Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2012

01.09.2012

Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection

verfasst von: S. Chalikonda, J. R. Aguilar-Saavedra, R. M. Walsh

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 9/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive procedures have expanded recently to include pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), but the efficacy of a laparoscopic robotic-assisted approach has not been demonstrated. A case-matched comparison was undertaken to study outcomes between laparoscopic robotic approach (LRPD) and the conventional open counterpart (OPD).

Methods

From March 2009 through December 2010, 30 LRPD were performed by two pancreaticobiliary surgeons at the Cleveland Clinic. Thirty OPD patients operated by four pancreaticobiliary surgeons during this same period were matched by demographics, and postoperative outcomes were compared from review of a prospectively collected database.

Results

Mean age was 62 years for LRPD versus 61 years for OPD (p = 0.43). Mean body mass index was 24.8 versus 25.6 kg/m2 (p = 0.49). Surgical indications included adenocarcinoma in 14 patients from each group (46%), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in 4 (14%), and other in 12 (40%). There was one preoperative death in the LRPD group and none following OPD. Morbidity occurred in nine patients (30%) following LRPD versus 13 (44%) in the OPD group (p = 0.14). Intraoperative factors assessed included blood loss (485.8 vs 775 ml, p = 0.13) and operative time (476.2 vs 366.4 min, p = 0.0005). Conversion from LRPD to open occurred in three patients (12%) due to bleeding. Reoperation was performed in two patients (6%) following LRPD versus seven (24%) following OPD (p = 0.17). Length of hospital stay was 9.79 days for LRPD versus 13.26 days in the OPD group (p = 0.043).

Conclusions

This is the first comparison of a novel laparoscopic robotic-assisted PD with the open PD in a case-matched fashion. Our data demonstrate a significant increase in operative time but decreased length of stay for LRPD. The favorable morbidity following LRPD makes it a reasonable surgical approach for selected patients requiring PD.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR (1935) Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 102(4):763–779PubMedCrossRef Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR (1935) Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 102(4):763–779PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ et al (1993) One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 217(5):430–435 discussion 435–8PubMedCrossRef Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ et al (1993) One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 217(5):430–435 discussion 435–8PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10(9):1199–1210 discussion 1210–1211PubMedCrossRef Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10(9):1199–1210 discussion 1210–1211PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF et al (2007) Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg 246(2):246–253PubMedCrossRef McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF et al (2007) Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg 246(2):246–253PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Orr RK (2010) Outcomes in pancreatic cancer surgery. Surg Clin North Am 90(2):219–34 Orr RK (2010) Outcomes in pancreatic cancer surgery. Surg Clin North Am 90(2):219–34
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ (2002) Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Adv Surg 36:15–38PubMed Yeo CJ (2002) Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Adv Surg 36:15–38PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho A, Yamamoto H, Nagata M et al (2009) Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease. Am J Surg 198(3):445–449PubMedCrossRef Cho A, Yamamoto H, Nagata M et al (2009) Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease. Am J Surg 198(3):445–449PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410PubMedCrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Milone L, Turner P, Gagner M (2004) Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic tumors, an uptake. Minerva Chir 59(2):165–173PubMed Milone L, Turner P, Gagner M (2004) Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic tumors, an uptake. Minerva Chir 59(2):165–173PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Ellison EC (2003) Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13(1):33–36PubMedCrossRef Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Ellison EC (2003) Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13(1):33–36PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784PubMedCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasilescu C, Sgarbura O, Tudor S et al (2009) Robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. A case report. Acta Chir Belg 109(3):396–399PubMed Vasilescu C, Sgarbura O, Tudor S et al (2009) Robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. A case report. Acta Chir Belg 109(3):396–399PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Initial experiences using robot-assisted central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy: a potential way to advanced laparoscopic pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 25(4):1101s–1106s Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Initial experiences using robot-assisted central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy: a potential way to advanced laparoscopic pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 25(4):1101s–1106s
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al. (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic middle pancreatectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(2):135–139 Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al. (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic middle pancreatectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(2):135–139
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al. (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24(7):1646–1657 Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al. (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24(7):1646–1657
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg Endosc 25(6):2004–2009 Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg Endosc 25(6):2004–2009
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA et al. (2010) Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery 148(4):814–823 Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA et al. (2010) Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery 148(4):814–823
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Strasberg SM (2009) Severity grading of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250(2):197–198PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, Strasberg SM (2009) Severity grading of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250(2):197–198PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Pomp A, Herrera MF (1996) Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 120(6):1051–1054PubMedCrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A, Herrera MF (1996) Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 120(6):1051–1054PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145(1):19–23 Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145(1):19–23
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Nelson H et al (2008) Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States. Arch Surg 143(9):832–839 discussion 839–840PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Nelson H et al (2008) Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States. Arch Surg 143(9):832–839 discussion 839–840PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Saif MW (2011) Adjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer: beyond gemcitabine. Highlights from the “2011 ASCO gastrointestinal cancers symposium”. San Francisco, CA, USA. (January 20–22). JOP 12(2):106–9 Saif MW (2011) Adjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer: beyond gemcitabine. Highlights from the “2011 ASCO gastrointestinal cancers symposium”. San Francisco, CA, USA. (January 20–22). JOP 12(2):106–9
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection
verfasst von
S. Chalikonda
J. R. Aguilar-Saavedra
R. M. Walsh
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2207-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.