Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2018

26.10.2017

Laparoscopic parenchymal sparing resections in segment 8: techniques for a demanding and infrequent procedure

verfasst von: David Martínez-Cecilia, Martina Fontana, Najaf N. Siddiqi, Mark Halls, Salvatore Barbaro, Mohammad Abu-Hilal

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic liver resections for lesions in the postero-superior segments are technically demanding due their deep location and relation with the vena cava. However, previous reports have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of these resections in centres with advanced experience in laparoscopic liver surgery. In this case series, we present our results and experience of laparoscopic parenchymal sparing liver resections of lesions in segment 8.

Methods

All patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resections of segment 8 lesions, alone or combined with other liver resections, between August 2003 and July 2016 were included. Analysis of baseline characteristics and perioperative results was performed for the whole cohort. A separate subgroup analysis was performed for isolated segment 8 resections. Long-term results were analyzed in patients with colorectal liver metastases. A video is attached for thorough explanation of surgical technique.

Results

A total of 30 patients were included. Among them, 13 patients had isolated segment 8 resections. Operative time for the whole cohort and isolated segment 8 resections were 210 min (range 180–247 min) and 200 min (range 90–300 min), respectively. The conversion rate was 3.4% for the entire cohort and 0 for isolated segment 8 resections. Major morbidity was 7 and 0%, respectively. R0 rates were 96% for the entire cohort and 92% for isolated segment 8 resections. Recurrence free survival in the colorectal liver metastasis subgroup was 82, 71 and 54% at 1, 3 and 5 years. Overall survival was 94, 82 and 65% at 1, 3 and 5 years.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic resection of lesions in segment 8 is feasible and offers the benefits of minimally invasive surgery with parenchyma sparing resections. However, advanced experience in LLR is essential to ensure safety and oncological results.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R, Malassagne B, Ste´phan F, Bensaid S, Rotman N, Fagniez PL (2000) Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 232:753–762CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R, Malassagne B, Ste´phan F, Bensaid S, Rotman N, Fagniez PL (2000) Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 232:753–762CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaneko H (2005) Laparoscopic hepatectomy: indications and outcomes. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:438–443CrossRefPubMed Kaneko H (2005) Laparoscopic hepatectomy: indications and outcomes. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:438–443CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Shin SH (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144:32–38CrossRefPubMed Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Shin SH (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144:32–38CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629PubMed Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Syed S, Primrose JN, Abu Hilal M (2011) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: a challenging, but feasible, safe and efficient procedure. Am J Surg 202:e52–e55CrossRefPubMed Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Syed S, Primrose JN, Abu Hilal M (2011) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: a challenging, but feasible, safe and efficient procedure. Am J Surg 202:e52–e55CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Lykoudis P, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2011) Single-centre comparative study of laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15:818–823CrossRefPubMed Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Lykoudis P, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2011) Single-centre comparative study of laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15:818–823CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Coles SR, Besselink MG, Serin KR, Alsaati H, Di Gioia P, Samim M, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2015) Total laparoscopic management of lesions involving liver segment 7. Surg Endosc 29(11):3190–3195CrossRefPubMed Coles SR, Besselink MG, Serin KR, Alsaati H, Di Gioia P, Samim M, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2015) Total laparoscopic management of lesions involving liver segment 7. Surg Endosc 29(11):3190–3195CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Abu Salameh M, Pearce NW (2012) Oncological efficiency analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for primary and metastatic cancer: a single-center UK experience. Arch Surg 147:42–48CrossRefPubMed Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Abu Salameh M, Pearce NW (2012) Oncological efficiency analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for primary and metastatic cancer: a single-center UK experience. Arch Surg 147:42–48CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Pearce NW (2008) Laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy: a safe, efficient, reproducible technique. Dig Surg 25:305–308CrossRefPubMed Abu Hilal M, Pearce NW (2008) Laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy: a safe, efficient, reproducible technique. Dig Surg 25:305–308CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Badran A, Di Fabio F, Pearce NW (2011) Pure laparoscopic en bloc left hemihepatectomy and caudate lobe resection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(9):845–849CrossRefPubMed Abu Hilal M, Badran A, Di Fabio F, Pearce NW (2011) Pure laparoscopic en bloc left hemihepatectomy and caudate lobe resection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(9):845–849CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotellar F, Pardo F, Bueno A, Martí-Cruchaga P, Zozaya G (2012) Extracorporeal tourniquet method for intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping during laparoscopic liver surgery: an easy, cheap and effective technique. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(3):481–485CrossRefPubMed Rotellar F, Pardo F, Bueno A, Martí-Cruchaga P, Zozaya G (2012) Extracorporeal tourniquet method for intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping during laparoscopic liver surgery: an easy, cheap and effective technique. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(3):481–485CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceño J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777CrossRefPubMed Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceño J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cipriani F, Rawashdeh M, Stanton L, Armstrong T, Takhar A, Pearce NW, Primrose J, Abu Hilal M (2016) Propensity score-based analysis of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 103:1504–1512CrossRefPubMed Cipriani F, Rawashdeh M, Stanton L, Armstrong T, Takhar A, Pearce NW, Primrose J, Abu Hilal M (2016) Propensity score-based analysis of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 103:1504–1512CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Takasaki J (1998) Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic resection: a new concept of liver segmentation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 5:286–291CrossRef Takasaki J (1998) Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic resection: a new concept of liver segmentation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 5:286–291CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat McPhail MJ1, Scibelli T, Abdelaziz M, Titi A, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2009) Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatectomy. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 3(4):345–351CrossRefPubMed McPhail MJ1, Scibelli T, Abdelaziz M, Titi A, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2009) Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatectomy. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 3(4):345–351CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M1, Di Fabio F, Syed S, Wiltshire R, Dimovska E, Turner D, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2013) Assessment of the financial implications for laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-centre UK cost analysis for minor and major hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 27(7):2542–2550CrossRefPubMed Abu Hilal M1, Di Fabio F, Syed S, Wiltshire R, Dimovska E, Turner D, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2013) Assessment of the financial implications for laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-centre UK cost analysis for minor and major hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 27(7):2542–2550CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cipriani F, Shelat VG, Rawashdeh M, Francone E, Aldrighetti L, Takhar A, Armstrong T, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2015) Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing resections for nonperipheral liver lesions, the diamond technique: technical aspects, clinical outcomes, and oncologic efficiency. J Am Coll Surg 221:265e 272CrossRef Cipriani F, Shelat VG, Rawashdeh M, Francone E, Aldrighetti L, Takhar A, Armstrong T, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2015) Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing resections for nonperipheral liver lesions, the diamond technique: technical aspects, clinical outcomes, and oncologic efficiency. J Am Coll Surg 221:265e 272CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogiso S, Conrad C, Araki K, Nomi T, Anil Z, Gayet B (2015) Laparoscopic transabdominal with transdiaphragmatic access improves resection of difficult posterosuperior liver lesions. Ann Surg 262(2):358–365CrossRefPubMed Ogiso S, Conrad C, Araki K, Nomi T, Anil Z, Gayet B (2015) Laparoscopic transabdominal with transdiaphragmatic access improves resection of difficult posterosuperior liver lesions. Ann Surg 262(2):358–365CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ichida H, Ishizawa T, Tanaka M, Terasawa M, Watanabe G, Takeda Y, Matsuki R, Matsumura M, Hata T, Mise Y, Inoue Y, Takahashi Y, Saiura A (2016) Use of intercostal trocars for laparoscopic resection of subphrenic hepatic tumors. Surg Endosc 21:1280–1286 Ichida H, Ishizawa T, Tanaka M, Terasawa M, Watanabe G, Takeda Y, Matsuki R, Matsumura M, Hata T, Mise Y, Inoue Y, Takahashi Y, Saiura A (2016) Use of intercostal trocars for laparoscopic resection of subphrenic hepatic tumors. Surg Endosc 21:1280–1286
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tranchart H, Gaillard M, Chirica M, Ferretti S, Perlemuter G, Naveau S, Dagher I (2015) Multivariate analysis of risk factors for postoperative complications after laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc 29:2538–2534CrossRefPubMed Tranchart H, Gaillard M, Chirica M, Ferretti S, Perlemuter G, Naveau S, Dagher I (2015) Multivariate analysis of risk factors for postoperative complications after laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc 29:2538–2534CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B (2015) laparoscopic major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in elderly patients: a single-center, case-matched study. Surg Endosc 29:1368–1375CrossRefPubMed Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B (2015) laparoscopic major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in elderly patients: a single-center, case-matched study. Surg Endosc 29:1368–1375CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Laurent A, Dagher I, Geller DA, Steel J, Thomas MT, Marvin M, Ravindra KV, Mejia A, Lainas P, Franco D, Cherqui D, Buell JF, Gamblin TC (2009) Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 250:842–848CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KT, Laurent A, Dagher I, Geller DA, Steel J, Thomas MT, Marvin M, Ravindra KV, Mejia A, Lainas P, Franco D, Cherqui D, Buell JF, Gamblin TC (2009) Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 250:842–848CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Santambrogio R, Opocher E, Ceretti AP, Barabino M, Costa M, Leone S, Montorsi M (2007) Impact of intraoperative ultrasonography in laparoscopic liver surgery. Surg Endosc 21:181–188CrossRefPubMed Santambrogio R, Opocher E, Ceretti AP, Barabino M, Costa M, Leone S, Montorsi M (2007) Impact of intraoperative ultrasonography in laparoscopic liver surgery. Surg Endosc 21:181–188CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Araki K (2014) Intraoperative ultrasonography of laparoscopic hepatectomy: key technique for safe liver transection. J Am Coll Surg 218:e37–e41CrossRefPubMed Araki K (2014) Intraoperative ultrasonography of laparoscopic hepatectomy: key technique for safe liver transection. J Am Coll Surg 218:e37–e41CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic parenchymal sparing resections in segment 8: techniques for a demanding and infrequent procedure
verfasst von
David Martínez-Cecilia
Martina Fontana
Najaf N. Siddiqi
Mark Halls
Salvatore Barbaro
Mohammad Abu-Hilal
Publikationsdatum
26.10.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5897-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.