Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

17.06.2022 | 2021 SAGES Oral

Laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair: a 16-year experience at a single institution

verfasst von: Alex Addo, Dylan Carmichael, Kelley Chan, Andrew Broda, Brian Dessify, Gabriel Mekel, Jon D. Gabrielsen, Anthony T. Petrick, David M. Parker

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHr) is a safe and effective procedure for relieving foregut symptoms associated with paraesophageal hernias (PEH). Nonetheless, it is estimated that about 30–50% of patients will have symptomatic recurrence requiring additional surgical intervention. Revision surgery is technically demanding and may be associated with a higher rate of morbidity and poor patient-reported outcomes. We present the largest study of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes among patients who underwent laparoscopic revision PEHr.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair between February 2003 and October 2019, at a single institution was conducted. All revisions of Type I hiatal hernias were excluded. The following validated surveys were used to evaluate quality-of-life outcomes: Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related QOL (GERD-HRQL). Patient demographic, perioperative, and quality-of-life (QOL) data were analyzed using univariate analysis.

Results

One hundred ninety patients were included in the final analysis (63.2% female, 90.5% single revision, 9.5% multiple revisions) with a mean age, BMI, and age-adjusted Charlson score of 56.6 ± 14.7 years, 29.7 ± 5.7 kg/m2, and 2.04 ± 1.9, respectively. The study cohort consisted of type II (49.5%), III (46.3%), and IV hiatal hernia (4.2%), respectively. Most patients underwent either a complete (68.7%) or partial (27.7%) fundoplication. A Collis gastroplasty was performed in 14.7% of patients. The median follow-up was 17.6 months. The overall morbidity and mortality rate were 15.8% and 1.1%, respectively. The 30-day readmission rate was 9.5%. Additionally, at latest follow-up 47.9% remained on antireflux medication. At latest follow-up, there was significant improvement in mean RSI score (46.4%, p < 0.001) from baseline within the study population. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in QOL between patients who had a history of an initial repair only or history of revision surgery at latest review. The overall recurrence rate was 16.3% with 6.3% requiring a surgical revision.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic revision PEHr is associated with a low rate of morbidity and mortality. Revision surgery may provide improvement in QOL outcomes, despite the high rate of long-term antireflux medication use. The rate of recurrent paraesophageal hernia remains low with few patients requiring a second revision. However, longer follow-up is needed to better characterize the long-term recurrence rate and symptomatic improvements.
Literatur
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kao AM, Otero J, Schlosser KA et al (2018) one more time: redo paraesophageal hernia repair results in safe, durable outcomes compared with primary repairs. Am Surg 84(7):1138–1145CrossRef Kao AM, Otero J, Schlosser KA et al (2018) one more time: redo paraesophageal hernia repair results in safe, durable outcomes compared with primary repairs. Am Surg 84(7):1138–1145CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Velanovich V, Karmy-Jones R (1998) Measuring gastroesophageal reflux disease: relationship between the Health-Related Quality of Life score and physiologic parameters. Am Surg 64(7):649–653 Velanovich V, Karmy-Jones R (1998) Measuring gastroesophageal reflux disease: relationship between the Health-Related Quality of Life score and physiologic parameters. Am Surg 64(7):649–653
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Christie C, Masoomi H, Matin T, Laugenour K, Hohmann S (2011) Utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open paraesophageal hernia repair. Am Surg 77(10):1353–1357CrossRef Nguyen NT, Christie C, Masoomi H, Matin T, Laugenour K, Hohmann S (2011) Utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open paraesophageal hernia repair. Am Surg 77(10):1353–1357CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair: a 16-year experience at a single institution
verfasst von
Alex Addo
Dylan Carmichael
Kelley Chan
Andrew Broda
Brian Dessify
Gabriel Mekel
Jon D. Gabrielsen
Anthony T. Petrick
David M. Parker
Publikationsdatum
17.06.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09359-8

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Verbände und Cremes gegen Dekubitus: „Wir wissen nicht, was sie bringen!“

Die Datenlage zur Wirksamkeit von Verbänden oder topischen Mitteln zur Prävention von Druckgeschwüren sei schlecht, so die Verfasser einer aktuellen Cochrane-Studie. Letztlich bleibe es unsicher, ob solche Maßnahmen den Betroffenen nutzen oder schaden.

Nackenschmerzen nach Bandscheibenvorfall: Muskeltraining hilft!

Bei hartnäckigen Schmerzen aufgrund einer zervikalen Radikulopathie schlägt ein Team der Universität Istanbul vor, lokale Steroidinjektionen mit einem speziellen Trainingsprogramm zur Stabilisierung der Nackenmuskulatur zu kombinieren.

US-Team empfiehlt Gastropexie nach Hiatushernien-Op.

Zur Vermeidung von Rezidiven nach Reparatur einer paraösophagealen Hiatushernie sollte einem US-Team zufolge der Magen bei der Op. routinemäßig an der Bauchwand fixiert werden. Das Ergebnis einer randomisierten Studie scheint dafür zu sprechen.

Mit Lidocain kommt der Darm nicht schneller in Schwung

Verzögertes Wiederanspringen der Darmfunktion ist ein Hauptfaktor dafür, wenn Patientinnen und Patienten nach einer Kolonresektion länger als geplant im Krankenhaus bleiben müssen. Ob man diesem Problem mit Lidocain vorbeugen kann, war Thema einer Studie.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.