Skip to main content
main-content

12.11.2018 | Original Article | Ausgabe 3/2019

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2019

Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Score—a Validation Study

Zeitschrift:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery > Ausgabe 3/2019
Autoren:
Ser Yee Lee, Brian K. P. Goh, Gholami Sepideh, John C. Allen, Ryan P. Merkow, Jin Yao Teo, Deepa Chandra, Ye Xin Koh, Ek Khoon Tan, Juinn Haur Kam, Peng Chung Cheow, Pierce K. H. Chow, London L. P. J. Ooi, Alexander Y. F. Chung, Michael I. D’Angelica, William R. Jarnagin, T. Peter Kingham, Chung Yip Chan
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11605-018-4036-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The study findings was previously presented as an oral presentation at the 1st World Congress of the International Laparoscopic Liver Society (ILLS), Paris 2017.

Abstract

Objective(s)

The technical complexity of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) poses unique challenges distinct from open surgery. An objective scoring system was developed that preoperatively quantifies the difficulty of LRR to help guide surgeon decision-making regarding the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive approaches. The aim of this multiinstitutional study was to externally validate this scoring system.

Methods

Patients who underwent LLR at two institutions were reviewed. LLR difficulty score (LDS) was calculated based on patient, tumor, and anatomic characteristics by two independent, blinded hepatobiliary surgeons. Surrogates of case complexity (e.g., conversion rate, operative time) were used for validation of this index.

Results

From 2006 to 2016, 444 LLR were scored as low (n = 94), intermediate (n = 98), and high difficulty (n = 152) with respective conversion rates of 5.3%, 15.7%, and 25%. Cases of higher LDS correlated with larger mean blood loss (203 ml vs. 331 ml vs. 635 ml). Mean operative and Pringle maneuver used were associated with increasing LDS (155 min vs. 202 min vs. 315 min and 14.4% vs. 29.7% vs. 45.1% respectively). These operative surrogates of difficulty correlated significantly with the LDS (all p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

This comprehensive external validation of the LDS is robust and applicable in diverse patient populations. This LDS serves as a useful objective predictor of technical difficulty for LLR to help surgeons in selecting patients according to their individual operative experience and is valuable for preoperative risk estimation and stratification in randomized trials.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Zusatzmaterial
Nur für berechtigte Nutzer zugänglich
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Sie können e.Med Chirurgie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Chirurgie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise