Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2016

21.06.2016 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy combined with a novel self-assessment system and feedback discussion: a phase 1 surgical trial following the IDEAL guidelines

verfasst von: Yosuke Inoue, Akio Saiura, Takafumi Sato, Takeaki Ishizawa, Junichi Arita, Yu Takahashi, Naoki Hiki, Takeshi Sano, Toshiharu Yamaguchi

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard yet complicated procedure for periampullary tumors. To introduce a laparoscopic approach for PD (Lap-PD), a robust and objective assessment system to evaluate the quality of this approach is needed. We describe a phase 1 surgical trial of Lap-PD (Registration ID: UMIN000015328) as a triad of surgery, novel self-assessment system, and feedback discussion implementing the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term study (IDEAL) guidelines.

Methods

This was a surgical phase I trial (corresponding to IDEAL stage 1) approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital. The resection sequence was divided into 10 parts that were assessed and classified into one of four grades of achievement. Evaluation of each part was then integrated, and the whole Lap-PD was categorized into three grades of achievement. We set discontinuance criteria based on historical surgical outcome of open PD. The previous case was discussed before each new case, and measures to overcome problems were implemented. Five patients underwent Lap-PD.

Results

All Lap-PDs were completed laparoscopically and reconstructed via mini-laparotomy. One patient suffered recurrent ileus requiring re-laparotomy to resolve a severe adhesion. After 1 year, no patient suffered disease recurrence or complication. Based on the self-assessment system, four Lap-PDs were successful, whereas one was rated as feasible owing to bleeding requiring conversion of resection sequence.

Conclusions

Our triad system for evaluating Lap-PD could be a useful tool for the safe introduction and maintenance of Lap-PD.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Madhankumar MV (2007) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 205:222–230CrossRefPubMed Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Madhankumar MV (2007) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 205:222–230CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Takaori K, Tanigawa N (2007) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: the past, present, and future. Surg Today 37:535–545CrossRefPubMed Takaori K, Tanigawa N (2007) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: the past, present, and future. Surg Today 37:535–545CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho A, Yamamoto H, Nagata M, Takiguchi N, Shimada H, Kainuma O, et al. (2009) Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease. Am J Surg 198:445–449CrossRefPubMed Cho A, Yamamoto H, Nagata M, Takiguchi N, Shimada H, Kainuma O, et al. (2009) Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease. Am J Surg 198:445–449CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, et al. (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260:633–638 discussion 8-40CrossRefPubMed Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, et al. (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260:633–638 discussion 8-40CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Speicher PJ, Nussbaum DP, White RR, Zani S, Mosca PJ, Blazer DG 3rd, et al. (2014) Defining the learning curve for team-based laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 21:4014–4019CrossRefPubMed Speicher PJ, Nussbaum DP, White RR, Zani S, Mosca PJ, Blazer DG 3rd, et al. (2014) Defining the learning curve for team-based laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 21:4014–4019CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145:19–23CrossRefPubMed Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145:19–23CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2012a) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg 215:810–819CrossRefPubMed Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2012a) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg 215:810–819CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang CM, Lee SH, Chung MJ, Hwang HK, Lee WJ (2015) Laparoscopic pancreatic reconstruction technique following laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:202–210CrossRefPubMed Kang CM, Lee SH, Chung MJ, Hwang HK, Lee WJ (2015) Laparoscopic pancreatic reconstruction technique following laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:202–210CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennell CP, Hirst AD, Campbell WB, Sood A, Agha RA, Barkun JS, McCulloch P (2016) Practical guide to the idea, development and exploration stages of the IDEAL framework and recommendations. Br J Surg 103:607–615. doi:10.1002/bjs.10115 CrossRefPubMed Pennell CP, Hirst AD, Campbell WB, Sood A, Agha RA, Barkun JS, McCulloch P (2016) Practical guide to the idea, development and exploration stages of the IDEAL framework and recommendations. Br J Surg 103:607–615. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​10115 CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Menon M, Abaza R, Sood A, Ahlawat R, Ghani KR, Jeong W, Kher V, Kumar RK, Bhandari M (2014) Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: evolution of a novel procedure utilizing the IDEAL guidelines (IDEAL phase 0 and 1). Eur Urol 65:1001–1009. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.011 CrossRefPubMed Menon M, Abaza R, Sood A, Ahlawat R, Ghani KR, Jeong W, Kher V, Kumar RK, Bhandari M (2014) Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: evolution of a novel procedure utilizing the IDEAL guidelines (IDEAL phase 0 and 1). Eur Urol 65:1001–1009. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2013.​11.​011 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakita A, Takahashi T, Yoshida M, Furuta K (1996) A simpler and more reliable technique of pancreatojejunal anastomosis. Surg Today 26:532–535CrossRefPubMed Kakita A, Takahashi T, Yoshida M, Furuta K (1996) A simpler and more reliable technique of pancreatojejunal anastomosis. Surg Today 26:532–535CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, et al. (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, et al. (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue Y, Saiura A, Yoshioka R, Ono Y, Takahashi M, Arita J, et al. (2015) Pancreatoduodenectomy with systematic mesopancreas dissection using a supracolic anterior artery-first approach. Ann Surg 262:1092–1101CrossRefPubMed Inoue Y, Saiura A, Yoshioka R, Ono Y, Takahashi M, Arita J, et al. (2015) Pancreatoduodenectomy with systematic mesopancreas dissection using a supracolic anterior artery-first approach. Ann Surg 262:1092–1101CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurosaki I, Minagawa M, Takano K, Takizawa K, Hatakeyama K (2011) Left posterior approach to the superior mesenteric vascular pedicle in pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the pancreatic head. JOP 12:220–229PubMed Kurosaki I, Minagawa M, Takano K, Takizawa K, Hatakeyama K (2011) Left posterior approach to the superior mesenteric vascular pedicle in pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the pancreatic head. JOP 12:220–229PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Zureikat AH, Breaux JA, Steel JL, Hughes SJ (2011) Can laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy be safely implemented? J Gastrointest Surg 15:1151–1157CrossRefPubMed Zureikat AH, Breaux JA, Steel JL, Hughes SJ (2011) Can laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy be safely implemented? J Gastrointest Surg 15:1151–1157CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Adam M, Choudhury K, Dinan MA, Reed S, Scheri R, Blazer D, et al. (2015) Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer. Practice patterns and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients. Ann Surg 262:372–377CrossRefPubMed Adam M, Choudhury K, Dinan MA, Reed S, Scheri R, Blazer D, et al. (2015) Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer. Practice patterns and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients. Ann Surg 262:372–377CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, et al. (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc 29:9–23CrossRefPubMed Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, et al. (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc 29:9–23CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KB, Kim SC, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Lee DJ, Lee JW, et al. (2015) Matched case-control analysis comparing laparoscopic and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with periampullary tumors. Ann Surg 262:146–155CrossRefPubMed Song KB, Kim SC, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Lee DJ, Lee JW, et al. (2015) Matched case-control analysis comparing laparoscopic and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with periampullary tumors. Ann Surg 262:146–155CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dokmak S, Fteriche FS, Aussilhou B, Bensafta Y, Levy P, Ruszniewski P, et al. (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. J Am Coll Surg 220:831–838CrossRefPubMed Dokmak S, Fteriche FS, Aussilhou B, Bensafta Y, Levy P, Ruszniewski P, et al. (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. J Am Coll Surg 220:831–838CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Begg CB, Berlin JA (1989) Publication bias and dissemination of clinical research. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:107–115CrossRefPubMed Begg CB, Berlin JA (1989) Publication bias and dissemination of clinical research. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:107–115CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Dickersin K (1990) The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. J Am Med Assoc 263:1385–1389CrossRef Dickersin K (1990) The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. J Am Med Assoc 263:1385–1389CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF, Zayaruzny M, Litwin DE, Sullivan ME, et al. (2007) Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg 246:246–253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF, Zayaruzny M, Litwin DE, Sullivan ME, et al. (2007) Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg 246:246–253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, et al. (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 242:781–788 discussion 8-90CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, et al. (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 242:781–788 discussion 8-90CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, de Hingh IH, van Eijck CH, Dejong CH, et al. (2012) Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg 99:404–410CrossRefPubMed de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, de Hingh IH, van Eijck CH, Dejong CH, et al. (2012) Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg 99:404–410CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Topal B, Van de Sande S, Fieuws S, Penninckx F (2007) Effect of centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on nationwide hospital mortality and length of stay. Br J Surg 94:1377–1381CrossRefPubMed Topal B, Van de Sande S, Fieuws S, Penninckx F (2007) Effect of centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on nationwide hospital mortality and length of stay. Br J Surg 94:1377–1381CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Joseph B, Morton JM, Hernandez-Boussard T, Rubinfeld I, Faraj C, Velanovich V (2009) Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection. J Am Coll Surg 208:520–527CrossRefPubMed Joseph B, Morton JM, Hernandez-Boussard T, Rubinfeld I, Faraj C, Velanovich V (2009) Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection. J Am Coll Surg 208:520–527CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Stitzenberg KB, Sigurdson ER, Egleston BL, Starkey RB, Meropol NJ (2009) Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care. J Clin Oncol 27:4671–4678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stitzenberg KB, Sigurdson ER, Egleston BL, Starkey RB, Meropol NJ (2009) Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care. J Clin Oncol 27:4671–4678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Lei P, Wei B, Guo W, Wei H (2014) Minimally invasive surgical approach compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the feasibility and safety. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 24:296–305CrossRef Lei P, Wei B, Guo W, Wei H (2014) Minimally invasive surgical approach compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the feasibility and safety. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 24:296–305CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Correa-Gallego C, Dinkelspiel HE, Sulimanoff I, Fisher S, Vinuela EF, Kingham TP, et al. (2014) Minimally-invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg 218:129–139CrossRefPubMed Correa-Gallego C, Dinkelspiel HE, Sulimanoff I, Fisher S, Vinuela EF, Kingham TP, et al. (2014) Minimally-invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg 218:129–139CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy combined with a novel self-assessment system and feedback discussion: a phase 1 surgical trial following the IDEAL guidelines
verfasst von
Yosuke Inoue
Akio Saiura
Takafumi Sato
Takeaki Ishizawa
Junichi Arita
Yu Takahashi
Naoki Hiki
Takeshi Sano
Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Publikationsdatum
21.06.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1466-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.