Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2020

16.07.2019 | Laparoscopy

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients

verfasst von: Yun Liang, Liting Zhao, Chongyi Jiang, Pengfei Hu, Hongwei Wang, Zhiwei Cai, Wei Wang

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in elderly patients by short-term surgical effects.

Methods

We retrospectively collected clinical data of 55 non-elderly patients (< 70 years), 27 elderly patients (≥ 70 years) underwent LPD, and 19 elderly patients underwent open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in biliopancreatic surgery department of Huadong Hospital, affiliated to Fudan University, from Jan 2015 to Jan 2018. Patients were divided into 3 groups: LPD aged < 70 years, LPD aged ≥ 70 years, and OPD aged ≥ 70 years, according to their age at admission and surgical approach in order to compare baseline characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes.

Results

Totally 101 patients were included in this study; 59 cases were male; 42 cases were female; mean age was 66 years old. Elderly LPD patients seemed to have higher overall morbidity (41% vs. 20%, P = 0.05) compared to non-elderly patients. This difference is even more significant in our multivariable analysis model with an odds ratio of 4.48 (95% CI 1.31–17.87, P = 0.018). The 90-days mortality, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and post-operative hospital stay (POHS) were similar in two groups. Elderly LPD patients had less EBL and shorter POHS than elderly OPD patients. However, the mortality and morbidity rate were comparable in these two groups.

Conclusions

Aging patients have higher overall morbidity than younger patients in LPD. However, for aging population who need to undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy, LPD might have some advantages over OPD.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodul P, Tansey J, Golts E, Oh D, Pickleman J, Aranha GV (2001) Age is not a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am Surg 67(3):270–275PubMed Hodul P, Tansey J, Golts E, Oh D, Pickleman J, Aranha GV (2001) Age is not a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am Surg 67(3):270–275PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Chang D, Cunningham SC, Riall TS, Yeo CJ (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10(3):347–356CrossRef Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Chang D, Cunningham SC, Riall TS, Yeo CJ (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10(3):347–356CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Brozzetti S, Mazzoni G, Miccini M, Puma F, De Angelis M, Cassini D, Bettelli E, Tocchi A, Cavallaro A (2006) Surgical treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma in elderly patients. Arch Surg 141(2):137–142CrossRef Brozzetti S, Mazzoni G, Miccini M, Puma F, De Angelis M, Cassini D, Bettelli E, Tocchi A, Cavallaro A (2006) Surgical treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma in elderly patients. Arch Surg 141(2):137–142CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Coolsen MM, Bakens M, van Dam RM, Olde Damink SW, Dejong CH (2015) Implementing an enhanced recovery program after pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: is it feasible? World J Surg 39(1):251–258CrossRef Coolsen MM, Bakens M, van Dam RM, Olde Damink SW, Dejong CH (2015) Implementing an enhanced recovery program after pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: is it feasible? World J Surg 39(1):251–258CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ito Y, Kenmochi T, Irino T, Egawa T, Hayashi S, Nagashima A, Kitagawa Y (2011) The impact of surgical outcome after pancrea- ticoduodenectomy in elderly patients. World J Surg Oncol 9:102CrossRef Ito Y, Kenmochi T, Irino T, Egawa T, Hayashi S, Nagashima A, Kitagawa Y (2011) The impact of surgical outcome after pancrea- ticoduodenectomy in elderly patients. World J Surg Oncol 9:102CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Futagawa Y, Kanehira M, Furukawa K, Kitamura H, Yoshida S, Usuba T, Misawa T, Ishida Y, Okamoto T, Yanaga K (2017) Study on the Validity of Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Elderly. Anticancer Res 37(9):5309–5316PubMed Futagawa Y, Kanehira M, Furukawa K, Kitamura H, Yoshida S, Usuba T, Misawa T, Ishida Y, Okamoto T, Yanaga K (2017) Study on the Validity of Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Elderly. Anticancer Res 37(9):5309–5316PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen Ying-Tai, Ma Fu-Hai, Wang Cheng-Feng, Zhao Dong-Bing, Zhang Ya-Wei, Tian Yan-Tao (2018) Elderly patients had more severe postoperative complications after pancreatic resection: a retrospective analysis of 727 patients. World J Gastroenterol 24(7):844–851CrossRef Chen Ying-Tai, Ma Fu-Hai, Wang Cheng-Feng, Zhao Dong-Bing, Zhang Ya-Wei, Tian Yan-Tao (2018) Elderly patients had more severe postoperative complications after pancreatic resection: a retrospective analysis of 727 patients. World J Gastroenterol 24(7):844–851CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stauffer JA, Coppola A, Villacreses D, Mody K, Johnson E, Li Z, Asbun HJ (2016) Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution. Surg Endosc 31(5):2233–2241CrossRef Stauffer JA, Coppola A, Villacreses D, Mody K, Johnson E, Li Z, Asbun HJ (2016) Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution. Surg Endosc 31(5):2233–2241CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260(4):633–638CrossRef Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260(4):633–638CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M, Yamaguchi T (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13(9):1614–1618CrossRef Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M, Yamaguchi T (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13(9):1614–1618CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Souche R, Fuks D, Perinel J, Herrero A, Guillon F, Pirlet I, Perniceni T, Borie F, Cunha AS, Gayet B, Fabre JM (2018) Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study. Surg Endosc 32(7):3164–3173CrossRef Souche R, Fuks D, Perinel J, Herrero A, Guillon F, Pirlet I, Perniceni T, Borie F, Cunha AS, Gayet B, Fabre JM (2018) Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study. Surg Endosc 32(7):3164–3173CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahakyan MA, Edwin B, Kazaryan AM, Barkhatov L, Buanes T, Ignjatovic D, Labori KJ, Rosok BI (2017) Perioperative outcomes and survival in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24(1):42–48CrossRef Sahakyan MA, Edwin B, Kazaryan AM, Barkhatov L, Buanes T, Ignjatovic D, Labori KJ, Rosok BI (2017) Perioperative outcomes and survival in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24(1):42–48CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Adham M, Bredt LC, Robert M, Perinel J, Lombard-Bohas C, Pon- chon T, Valette PJ (2014) Pancreatic resection in elderly patients: should it be denied? Langenbecks Arch Surg 399(4):449–459CrossRef Adham M, Bredt LC, Robert M, Perinel J, Lombard-Bohas C, Pon- chon T, Valette PJ (2014) Pancreatic resection in elderly patients: should it be denied? Langenbecks Arch Surg 399(4):449–459CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 161(3):584–591CrossRef Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 161(3):584–591CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami M, Shimizu J, Koga C, Hitora T, Kawabata R, Oda N, Hirota M, Yoshikawa M, Morishima H, Ikenaga M, Matsunami N, Hasegawa J (2015) Analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy for elderly patients aged 75 years or older. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 42(12):2351–2353PubMed Murakami M, Shimizu J, Koga C, Hitora T, Kawabata R, Oda N, Hirota M, Yoshikawa M, Morishima H, Ikenaga M, Matsunami N, Hasegawa J (2015) Analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy for elderly patients aged 75 years or older. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 42(12):2351–2353PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen K, Pan Y, Liu XL, Jiang GY, Wu D, Maher H, Cai XJ (2017) Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outomes compared with open surgery. BMC Gastroenterol 17(1):120CrossRef Chen K, Pan Y, Liu XL, Jiang GY, Wu D, Maher H, Cai XJ (2017) Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outomes compared with open surgery. BMC Gastroenterol 17(1):120CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pędziwiatr M, Małczak P, Pisarska M, Major P, Wysocki M, Stefura T, Budzyński A (2017) Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402(5):841–851CrossRef Pędziwiatr M, Małczak P, Pisarska M, Major P, Wysocki M, Stefura T, Budzyński A (2017) Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402(5):841–851CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou J, Xin C, Xia T, Mou Y, Xu X, Zhang R, Zhou Y, Jin W, Lu C (2017) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in A-92-older Chinese patient for cancer of head of the pancreas: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(3):e5962CrossRef Zhou J, Xin C, Xia T, Mou Y, Xu X, Zhang R, Zhou Y, Jin W, Lu C (2017) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in A-92-older Chinese patient for cancer of head of the pancreas: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(3):e5962CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kannan U, Reddy VS, Mukerji AN, Parithivel VS, Shah AK, Gilchrist BF, Farkas DT (2015) Laparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in elderly patients: insights from the American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. World J Gastroenterol 21(45):12843–12850CrossRef Kannan U, Reddy VS, Mukerji AN, Parithivel VS, Shah AK, Gilchrist BF, Farkas DT (2015) Laparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in elderly patients: insights from the American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. World J Gastroenterol 21(45):12843–12850CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapman BC, Gajdos C, Hosokawa P, Henderson W, Paniccia A, Overbey DM, Gleisner A, Schulick RD, McCarter MD, Edil BH (2018) Comparison of laparoscopic to open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 28(1):56–61 Chapman BC, Gajdos C, Hosokawa P, Henderson W, Paniccia A, Overbey DM, Gleisner A, Schulick RD, McCarter MD, Edil BH (2018) Comparison of laparoscopic to open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 28(1):56–61
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagakawa Y, Nakamura Y, Honda G, Gotoh Y, Ohtsuka T, Ban D, Nakata K, Sahara Y, Velasquez VVDM, Takaori K, Misawa T, Kuroki T, Kawai M, Morikawa T, Yamaue H, Tanabe M, Mou Y, Lee WJ, Shrikhande SV, Conrad C, Han HS, Tang CN, Palanivelu C, Kooby DA, Asbun HJ, Wakabayashi G, Tsuchida A, Takada T, Yamamoto M, Nakamura M (2018) Learning curve and surgical factors influencing the surgical outcome during the initial experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25(11):498–507CrossRef Nagakawa Y, Nakamura Y, Honda G, Gotoh Y, Ohtsuka T, Ban D, Nakata K, Sahara Y, Velasquez VVDM, Takaori K, Misawa T, Kuroki T, Kawai M, Morikawa T, Yamaue H, Tanabe M, Mou Y, Lee WJ, Shrikhande SV, Conrad C, Han HS, Tang CN, Palanivelu C, Kooby DA, Asbun HJ, Wakabayashi G, Tsuchida A, Takada T, Yamamoto M, Nakamura M (2018) Learning curve and surgical factors influencing the surgical outcome during the initial experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25(11):498–507CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients
verfasst von
Yun Liang
Liting Zhao
Chongyi Jiang
Pengfei Hu
Hongwei Wang
Zhiwei Cai
Wei Wang
Publikationsdatum
16.07.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06982-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.