Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2017

08.09.2016

Laparoscopic wedge resection for suspected large (≥5 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

verfasst von: Chun Yuet Khoo, Brian K. P. Goh, Alvin K. H. Eng, Weng-Hoong Chan, Melissa C. C. Teo, Alexander Y. F. Chung, Hock-Soo Ong, Wai-Keong Wong

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is now widely accepted, but its application for large GISTs remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LWR for suspected large (≥5 cm) gastric GISTs.

Methods

Retrospective review of 82 consecutive patients who underwent attempted LWR for suspected gastric GIST. LWR for large (≥5 cm) (n = 23) tumors was compared with LWR for small (<5 cm) tumors (n = 59). The 23 patients with LWR for large tumors were also compared to 36 consecutive patients who underwent open wedge resection (OWR) for large tumors.

Results

Comparison between patients who underwent LWR for large versus small tumors demonstrated that resection of large tumors was associated with a longer operating time. There was no difference in other perioperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes such as frequency of close margins (≤1 mm) and recurrence-free survival. Comparison between patients who underwent LWR versus OWR for large tumors showed that LWR was associated with decreased median time to fluid or solid diet, shorter postoperative stay but longer operating times. There was no difference in oncological outcomes.

Conclusion

LWR for suspected large gastric GIST is feasible and safe. It is associated with similar short-term outcomes with LWR for small tumors and favorable short-term outcomes over OWR for large tumors without compromising on oncological outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Connolly EM, Gaffney E, Reynolds JV (2003) Gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Surg 90:1178–1186CrossRefPubMed Connolly EM, Gaffney E, Reynolds JV (2003) Gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Surg 90:1178–1186CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh BK, Chow PK, Yap WM et al (2008) Which Is the optimal risk stratification system for surgically treated localized primary gist? comparison of three contemporary prognostic criteria in 171 tumors and a proposal for a modified armed forces institute of pathology risk criteria. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2153–2163CrossRefPubMed Goh BK, Chow PK, Yap WM et al (2008) Which Is the optimal risk stratification system for surgically treated localized primary gist? comparison of three contemporary prognostic criteria in 171 tumors and a proposal for a modified armed forces institute of pathology risk criteria. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2153–2163CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh BK, Chow PK, Kesavan SM et al (2010) Outcome after curative resection of large (≥10 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: how frequent is adjacent organ involvement and is concomitant distal pancreatectomy necessary? J Gastrointest Surg 14:607–613CrossRefPubMed Goh BK, Chow PK, Kesavan SM et al (2010) Outcome after curative resection of large (≥10 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: how frequent is adjacent organ involvement and is concomitant distal pancreatectomy necessary? J Gastrointest Surg 14:607–613CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chok AY, Goh BK, Koh YX et al (2015) Validation of the MSKCC gastrointestinal stromal tumor nomogram and comparison with other prognostication systems: single-institution experience with 289 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3597–3605CrossRefPubMed Chok AY, Goh BK, Koh YX et al (2015) Validation of the MSKCC gastrointestinal stromal tumor nomogram and comparison with other prognostication systems: single-institution experience with 289 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3597–3605CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh BK, Goh YC, Eng AK et al (2015) Outcome after laparoscopic versus open wedge resection for suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a matched-pair case–control study. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:905–910CrossRefPubMed Goh BK, Goh YC, Eng AK et al (2015) Outcome after laparoscopic versus open wedge resection for suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a matched-pair case–control study. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:905–910CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh BK, Chow PK, Chok AY et al (2010) Impact of the introduction of laparoscopic wedge resection as a surgical option for suspected small/medium-sized gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach on perioperative and oncologic outcomes. World J Surg 34:1847–1852CrossRefPubMed Goh BK, Chow PK, Chok AY et al (2010) Impact of the introduction of laparoscopic wedge resection as a surgical option for suspected small/medium-sized gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach on perioperative and oncologic outcomes. World J Surg 34:1847–1852CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi SM, Kim MC, Jung GJ et al (2007) Laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric GIST: long-term follow-up results. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:444–447CrossRefPubMed Choi SM, Kim MC, Jung GJ et al (2007) Laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric GIST: long-term follow-up results. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:444–447CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Karakousis GC, Singer S, Zheng J et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a size-matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1599–1605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Karakousis GC, Singer S, Zheng J et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a size-matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1599–1605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang JW, Zheng ZC, Zhang JJ et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:378–387CrossRefPubMed Liang JW, Zheng ZC, Zhang JJ et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:378–387CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Koh YX, Chok AY, Zheng HL et al (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3549–3560CrossRefPubMed Koh YX, Chok AY, Zheng HL et al (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3549–3560CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen K, Zhou YC, Mou YP et al (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Surg Endosc 29:355–367CrossRefPubMed Chen K, Zhou YC, Mou YP et al (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Surg Endosc 29:355–367CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen QL, Pan Y, Cai JQ et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Onc 12:206CrossRef Chen QL, Pan Y, Cai JQ et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Onc 12:206CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR et al (2010) NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8(Suppl 2):S1–S41 quiz S42-S44 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR et al (2010) NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8(Suppl 2):S1–S41 quiz S42-S44 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (2014) ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 25(Suppl 3):21–26CrossRef ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (2014) ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 25(Suppl 3):21–26CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Piessen G, Lefèvre JH, Cabau M et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Surg 262:831–840CrossRefPubMed Piessen G, Lefèvre JH, Cabau M et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Surg 262:831–840CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsiao CY, Yang CY, Lai IR et al (2014) Laparoscopic resection for large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): intermediate follow-up results. Surg Endosc 29:868–873CrossRefPubMed Hsiao CY, Yang CY, Lai IR et al (2014) Laparoscopic resection for large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): intermediate follow-up results. Surg Endosc 29:868–873CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin J, Huang C, Zheng C et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open gastric resection for larger than 5 cm primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a size-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 28:2577–2583CrossRefPubMed Lin J, Huang C, Zheng C et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open gastric resection for larger than 5 cm primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a size-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 28:2577–2583CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim KH, Kim MC, Jung GJ et al (2012) Long term survival results for gastric GIST: is laparoscopic surgery for large gastric GIST feasible? World J Surg Oncol 10:230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim KH, Kim MC, Jung GJ et al (2012) Long term survival results for gastric GIST: is laparoscopic surgery for large gastric GIST feasible? World J Surg Oncol 10:230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Sing RF et al (2006) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Surg 243:738–747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Sing RF et al (2006) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Surg 243:738–747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Masoni L, Gentili I, Maglio R et al (2014) Laparoscopic resection of large gastric GISTs: feasibility and long-term results. Surg Endosc 28:2905–2910CrossRefPubMed Masoni L, Gentili I, Maglio R et al (2014) Laparoscopic resection of large gastric GISTs: feasibility and long-term results. Surg Endosc 28:2905–2910CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogelaere KD, Loo IV, Peters O et al (2012) Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is safe and effective, irrespective of tumor size. Surg Endosc 26:2339–2345CrossRefPubMed Vogelaere KD, Loo IV, Peters O et al (2012) Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is safe and effective, irrespective of tumor size. Surg Endosc 26:2339–2345CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasetsermwiriya W, Nagai E, Nakata K et al (2014) Laparoscopic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor is feasible irrespective of tumor size. J Laparoendosc Adv S24:123–129CrossRef Kasetsermwiriya W, Nagai E, Nakata K et al (2014) Laparoscopic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor is feasible irrespective of tumor size. J Laparoendosc Adv S24:123–129CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic wedge resection for suspected large (≥5 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
verfasst von
Chun Yuet Khoo
Brian K. P. Goh
Alvin K. H. Eng
Weng-Hoong Chan
Melissa C. C. Teo
Alexander Y. F. Chung
Hock-Soo Ong
Wai-Keong Wong
Publikationsdatum
08.09.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5229-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.