Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2021

12.10.2020 | Medical Ophthalmology

Lighting conditions and perceived visual function in ophthalmic conditions

verfasst von: Efrat Fleissig, Eddie Appenbrick, Guy Brock, Charles C. Barr

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the influence of different lighting conditions on perceived visual function in patients of different age, gender, race, and in various ophthalmic diseases.

Methods

A prospective study. A survey given to patients seen in general ophthalmic and retina clinics. Patients were asked four questions: Is your vision better, worse, or the same in (1) bright light vs dim light, (2) indoors or outdoors, (3) beginning or end of the day, and (4) sunny or cloudy day? Parameters tested were age, race, gender, visual acuity, and a variety of ophthalmic conditions. Multivariable models for each question were fit using multinomial regression. Association was considered significant if p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 722 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients with lower vision (LogMAR ≥ 0.3) were more likely to indicate they either had better vision indoors or outdoors compared with better vision patients (LogMAR < 0.1). Patients with pseudophakia were also more likely to indicate they had better vision on a cloudy day (OR = 1.9). White patients had double the odds of selecting bright light compared with others. Males were less likely than females to indicate better vision indoors (OR = 0.62). There were no significant associations with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the multivariable model.

Conclusions

Most patients did not note any difference in lighting conditions, and although there is explanatory rational for some of the findings in this study, those questions concerning lighting conditions or time of day are not useful for screening of disease. Gender and ethnicity were found to have associations with lighting preferences which needs to be further studied.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sloan LL (1968) The photopic acuity-luminance function with special reference to parafoveal vision. Vis Res 8:901–911CrossRef Sloan LL (1968) The photopic acuity-luminance function with special reference to parafoveal vision. Vis Res 8:901–911CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sloan LL (1969) Variation of acuity with luminance in ocular diseases and anomalies. Doc Ophthalmol 26:384–393CrossRef Sloan LL (1969) Variation of acuity with luminance in ocular diseases and anomalies. Doc Ophthalmol 26:384–393CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu L, Wang Y, Liu J, Liu W (2018) Retinal-image quality and contrast sensitivity function in eyes with epiretinal membrane: a cross-sectional observational clinical study. BMC Ophthalmol 18:290CrossRef Liu L, Wang Y, Liu J, Liu W (2018) Retinal-image quality and contrast sensitivity function in eyes with epiretinal membrane: a cross-sectional observational clinical study. BMC Ophthalmol 18:290CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Safi H, Safi S, Hafezi-Moghadam A, Ahmadieh H (2018) Early detection of diabetic retinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol 63:601–608CrossRef Safi H, Safi S, Hafezi-Moghadam A, Ahmadieh H (2018) Early detection of diabetic retinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol 63:601–608CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortiz C, Jiménez JR, Pérez-Ocón F, Castro JJ, González-Anera R (2010) Retinal-image quality and contrast-sensitivity function in age-related macular degeneration. Curr Eye Res 35:757–761CrossRef Ortiz C, Jiménez JR, Pérez-Ocón F, Castro JJ, González-Anera R (2010) Retinal-image quality and contrast-sensitivity function in age-related macular degeneration. Curr Eye Res 35:757–761CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta L, Cvintal V, Delvadia R, Sun Y et al (2017) SPARCS and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity testing in normal controls and patients with cataract. Eye (Lond) 31:753–761CrossRef Gupta L, Cvintal V, Delvadia R, Sun Y et al (2017) SPARCS and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity testing in normal controls and patients with cataract. Eye (Lond) 31:753–761CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolkstein M, Atkin A, Bodis-Wollner I (1980) Contrast sensitivity in retinal disease. Ophthalmology 87:1140–1149CrossRef Wolkstein M, Atkin A, Bodis-Wollner I (1980) Contrast sensitivity in retinal disease. Ophthalmology 87:1140–1149CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fatehi N, Nowroozizadeh S, Henry S, Coleman AL, Caprioli J, Nouri-Mahdavi K (2017) Association of structural and functional measures with contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 178:129–139CrossRef Fatehi N, Nowroozizadeh S, Henry S, Coleman AL, Caprioli J, Nouri-Mahdavi K (2017) Association of structural and functional measures with contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 178:129–139CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pelli DG, Bex P (2013) Measuring contrast sensitivity. Vis Res 90:10–14CrossRef Pelli DG, Bex P (2013) Measuring contrast sensitivity. Vis Res 90:10–14CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabin J (1994) Luminance effects on visual acuity and small letter contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci 71:685–688CrossRef Rabin J (1994) Luminance effects on visual acuity and small letter contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci 71:685–688CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark TG, Altman DG (2003) Developing a prognostic model in the presence of missing data: an ovarian cancer case study. J Clin Epidemiol 56:28–37CrossRef Clark TG, Altman DG (2003) Developing a prognostic model in the presence of missing data: an ovarian cancer case study. J Clin Epidemiol 56:28–37CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57:289–300 Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57:289–300
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bierings RAJM, van Sonderen FLP, Jansonius NM (2018) Visual complaints of patients with glaucoma and controls under optimal and extreme luminance conditions. Acta Ophthalmol 96:288–294CrossRef Bierings RAJM, van Sonderen FLP, Jansonius NM (2018) Visual complaints of patients with glaucoma and controls under optimal and extreme luminance conditions. Acta Ophthalmol 96:288–294CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Blumberg DM, Liebmann JM, Hirji SH, Hood DC (2019) Diffuse macular damage in mild to moderate glaucoma is associated with decreased visual function scores under low luminance conditions. Am J Ophthalmol 208:415–420CrossRef Blumberg DM, Liebmann JM, Hirji SH, Hood DC (2019) Diffuse macular damage in mild to moderate glaucoma is associated with decreased visual function scores under low luminance conditions. Am J Ophthalmol 208:415–420CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chellappa SL, Steiner R, Oelhafen P, Cajochen C (2017) Sex differences in light sensitivity impact on brightness perception, vigilant attention and sleep in humans. Sci Rep 7:14215CrossRef Chellappa SL, Steiner R, Oelhafen P, Cajochen C (2017) Sex differences in light sensitivity impact on brightness perception, vigilant attention and sleep in humans. Sci Rep 7:14215CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cowan RL, Frederick BB, Rainey M, Levin JM et al (2000) Sex differences in response to red and blue light in human primary visual cortex: a bold fMRI study. Psychiatry Res 100:129–138CrossRef Cowan RL, Frederick BB, Rainey M, Levin JM et al (2000) Sex differences in response to red and blue light in human primary visual cortex: a bold fMRI study. Psychiatry Res 100:129–138CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Den Berg TJ, Van Rijn LJ, Michael R, Heine C et al (2007) Straylight effects with aging and lens extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 144:358–363CrossRef Van Den Berg TJ, Van Rijn LJ, Michael R, Heine C et al (2007) Straylight effects with aging and lens extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 144:358–363CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cerviño A, Hosking SL, Montés-Micó R, Alió JL (2008) Retinal straylight in patients with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:441–446CrossRef Cerviño A, Hosking SL, Montés-Micó R, Alió JL (2008) Retinal straylight in patients with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:441–446CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R, Cerviño A, Alfonso JF (2009) Light scatter and disability glare after intraocular lens implantation. Arch Ophthalmol 127:576–580CrossRef Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R, Cerviño A, Alfonso JF (2009) Light scatter and disability glare after intraocular lens implantation. Arch Ophthalmol 127:576–580CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Lighting conditions and perceived visual function in ophthalmic conditions
verfasst von
Efrat Fleissig
Eddie Appenbrick
Guy Brock
Charles C. Barr
Publikationsdatum
12.10.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04960-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.