Background
Depression is considered an important public health problem owing to its high prevalence rate [
1]. It has been predicted that depression will be the second leading cause of disability by 2020 [
2]. University students belong to a particular population undergoing a crucial period of transition during which they are required to make major life decisions and prepare for their future. In this critical stage of development, they may encounter diverse problems such as adjustment to a new environment away from home, financial stress, and academic difficulties. As a reaction to this stress, they may suffer from depression without realizing they are depressed. Previous studies have shown that depressive symptoms among university students are substantial around the world [
3‐
6], and the prevalence rate appears to be increasing [
7,
8]. Depression has been emphasized in university students, because depressive symptoms have a negative effect on academic performance [
9] and in severe cases may even lead to suicide [
10].
Previous studies on the mental health of university students have mainly investigated the prevalence of depressive or anxiety symptoms and related sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, family history of psychiatric disorders, and living or financial situation [
3,
11]. Low positive emotions as well as high negative emotions are vulnerable factors for both the development and maintenance of depression [
12]. The benefits of positive emotions are particularly relevant to those suffering from depression, since positive emotions have been shown to facilitate recovery from the cardiovascular effects of negative emotions [
13,
14] and to buffer against relapses [
15]. Nevertheless, most previous studies on depression have mainly focused on negative emotions. Contrary to traditional psychology, positive psychology is primarily concerned with positive aspects of life such as life satisfaction, happiness, gratitude, and resilience rather than psychological deficits [
16]. Although life satisfaction and happiness are a broad and non-specific perception, they are important contributors to subjective well-being [
17] and have been widely studied owing to their interactive effects on mental health [
18,
19]. Positive cognitions and emotions have been shown to be strong predictors of happiness that alleviate automatic negative thoughts that can lead to depression [
20], suggesting that higher levels of happiness may have a protective effect on depression. Conversely, dissatisfaction with life has been reported to predict depression longitudinally as well as to be associated with concurrent depressive symptoms [
21]. Among the various clinical factors, alcohol consumption [
22,
23] and sleep disturbance [
24] have been particularly associated with depression.
Despite the research evidence concerning the significant role of positive psychology in improving mental health [
16,
25], there have only been a few studies focusing on the impact of life satisfaction and happiness on depressive symptoms among university students, and the sample sizes have been relatively small. Similarly, there are limited studies on the prevalence and correlates of depressive symptoms in this population in Korea. For these reasons, we investigated the impact of life satisfaction and happiness on depressive symptoms as well as the prevalence and associated factors of depression in a large sample of university students.
Discussion
In the current study, we investigated the impact of life satisfaction and happiness as well as the current status and correlates of depressive symptoms in a large sample of Korean university students. Our study demonstrated that life satisfaction and happiness were significantly associated with a lower risk of depression, whereas hazardous alcohol consumption and poor sleep quality were related to a higher risk of depression. Our results also showed specific sociodemographic correlates of depressive symptoms.
Our study indicated that 13.4% of the sample was experiencing depression; a finding that is similar to previous studies with Korean and Chinese university students [
5,
37]. Meanwhile, the rate is lower than what has been found in some other studies including samples from the United States and European and Middle Eastern countries reporting prevalence rates of 25–29% [
38,
39] and 30–33% in meta-analyses [
40,
41]. Koreans have exhibited a higher diagnostic threshold for major depression than have Americans, which results in a lower prevalence of major depression [
42]. Koreans are more likely to express the symptoms of fatigue and concentration difficulty, but are less likely to express depressed mood and suicidal ideation than Americans. Hence, cross-cultural differences may influence a lower prevalence rate of depression. In addition, the different scales may partly account for the differences found among studies, because commonly used scales have fewer common and specific factors of depressive symptoms than expected [
43]. Regardless of such differences, our results suggest that a substantial number of students experience depression. Therefore, active efforts to evaluate underlying depression should be encouraged, to improve the mental health of students.
Students with depression showed a lower level of life satisfaction and happiness than non-depressed students. Our logistic regression analysis further indicated that individuals with higher levels of life satisfaction and happiness had a decreased probability of having depression. As Seligman pointed out, positive psychology includes various aspects such as well-being and satisfaction (past); flow, joy, the sensual pleasures, and happiness (present); and constructive cognitions about the future [
44]. In the current study, we adopted major components of past and present aspects of positive psychology. Our findings suggest that past and present aspects of positive psychology can play an important role in prevention of depression. In line with the results of the current study, it was found that life satisfaction negatively correlated with depressive symptoms in students [
45]. Meanwhile, in a previous study using a large cohort sample of middle-aged people, the absence of psychological well-being was a significant risk factor for subsequent depression [
46].
These previous studies and our results provide evidence regarding the protective role of life satisfaction and happiness on depression among university students. A promising approach to enhance well-being, positive psychological interventions (PPI) that aim to foster positive cognitions, emotions, or behaviors have been applied to treat a variety of psychiatric disorders [
47,
48]. PPI can be particularly useful for depression characterized by a paucity of positive emotions, life meanings, and engagements [
47]. A meta-analytic review found that PPI improved well-being and decreased depressive symptoms [
49]. Our findings suggest that PPI, focusing on the improvement of life satisfaction and happiness, can be applied to depression in clinical practice. Interestingly, participants who had a depressed mood and voluntarily participated were more likely to benefit from PPI, implying that providing motivation and encouragement may be important in the implementation of PPI. Taken together, development and application of the life satisfaction and happiness-focused novel mental health programs addressing self-motivation may contribute to the prevention and management of depression on college campuses.
Alcohol use is common among university students, often leading to alcohol use disorders such as alcohol abuse and dependence [
50]. Alcohol use and depression may be closely associated because individuals who suffer from one disorder are susceptible to the other [
23]. Results of our study support this bidirectional relationship. Further, logistic regression analysis indicated that higher levels of hazardous alcohol consumption increased the probability of having depression. It has been shown that interventions including motivational interviewing and personalized normative feedback are effective modalities for reducing alcohol drinking in students [
51]. Considering the high prevalence of hazardous alcohol use [
52] and its significant effect on depression, efforts to perform screening and intervention programs for alcohol abuse are warranted on campuses. With regard to sleep quality, we found that individuals with poorer sleep quality had an increased probability of having depression. Similarly, previous research found that sleep problems indicated an underlying depression in university students [
53], and there is increasing evidence that suggests chronic insomnia is a strong risk factor for the development of depression [
24]. Moreover, our results revealed that all individual components of the PSQI, as well as global sleep quality were significantly associated with depressive symptoms. This suggests that diverse aspects of sleep quality including sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction may influence depression in students. Because hazardous alcohol use and sleep disturbances are each associated with depressive symptoms, students who have both may be at an especially high risk for depression. For the university health service, this point should be considered as an important issue.
The prevalence rate of depression was significantly higher in female students than in male students, which is consistent with a higher lifetime prevalence of depression found in women among the general population [
1]. This is in line with findings of previous studies reporting that female students had a higher rate of depressive symptoms than male students [
4,
54]. As one explanation for this finding, a cross-national study of health proposed that gender differences are greater in countries with greater gender inequalities regarding political rights and job opportunities [
55]. However, some researchers have found no significant difference according to gender [
5,
38], indicating the reasons for the inconsistency need to be further investigated.
We found that depressive symptoms were associated with perception of body shape as being obese. Koreans are thought to be preoccupied with body image, regardless of actual body weight [
56]. Moreover, social norms overemphasize maintaining thinness as a focus of self-presentation in Korea [
56]. Therefore, Korean people who perceive their body shape to be obese are likely to be more dissatisfied with their body image compared to those who do not perceive themselves as such. In this regard, a previous study revealed that body image concern, especially obesity, was a mediating factor in the relationship between body weight and depressive symptoms among Korean adults [
57]. However, studies focusing on the association of body image concern with depression in university students are limited. Therefore, longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate the role of body image concern on depression among students.
Previous studies have consistently reported that lower socioeconomic status was a significant risk factor for depressive symptoms in university students [
5,
54]. Interestingly, in our study, the level of subjective pocket money was found to be a significant correlate of depressive symptoms, whereas subjective socioeconomic status was not. In fact, satisfaction or dissatisfaction with economic circumstances has been well established for its significant role in mental health [
58]. In addition, one’s personal financial condition such as pocket money may be different from subjective socioeconomic status. Our findings imply that personal financial difficulties rather than simply subjective socioeconomic status would be a more important correlate of current depressive symptoms in students.
This study has several limitations and future research should address them. Firstly, because the design of this study was cross-sectional, it is difficult to make causal inferences. A prospective longitudinal study is needed to confirm the causal relationships suggested by our findings. Secondly, we evaluated depression using the BDI without the clinical interview. Additional clinical interviews with those scoring above a cutoff score of the BDI would be helpful to elaborate factors associated with depression in future studies. Thirdly, there is the potential of sampling bias because the selection of participants was based on convenience sampling, limiting the generalizability of our findings. Nevertheless, the large sample size and the use of a validated scale to identify depressive symptoms might have ensured the validity of the results. Fourthly, objective data regarding body image and economic status were not obtained. Moreover, this study did not evaluate specific and major issues related to university students such as school life, academic performance, anxiety, and suicide. Thus, further study on these issues is needed to develop specialized mental health program for university students. Finally, due to the nature of self-report measures, the results of this study should be interpreted cautiously. However, participants were assured confidentiality by anonymous questionnaires, which can reduce the possibility of dishonesty. Regardless of these limitations, the present study could provide valuable information regarding the current status and associated factors of depression among university students.
Authors’ contributions
Study concept and design of article: EHS, SHK, HJY. Data collection: SGK, SHK, JHK, JHP. Interpretation of data: EHS, SGK, SHK, HJY. Writing draft: EHS, HJY. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.