Laryngeal Dysplasia: Persisting Dilemmas, Disagreements and Unsolved Problems—A Short Review

We present the historical review and current state of the histopathological classifications and terminology of laryngeal precursor lesions. Attention to recent genetic findings is also presented; although in need of additional confirmation, these raise possibility for early detection of patients at risk of dysplasia progression. Although a number of identified genetic alterations with a promising diagnostic and prognostic value are emerging, none of the known genetic alterations can be currently implemented in clinical practice as a completely reliable diagnostic and/or prognostic marker. Regarding the terminology of precursor lesions, dysplasia remains the most frequently used term, but squamous intraepithelial lesion can be used as a synonym as well. Histological findings, in spite of certain degree of subjectivity, remain at present the most reliable method for an accurate diagnosis. The current 2017 WHO classification seems to successfully stratify risk of malignant progression, with a significantly different risk of malignant progression between low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia. In case of pronounced architectural disorders, severe cellular and nuclear atypias, and an increased number of mitoses, also atypical form, the high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma in situ can be separated. The Slovenian tertiary centers have a policy of surgical removal of high-grade SILs and life-long close follow-up. Radiotherapy is reserved for more pronounced intraepithelial lesions classified as carcinoma in situ and invasive cancer. Such a distinction can facilitate clinical decision to use radiotherapy if complete surgical removal is not possible.