nach oben

Intensive Care Medicine

Erschienen in:

09.08.2019 | What’s new in ICM

Liberal versus restrictive fluid therapy in critically ill patients

verfasst von: Jonathan A. Silversides, Anders Perner, Manu L. N. G. Malbrain

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Administration of intravenous fluid is one of the most commonly applied therapies in critical care, and has evolved from the replacement of water and electrolytes lost in diarrhoeal illness to the concept of ‘optimising’ cardiac output and thus, it is often incorrectly assumed as tissue perfusion [1]. As critical care transitions from a historical focus on normalisation of physiology towards the rigorous application of evidence-based practices which result in the best possible long-term outcomes, a re-evaluation of the role of basic therapies, such as intravenous fluids, is necessary. …

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Malbrain MLNG, Van Regenmortel N, Saugel B et al (2018) Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D’s and the four phases of fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 8:66CrossRef

Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul J-L et al (2015) Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: a global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med 41:1529–1537CrossRef

Van der Mullen J, Wise R, Vermeulen G et al (2018) Assessment of hypovolaemia in the critically ill. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 50:141–149CrossRef

Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43:304–377CrossRef

Hernandez G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Damiani LP et al (2019) Effect of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels on 28-day mortality among patients with septic shock. JAMA 321:654–711CrossRef

Lammi MR, Aiello B, Burg GT et al (2015) Response to fluid boluses in the fluid and catheter treatment trial. Chest 148:919–926CrossRef

Bjerregaard MR, Hjortrup PB, Perner A (2019) Indications for fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock: post-hoc analyses of the CLASSIC trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 63:337–343CrossRef

Glassford NJ, Eastwood GM, Bellomo R (2014) Physiological changes after fluid bolus therapy in sepsis: a systematic review of the contemporary literature. Crit Care 18:696CrossRef

Silversides JA, Major E, Ferguson AJ et al (2017) Conservative fluid management or deresuscitation for patients with sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome following the resuscitation phase of critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 43:155–170CrossRef

10.

Prowle JR, Chua H-R, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R (2012) Clinical review: volume of fluid resuscitation and the incidence of acute kidney injury—a systematic review. Crit Care 16:230CrossRef

11.

Malbrain MLNG, Marik PE, Witters I et al (2014) Fluid overload, de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or injured patients: a systematic review with suggestions for clinical practice. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 46:361–380CrossRef

12.

Byrne L, Obonyo NG, Diab SD et al (2018) Unintended consequences: fluid resuscitation worsens shock in an ovine model of endotoxemia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 198:1043–1054CrossRef

13.

García MIM, González PG, Romero MG et al (2015) Effects of fluid administration on arterial load in septic shock patients. Intensive Care Med 41:1247–1255CrossRef

14.

Ince C (2015) Hemodynamic coherence and the rationale for monitoring the microcirculation. Crit Care 19:S8CrossRef

15.

Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul J-L (2016) Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 42:1935–1947CrossRef

16.

Miller A, Mandeville J (2016) Predicting and measuring fluid responsiveness with echocardiography. Echo Res Pract 3:G1–G12CrossRef

17.

Jacobs R, Lochy S, Malbrain MLNG (2019) Phenylephrine-induced recruitable preload from the venous side. J Clin Monit Comput 33:373–376CrossRef

18.

Hjortrup PB, Haase N, Bundgaard H et al (2016) Restricting volumes of resuscitation fluid in adults with septic shock after initial management: the CLASSIC randomised, parallel-group, multicentre feasibility trial. Intensive Care Med 42:1695–1705CrossRef

19.

Russell JA, Gordon AC, Walley KR (2019) Early may be better: early low-dose norepinephrine in septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 199:1049–1051CrossRef

20.

Van Regenmortel N, Verbrugghe W, Roelant E et al (2018) Maintenance fluid therapy and fluid creep impose more significant fluid, sodium, and chloride burdens than resuscitation fluids in critically ill patients: a retrospective study in a tertiary mixed ICU population. Intensive Care Med 44:409–417CrossRef

21.

Cordemans C, De laet I, Van Regenmortel N et al (2012) Aiming for a negative fluid balance in patients with acute lung injury and increased intra- abdominal pressure: a pilot study looking at the effects of PAL-treatment. Ann Intensive Care 2:S15CrossRef

22.

Martin GS, Moss M, Wheeler AP et al (2005) A randomized, controlled trial of furosemide with or without albumin in hypoproteinemic patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 33:1681–1687CrossRef

Titel: Liberal versus restrictive fluid therapy in critically ill patients
verfasst von: Jonathan A. Silversides
Anders Perner
Manu L. N. G. Malbrain
Publikationsdatum: 09.08.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05713-y

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Springer Medizin

Liberal versus restrictive fluid therapy in critically ill patients

Excerpt

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Update AINS

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

Less is More: not (always) simple—the case of extracorporeal devices in critical care

Focus on fluid therapy in critically ill patients

‘The pause’: honouring the passing of a patient or a collective countertransference for healthcare providers?

Focus on paediatrics

Mechanisms for hemodynamic instability related to renal replacement therapy: a narrative review

Diagnostic yield of lumbar puncture in adult patients with purpura fulminans

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Update AINS