Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2008

01.07.2008

Laparoscopically assisted colectomy: a study of risk factors and predictors of open conversion

verfasst von: P. Y. Tan, J. H. Stephens, N. A. Rieger, P. J. Hewett

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Conversion to an open procedure during laparoscopically assisted colorectal resection may be necessary because of technical, patient, or pathologic factors. Recent literature has indicated that converted patients may have poorer outcomes than those undergoing open or completed laparoscopically assisted procedure. This study aimed to audit the authors’ experience with laparoscopically assisted colectomy and to assess the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing conversion.

Methods

All laparoscopic right hemicolectomies or anterior resections performed at seven South Australian hospitals from 1997 to 2006 were reviewed. Data pertaining to patient sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, pathology, operative outcomes including operating time, conversion, reason for conversion, length of hospital stay, and intra- and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

Laparoscopic anterior resection had a higher rate of open conversion than laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (18.7% vs 10.4%; p = 0.028). In the right hemicolectomy group, none of the investigated risk factors for conversion were statistically significant, and the morbidity rates for the two groups were similar. The median hospital stay was significantly longer in the anterior resection group (p < 0.001), and the wound morbidity rate was higher in the converted group (12.8% vs 3.0%; p = 0.022). Age older than 75 years and a high ASA status were independent risk factors for conversion in anterior resection.

Conclusions

Conversion of laparoscopic anterior resection to open procedure is associated with higher wound morbidity and a longer hospital stay. The authors recommend that surgeons carefully consider the selection of patients 75 years of age or older and high ASA status for laparoscopic anterior resection.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber C, Sargent D, Schroeder G, the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomised trial. JAMA 287:321–328PubMedCrossRef Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber C, Sargent D, Schroeder G, the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomised trial. JAMA 287:321–328PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Velanovich V (2000) Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. Surg Endosc 14:16–21PubMedCrossRef Velanovich V (2000) Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. Surg Endosc 14:16–21PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung CC, Tsang WW, Kwok SY, Li MK (2003) Laparoscopy and its current role in the management of colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis 5:528–543PubMedCrossRef Chung CC, Tsang WW, Kwok SY, Li MK (2003) Laparoscopy and its current role in the management of colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis 5:528–543PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350:2050–2062CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350:2050–2062CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, the MRC CLASICC trial group. (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1727PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, the MRC CLASICC trial group. (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1727PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, Scheuerlein H, Barlehner E, Konradt J, Wittekind C, Kockerling F, the Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (2003) Oncological quality and preliminary long-term results in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 17:903–910PubMedCrossRef Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, Scheuerlein H, Barlehner E, Konradt J, Wittekind C, Kockerling F, the Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (2003) Oncological quality and preliminary long-term results in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 17:903–910PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Franks PJ, Bosanquet N, Thorpe H, Brown JM, Copeland J, Smith AMH, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2006) Short-term costs of conventional vs laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial). Br J Cancer 95:6–12PubMedCrossRef Franks PJ, Bosanquet N, Thorpe H, Brown JM, Copeland J, Smith AMH, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2006) Short-term costs of conventional vs laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial). Br J Cancer 95:6–12PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Janson M, Bjorholt I, Carlsson P, Haglind E, Henriksson M, Lindholm E, Anderberg B (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the cost of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg 91:409–417PubMedCrossRef Janson M, Bjorholt I, Carlsson P, Haglind E, Henriksson M, Lindholm E, Anderberg B (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the cost of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg 91:409–417PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91PubMedCrossRef Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Kohler L, Barlehner E, Kockerling F, the Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15:116–120PubMedCrossRef Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Kohler L, Barlehner E, Kockerling F, the Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15:116–120PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah PR, Joseph A, Haray PN (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: learning curve and training implications. Postgrad Med J 81:537–540PubMedCrossRef Shah PR, Joseph A, Haray PN (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: learning curve and training implications. Postgrad Med J 81:537–540PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243PubMedCrossRef Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pandya S, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Rusin LC (1999) Laparoscopic colectomy: indications for conversion to laparotomy. Arch Surg 134:471–475PubMedCrossRef Pandya S, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Rusin LC (1999) Laparoscopic colectomy: indications for conversion to laparotomy. Arch Surg 134:471–475PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, Yildirim C, Lippert H, Kockerling F (2005) Laparoscopic surgery in the old patient: do indications and outcome differ? Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:328–332PubMedCrossRef Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, Yildirim C, Lippert H, Kockerling F (2005) Laparoscopic surgery in the old patient: do indications and outcome differ? Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:328–332PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929PubMedCrossRef Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Simons AJ, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Franklin M, Fleshman J, Geis WP, Beart RW (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy learning curve. Dis Colon Rectum 38:600–603PubMedCrossRef Simons AJ, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Franklin M, Fleshman J, Geis WP, Beart RW (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy learning curve. Dis Colon Rectum 38:600–603PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1378PubMedCrossRef Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1378PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopically assisted colectomy: a study of risk factors and predictors of open conversion
verfasst von
P. Y. Tan
J. H. Stephens
N. A. Rieger
P. J. Hewett
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9702-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2008 Zur Ausgabe

SAGES 2007 Rural Surgery Panel

Rural surgery and surgical education

SAGES 2007 Rural Surgery Panel

SAGES 2007 rural surgery panel

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.