mongolian ATLS© Program: A Framework for Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Innovative Surgical Techniques Around the World

Robotic Double Purse-String Telescoped Pancreaticogastrostomy: How I Do It

Original Scientific Report

The Impact of Prior Laparotomy and Intra-abdominal Adhesions on Bowel and Mesenteric Injury Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Original Scientific Report

Surgical and Long-Term Survival Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 | Infektiologie | Nachrichten

Kein Abstrich bei chronischen Wunden ohne Entzündungszeichen!

10.04.2024 | Postoperative Schmerztherapie | Nachrichten

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.