Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2011

01.10.2011 | Original Article

Lessons from a patient experience survey in a randomized surgical trial of treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women

verfasst von: Philippe E. Zimmern, Kimberly J. Dandreo, Larry Sirls, Alice Howell, Lynn Hall, Judy Gruss, Kathy Jesse, Tamara Dickinson, Caren Prather

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 10/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To understand the patient burden of study procedures/measures at completion of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) requiring extensive testing and follow-up visits.

Methods

A survey sent after completing the 2-year visit of an RCT comparing Burch colposuspension and fascial retropubic sling to treat stress urinary incontinence assessed degree of bother for seven study procedures, eight study-related factors, and possible motivations to participate in the study.

Results

A total of 450 study participants (88%) returned the survey. Urodynamic testing was the most bothersome procedure, followed by 24-h pad test and Q-tip test. Self-administered questionnaires were the least bothersome. Main reasons to participate in the study were to help others, obtain better knowledge about the condition, and be guided by a committed team of investigators/study coordinators.

Conclusions

At the end of a large multicenter RCT, we learned from a confidential patient survey that the most burdensome activities involved invasive procedures, frequent visits, and multiple forms to fill out.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Steers W, Richter H, Nyberg L, Kusek J, Kraus S, Dandreo K et al (2009) Challenges of conducting multi-center, multi-disciplinary urinary incontinence clinical trials: experience of the urinary incontinence treatment network. Neurourol Urodyn 28(3):170–176PubMedCrossRef Steers W, Richter H, Nyberg L, Kusek J, Kraus S, Dandreo K et al (2009) Challenges of conducting multi-center, multi-disciplinary urinary incontinence clinical trials: experience of the urinary incontinence treatment network. Neurourol Urodyn 28(3):170–176PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tennstedt S (2005) Design of the Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy Trial (SISTEr). Urology 66(6):1213–1217PubMedCrossRef Tennstedt S (2005) Design of the Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy Trial (SISTEr). Urology 66(6):1213–1217PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, Norton P, Kraus SR, Zimmern PE et al (2007) Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 356(21):2143–2155PubMedCrossRef Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, Norton P, Kraus SR, Zimmern PE et al (2007) Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 356(21):2143–2155PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerrison S, Laws S, Cane M, Thompson A (2008) The patient’s experience of being a human subject. J R Soc Med 101(8):416–422PubMedCrossRef Kerrison S, Laws S, Cane M, Thompson A (2008) The patient’s experience of being a human subject. J R Soc Med 101(8):416–422PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Canvin K, Jacoby A (2006) Duty, desire or indifference? A qualitative study of patient decisions about recruitment to an epilepsy treatment trial. Trials 7:32PubMedCrossRef Canvin K, Jacoby A (2006) Duty, desire or indifference? A qualitative study of patient decisions about recruitment to an epilepsy treatment trial. Trials 7:32PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Henzlova MJ, Blackburn GH, Bradley EJ, Rogers WJ (1994) Patient perception of a long-term clinical trial: experience using a close-out questionnaire in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Trial. SOLVD Close-out Working Group. Control Clin Trials 15(4):284–293PubMedCrossRef Henzlova MJ, Blackburn GH, Bradley EJ, Rogers WJ (1994) Patient perception of a long-term clinical trial: experience using a close-out questionnaire in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Trial. SOLVD Close-out Working Group. Control Clin Trials 15(4):284–293PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Anger JT, Saigal CS, Wang M, Yano EM (2008) Urologic disease burden in the United States: veteran users of Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare. Urology 72(1):37–41, discussionPubMedCrossRef Anger JT, Saigal CS, Wang M, Yano EM (2008) Urologic disease burden in the United States: veteran users of Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare. Urology 72(1):37–41, discussionPubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fultz NH, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Kinchen KS, Obenchain R, Bump RC (2003) Burden of stress urinary incontinence for community-dwelling women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(5):1275–1282PubMedCrossRef Fultz NH, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Kinchen KS, Obenchain R, Bump RC (2003) Burden of stress urinary incontinence for community-dwelling women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(5):1275–1282PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hampel C, Artibani W, Espuna Pons M, Haab F, Jackson S, Romero J et al (2004) Understanding the burden of stress urinary incontinence in Europe: a qualitative review of the literature. Eur Urol 46(1):15–27PubMedCrossRef Hampel C, Artibani W, Espuna Pons M, Haab F, Jackson S, Romero J et al (2004) Understanding the burden of stress urinary incontinence in Europe: a qualitative review of the literature. Eur Urol 46(1):15–27PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Majumdar A, Latthe P, Toozs-Hobson P (2010) Urodynamics prior to treatment as an intervention: a pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn 29(4):522–526PubMed Majumdar A, Latthe P, Toozs-Hobson P (2010) Urodynamics prior to treatment as an intervention: a pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn 29(4):522–526PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh M, Bushman W, Clemens JQ (2007) Do pad tests and voiding diaries affect patient willingness to participate in studies of incontinence treatment outcomes? J Urol 171(1):316–318, discussion 8−9CrossRef Singh M, Bushman W, Clemens JQ (2007) Do pad tests and voiding diaries affect patient willingness to participate in studies of incontinence treatment outcomes? J Urol 171(1):316–318, discussion 8−9CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Lessons from a patient experience survey in a randomized surgical trial of treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women
verfasst von
Philippe E. Zimmern
Kimberly J. Dandreo
Larry Sirls
Alice Howell
Lynn Hall
Judy Gruss
Kathy Jesse
Tamara Dickinson
Caren Prather
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1507-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2011

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.