Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 2/2020

08.05.2019 | Original Article

LeFort colpocleisis for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse

verfasst von: Xiaojuan Wang, Changdong Hu, Yisong Chen, Keqin Hua

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The causes of recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are sufficiently understood. However, few studies are available evaluating reoperation for recurrence of POP. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of LeFort colpocleisis for recurrent POP.

Methods

We reviewed data from patients with recurrent POP who underwent LerFort colpocleisis at a center between March 2012 and April 2017. Quality of life was assessed using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire (PFDI-20) scores. The Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I) was used to assess self-perceived success and subjective measures of satisfaction. The Clavien-Dindo classification (CD) was used to assess the safety of the procedure. Chi-square and paired t-tests were used to compare the same patients before and after treatment in the follow-up.

Results

Twenty-six patients with recurrent POP after previous prolapse surgery underwent LeFort colpocleisis. Most of these patients had at least one comorbidity. The mean age (years) was 71.8 (7.3). The mean time to recurrent POP was 5.602 (3.643) years. There were no intraoperative bladder lesions or rectal lesions. At mean follow-up of 33.1 months, all patients had no recurrence (< stage 2), significant resolution of awareness of prolapse (P < 0.05), and significantly improved satisfaction on PGI-I after surgery. Minor complications were classified as CD II level in four cases (15.4%).

Conclusion

This study suggests that LeFort colpocleisis is feasible and safe for recurrent POP, especially in older women with comorbidities.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkins MF, Wu JM. Lifetime risk of surgery for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Minerva Ginecol. 2017;69(2):171–7.PubMed Wilkins MF, Wu JM. Lifetime risk of surgery for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Minerva Ginecol. 2017;69(2):171–7.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dallas KB, Rogo-Gupta L, Elliott CS. What impacts the all cause risk of reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse repair? A comparison of mesh and native tissue approaches in 110,329 women. J Urol. 2018;3(18):42415–9. Dallas KB, Rogo-Gupta L, Elliott CS. What impacts the all cause risk of reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse repair? A comparison of mesh and native tissue approaches in 110,329 women. J Urol. 2018;3(18):42415–9.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonsson Funk M, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Pate V, Wu JM. Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(8):1279–85.CrossRef Jonsson Funk M, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Pate V, Wu JM. Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(8):1279–85.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Manodoro S, Frigerio M, Cola A, Spelzini F, Milani R. Risk factors for recurrence after hysterectomy plus native-tissue repair as primary treatment for genital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;29(4):1–7. Manodoro S, Frigerio M, Cola A, Spelzini F, Milani R. Risk factors for recurrence after hysterectomy plus native-tissue repair as primary treatment for genital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;29(4):1–7.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lavelle ES, Giugale LE, Winger DG, Li W, CarterBrooks CM, Shepherd JP. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018. Lavelle ES, Giugale LE, Winger DG, Li W, CarterBrooks CM, Shepherd JP. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Lee J, Swift SE, Cosson M, Deprest J, et al. International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related to native tissue female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31(4):406–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22199.CrossRefPubMed Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Lee J, Swift SE, Cosson M, Deprest J, et al. International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related to native tissue female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31(4):406–14. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​nau.​22199.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbasy S, Kenton K. Obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53(1):86–98.CrossRef Abbasy S, Kenton K. Obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53(1):86–98.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Guerette NL, Bena JF, Davila GW. Transobturator slings for stress incontinence: using urodynamic parameters to predict outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(1):97–102.CrossRef Guerette NL, Bena JF, Davila GW. Transobturator slings for stress incontinence: using urodynamic parameters to predict outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(1):97–102.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2005;193(1):103.CrossRef Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2005;193(1):103.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):523–8.CrossRef Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):523–8.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mothes AR, Mothes HK, Radosa MP, Runnebaum IB. Systematic assessment of surgical complications in 438 cases of vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse adopting Clavien-Dindo classification. Arch Gynecol Obstetr. 2014;291(6):1–5. Mothes AR, Mothes HK, Radosa MP, Runnebaum IB. Systematic assessment of surgical complications in 438 cases of vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse adopting Clavien-Dindo classification. Arch Gynecol Obstetr. 2014;291(6):1–5.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mettu JR, Colaco M, Badlani GH. Evidence-based outcomes for mesh-based surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24(4):370–4.CrossRef Mettu JR, Colaco M, Badlani GH. Evidence-based outcomes for mesh-based surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24(4):370–4.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dallas KB, Rogo-Gupta L, Elliott CS. What impacts the all cause risk of reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse repair? A comparison of mesh and native tissue approaches in 110,329 women. J Urol. 2018. Dallas KB, Rogo-Gupta L, Elliott CS. What impacts the all cause risk of reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse repair? A comparison of mesh and native tissue approaches in 110,329 women. J Urol. 2018.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang X, Chen Y, Hua K. Pelvic symptoms, body image, and regret after LeFort colpocleisis: a long-term follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(3):415–9.CrossRef Wang X, Chen Y, Hua K. Pelvic symptoms, body image, and regret after LeFort colpocleisis: a long-term follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(3):415–9.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ismail S, Duckett J, Rizk D, Sorinola O, Kammererdoak D, Contrerasortiz O, et al. Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(11):1–14.CrossRef Ismail S, Duckett J, Rizk D, Sorinola O, Kammererdoak D, Contrerasortiz O, et al. Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(11):1–14.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Haya N, Maher M, Ballard EJIUJ. Surgical management of recurrent upper vaginal prolapse following sacral colpopexy. 2015; 26 (8):1243–1245. Haya N, Maher M, Ballard EJIUJ. Surgical management of recurrent upper vaginal prolapse following sacral colpopexy. 2015; 26 (8):1243–1245.
Metadaten
Titel
LeFort colpocleisis for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse
verfasst von
Xiaojuan Wang
Changdong Hu
Yisong Chen
Keqin Hua
Publikationsdatum
08.05.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03969-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.