Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4/2017

12.11.2016 | Original Article

Laparoscopic surgery should be considered in T4 colon cancer

verfasst von: Dedrick Kok Hong Chan, Ker-Kan Tan

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopy in T4 colon cancers is not widely advocated due to concerns regarding safety and oncologic efficacy. We conducted this study to compare the short- and long-term oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open approaches in T4 colon cancers.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent surgery for T4 colon cancer from 2008 to 2014 was performed. Margin positive rate, lymph node yield, local or distant recurrence and overall survival were analysed.

Results

A total of 59 patients received open surgery, whilst 93 underwent laparoscopic surgery, with a conversion rate of 8.6%.
There was no difference in the various measured outcomes between the laparoscopic and open groups. The relative risks of positive margins and inadequate lymph node yield for staging were 0.95 (0.74–1.23, p = 0.692) and 1.01 (0.97–1.05, p = 0.710), respectively, for the laparoscopic group when compared to the open approach.
Regarding long-term outcomes, the relative risk of local recurrence in the laparoscopic group was 0.99 (0.96–1.02, p = 0.477), whilst there were also no increased risks of developing distal recurrences at the liver (RR 1.19, 0.51–2.82, p = 0.684), lungs (RR 1.20, 0.50–2.87, p = 0.678) and peritoneum (RR 1.22, 0.51–2.95, p = 0.653) in the laparoscopic group.
There was also no difference in the overall survival (RR 0.70, 0.42–1.16, p = 0.168). Patients were followed up for a median of 73.3 months (range 34.8–144.7).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery does not compromise oncological outcomes in T4 colon cancers compared to the open approach. Because of its proven associated benefits, laparoscopy should be considered in selected T4 colon cancers.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan DK, Chong CS, Lieske B, Tan KK (2014) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: what is the evidence? Biomed Res Int 2014:347810PubMedPubMedCentral Chan DK, Chong CS, Lieske B, Tan KK (2014) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: what is the evidence? Biomed Res Int 2014:347810PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Elnahas A, Sunil S, Jackson TD, Okrainec A, Quereshy FA (2016) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 colon cancer: evaluation of margin status. Surg Endosc 30(4):1491–1496CrossRefPubMed Elnahas A, Sunil S, Jackson TD, Okrainec A, Quereshy FA (2016) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 colon cancer: evaluation of margin status. Surg Endosc 30(4):1491–1496CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Shukla PJ, Trencheva K, Merchant C, Maggiori L, Michelassi F, Sonoda T, Lee SW, Milsom JW (2015) Laparoscopic resection of T4 colon cancers: is it feasible? Dis Colon rectum 58(1):25–31 Shukla PJ, Trencheva K, Merchant C, Maggiori L, Michelassi F, Sonoda T, Lee SW, Milsom JW (2015) Laparoscopic resection of T4 colon cancers: is it feasible? Dis Colon rectum 58(1):25–31
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, Meijer DW, Buunen M, Jeekel J, Anderberg B, Cuesta MA, Cuschierl A, Fingerhut A, Fleshman JW, Guillou PJ, Haglind E, Himpens J, Jacobi CA, Jakimowicz JJ, Koeckerling F, Lacy AM, Lezoche E, Monson JR, Morino M, Neugebauer E, Wexner SD, Whelan RL, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18(8):1163–1185CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, Meijer DW, Buunen M, Jeekel J, Anderberg B, Cuesta MA, Cuschierl A, Fingerhut A, Fleshman JW, Guillou PJ, Haglind E, Himpens J, Jacobi CA, Jakimowicz JJ, Koeckerling F, Lacy AM, Lezoche E, Monson JR, Morino M, Neugebauer E, Wexner SD, Whelan RL, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18(8):1163–1185CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat American Gastroenterology Association (2014) AGA institute guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: clinical decision tool. Gastroenterology 146(5):1413–1414CrossRef American Gastroenterology Association (2014) AGA institute guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: clinical decision tool. Gastroenterology 146(5):1413–1414CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bretagnol F, Dedieu A, Zappa M, Guedj N, Ferron M, Panis Y (2011) T4 colorectal cancer: is laparoscopic resection contraindicated? Color Dis 13(2):138–143CrossRef Bretagnol F, Dedieu A, Zappa M, Guedj N, Ferron M, Panis Y (2011) T4 colorectal cancer: is laparoscopic resection contraindicated? Color Dis 13(2):138–143CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F, Sugihara K, Watanabe M, Moriya Y, Kitano S, Japan Clinical Oncology Group Colorectal Cancer Study Group (2014) Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg 260(1):23–30CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F, Sugihara K, Watanabe M, Moriya Y, Kitano S, Japan Clinical Oncology Group Colorectal Cancer Study Group (2014) Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg 260(1):23–30CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vignali A, Ghirardelli L, Di Palo S, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2013) Laparoscopic treatment of advanced colonic cancer: a case-matched control with open surgery. Color Dis 15(8):944–948CrossRef Vignali A, Ghirardelli L, Di Palo S, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2013) Laparoscopic treatment of advanced colonic cancer: a case-matched control with open surgery. Color Dis 15(8):944–948CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bretagnol F, Leroy J (2016) Laparoscopic resection for T4 colon cancer: perioperative and long-term outcomes. Updat Surg Bretagnol F, Leroy J (2016) Laparoscopic resection for T4 colon cancer: perioperative and long-term outcomes. Updat Surg
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic surgery should be considered in T4 colon cancer
verfasst von
Dedrick Kok Hong Chan
Ker-Kan Tan
Publikationsdatum
12.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2702-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.