Background
Psychological principlea | Program components | Theoretical methodsb, c |
---|---|---|
Social contagion Social networks can facilitate the spread of attitudes and behavior and increase the reach and intensity of a message. Stoptober used traditional and new mass media channels to create a mass quitting trigger and actively support a social movement around stopping smoking. Positive messaging was used to build engagement, enhance message dissemination and normalize quitting behavior. Stoptober aimed to increase support for the campaign, and to motivate smokers to participate and encourage others to do so too, since interconnected groups of smokers often try to quit together. | Press exposure, television and radio broadcasts include the message that Stoptober is coming up and all smokers should participate and try to quit smoking temporarily on the same date. Non-smokers are encouraged to support smokers in their participation. | Increase awareness of Stoptober Increase awareness of the advantages of smoking cessation Persuasive communication Mobilizing social network support Increasing feelings of self-efficacy |
The Stoptober camper travels to various parts of the country to reach a large number of people. The camper personnel provide information about smoking cessation and encourage participants to take part in Stoptober. | Increase awareness of the advantages of smoking cessation Increased awareness of Stoptober Persuasive communication Increasing feelings of self-efficacy | |
SMART goals SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time-sensitive) goals help people to achieve a difficult behavior changes, such as stopping smoking for good. Therefore, Stoptober challenged smokers to set an intermediary goal, i.e., to stop smoking for a time-limited period. This goal may be relatively easy to achieve, and once achieved, it substantially increases the chances of becoming a permanent non-smoker. | Set time and duration of collective cessation attempt. Stoptober challenges smokers not to smoke for 28 days during the month October. | Goal-setting theory Implementation intentions Increasing feelings of self-efficacy |
PRIME theory PRIME theory is a comprehensive theory of motivation. Behavior is determined from moment to moment by a wide variety of motivational inputs, while the motivational system is unstable and requires constant balancing of inputs to maintain a certain behavior (e.g. smoking). Programs that aim to achieve behavior change, e.g. quitting smoking, should offer a range of support that triggers the whole motivational system rather than single elements.d This support should both weaken the motivational powers that cause the behavior (e.g. smoking) and create new sources of desire and control to refrain from that behavior (e.g. quitting smoking). Therefore, Stoptober offered an elaborate support package, consisting of Twitter messages, ambassadors, video diaries, a Facebook community, social media profile logos and an app. This support package aims to decrease the motivation to smoke and create new desires to quit smoking. | Subscription on the website to have access to the Stoptober app, a free magazine and newsletters | Goal setting theory Implementation intentions |
Email messages with tips, progress, motivational messages and news | Positive reinforcement Persuasive communication Increasing feelings of self-efficacy | |
Bracelets to wear during the campaign to remind participants not to smoke and demonstrate their commitment to others | Public commitment Social support Positive reinforcement | |
Twitter account wherein Stoptober frequently posts positive and encouraging messages for the participants | Positive reinforcement Persuasive communication Belief selection | |
Well-known ambassadors participate in Stoptober, try to gain publicity for the program through their media presence and serve as examples for other participants. | Increase awareness of Stoptober Persuasive communication Mass media role modeling Provide opportunities for social comparison | |
Video diaries of Stoptober participants on YouTube and Facebook. | Social support Role modeling Opportunities for social comparison | |
Facebook page wherein Stoptober frequently posts positive and encouraging messages for the participants and where they can share their accomplishments and struggles. Participants can share tips, compliments and encouragement. | Positive reinforcement Persuasive communication Belief selection Mobilizing social networks Opportunities for social comparison Advice on relapse prevention: • Counterconditioning • Cue altering • Stimulus control • Planning coping responses • Resisting social pressure • Providing contingent rewards Increasing feelings of self-efficacy | |
Stoptober logos for Facebook profile pictures to notify friends and family of their participation. | Public commitment Mobilizing social support Mobilizing social networks | |
Stoptober app keeps track of abstinence, amount of money saved and number of unsmoked cigarettes. Participants can earn achievement badges and press an ‘emergency’ button to help with cravings. | Self-monitoring of behavior Positive reinforcement Persuasive communication Advice on relapse prevention: • Counterconditioning • Cue altering • Stimulus control • Planning coping responses • Resisting social pressure • Providing contingent rewards Increasing feelings of self-efficacy |
Methods
Design
Participant selection
Setting
Respondent | Abstinent during Stoptober | Quit smoking at time of interview | Former daily cigarette consumption | Former participation | Additional support |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Yes | No (reduction) | 1 pack | Yes | – |
2 | No (reduction) | No (reduction) | 1f.5 pack | No | – |
3 | Yes | Yes | 1 pack | No | Varenicline (prescribed by GP) |
4 | Yes | Yes | e-cigarettes | No | e-cigarettes (self-obtained) |
5 | Yes | Yes | 1 pack | No | e-cigarettes (self-obtained) |
6 | No | No | 1 pack | No | e-cigarettes (self-obtained) |
7 | Yes | Yes | 1.5 pack | No | – |
8 | Yes | Yes | 1 pack | No | Hypnosis (self-organized) |
9 | No (reduction) | Incidental smoking | 1 pack | No | Varenicline (prescribed by GP) |
10 | Yes | Yes | More than 1 pack | No | – |
11 | Yes | Yes | 10 cigarettes | No | Varenicline (prescribed by GP) |
12 | Yes | Yes | 1 pack | No | – |
13 | Yes | Yes | 1 pack | No | – |
14 | Yes | Relapsed, a few puffs | 1 pack | Yes | NRTa (self-obtained) |
15 | Yes | Yes | About 1 pack | No | |
16 | Yes | Yes | 25 cigarettes | Yes | Self-help book (self-obtained) |
17 | Yes | Yes | 1 pack | Yes | – |
18 | Yes | Yes | 1 pack | No | NRTa (self-obtained) |
19 | Yes | Yes | 1 pack | No | – |
20 | Yes | Yes | 1 pack | Yes | Support group (organized with colleagues) |
21 | Yes | Yes | More than 1 pack | No | – |
22 | Yes | Yes | 10–15 cigarettes | No | Individual counselling with smoking cessation psychologist (approached by psychologist) |
23 | Yes | Yes | 1 pack | No | – |
Data collection
Data analysis
Prior to campaign | Rationale to quit smoking | |
Rationale for participation in Stoptober | ||
Smoking behavior | ||
Experiences during campaign | Difficult moments | Withdrawal |
Addiction | ||
Stress | ||
Positive experiences | ||
Additional support | Medication | |
Other support | ||
Strategies to break habit | Reduce smoking | |
Farewell ritual | ||
Role modeling | ||
Relapse prevention | ||
Compliments | ||
Rewards | ||
Anticipated regret | ||
Resistance to social pressure | ||
Public commitment | ||
Counterconditioning | ||
Substitute behavior | ||
Cue avoidance | ||
Cue altering | ||
Self-talk | ||
Self-management | ||
Goal setting | ||
Behavioral determinants | Attitude | |
Social influence | Social support | |
Injunctive norm | ||
Descriptive norm | ||
Social pressure | ||
Self-efficacy | Confidence in success | |
Habit | ||
Identity | ||
Motivational strength | ||
Future | Confidence in maintaining abstinence | |
High risk situations | Action plans | |
Intervention components | General | Other |
Facebook | ||
App | ||
Mass media | ||
Ambassadors | ||
Set date and time | ||
Needs |
Results
Support experienced
Before the campaign you frequently saw commercials on the television with the announcement that Stoptober was coming up. And [ … ] because I saw it so often, I thought: “This might be something, should I participate or not?” And eventually, after seeing it several times, I thought: “Let’s just try it, I will do it.” [R02]
These accounts also indicate how the mass media approach may have contributed to the normalization of smoking cessation and strengthened the respondents’ social support and self-efficacy to quit.It makes you think about it. [ … ] I saw that many people had registered. It would be a nice stimulus, a good moment. [ … ] So many smokers are going to quit, so I should be able to succeed again too. [R07]
And the date. You often try to set a date. Most people do it [try to quit] at New Years. But we just didn’t have a date anymore because we’d tried so many times already. [ … ] With New Years, you don’t participate together with so many others. [R18]
Although experienced as improving their self-efficacy at the start, respondents also stated that at some point in time, they had realized their temporary quit goal was only a trick to distract themselves from the ultimate goal of quitting for good.Look, you can always give it a try. It’s a month, it is not like you are quitting entirely, because then you would dread it. You would feel stressed and think: CIGARETTE!!!. This is ideal. [R02]
The respondents’ reports clearly illustrate how the variety of support offered by Stoptober (in line with PRIME theory) had supported them in their attempt to quit by allowing them to make an individual selection based on their personal needs and preferences. “You use whatever suits your needs.” [R12] For example, while some respondents thought the Stoptober app had been most supportive, others found that the Stoptober Facebook page had offered the best help.It’s just like you are fooling yourself, actually. It is quitting for 28 days, with the idea: “After 28 days I can smoke again”, and that is what makes you hold on. [ … ] [But] eventually you realize that quitting for 28 days, well, you don’t accomplish anything with that. [Because] it’s temporary. [R19]
I have to say, that [the app] really works. You get notifications like “you saved this much [money]”, “you have received this badge” or “you can taste better now”. [ … ] And it was true and it made me think: “YES, let’s go for the next one. For me, that was a great tool”. [R15]
These accounts indicate that the Stoptober app primarily served as a self-monitoring tool, while Facebook mainly provided a platform for exchanging experiences, making social comparisons, and providing and receiving social support.For me the stories on Facebook were of greater use. So, they [Stoptober] posted a message [on the Facebook page]. Many people reacted to this, and from that you could read: “Well, they are also going through a difficult time”. [ … ] And when some said: “I smoked a cigarette”, others would say [ … ]: “Don’t worry, never mind, just keep on going”. [ … ] It is really nice, because you can share [experiences]. [R14]
Further need for support
Another incongruity was reported when about halfway into the campaign, Stoptober started to communicate through the app that the participants had (almost) achieved cessation, while the respondents stated that for most of them, this was not yet the case.At a certain point, I felt that it [the Stoptober posts] worked negatively. [ … ] In the beginning you are always thinking of smoking. You don’t want that anymore. And when you think of smoking less and less, you receive messages on smoking cessation once in a while. So [ … ] after three weeks, I thought: “No, [..] not all those pop-ups and notifications.” I switched them all off. [R03]
The respondents reported a need for adjusted support, for instance by offering a broader variety of announcements, feedback messages and role-model stories, or including more interactive and personal elements.But, after that I realized that Stoptober was like: “Yes, you did it, already two weeks!” [ … ] I saw that people were quite angry about this. [ … ] The addiction is gone, but if I think of how strong that thing is what’s still in your head. That is real too. I think that maybe people, [ … ] maybe also Stoptober [ … ], underestimate how strong that part still is. [R17]
A bit more interaction. [ … ] That [Stoptober] will make itself heard a bit more, except for posting a message. Also replies on all responses. Will enter into debates. [ … ] That they will react with positive feedback or advice. [R08]
Respondents also referred to additional social network components. While some suggested connecting Stoptober to other online social networks (e.g. Instagram), more prominent were the respondents’ desires for additional offline social networks.Yes [the emergency button of the app], did not help very much. But, I wouldn’t know how to change it. That’s really difficult right? I would prefer having someone [a real person] jump out and saying: “DON’T DO IT!” [laughter]. [R21]
Find people within Stoptober with whom you can talk before or after. [ … ] I think that this will also be a motivation for people to remain abstinent. [ … ] I would have liked it if there was an activity nearby for people who had also quit smoking. [ … ] In that way, you get to know someone and can support each other. [R05]
This need for offline social networks was explained by the lack of social support and the strong pro-smoking social norm that respondents mostly experienced from their personal social networks.I participated last year too, then I did not succeed. [ … ] So, I went looking, beforehand. [ … ] How nice would it be to quit together with others? [ … ] A colleague of mine, [ … ] was also thinking about it [quitting]. I thought, well then, let’s just organize it collectively for all coworkers. That went really well. We have all quit smoking. [R20]
I’m far away from my family here. I don’t speak to them daily or weekly. Also, with friends, [ … ] I told them I quit, but many of them still smoke and they don’t think of stimulating, motivating or supporting me. It’s more like they think, well … [ … ] So, something is lacking from my direct environment. [R02]
I don’t have someone close to me that makes me think: “That one is going to pull me through it.” You understand? Intensive counselling or something. I really need someone. [R06]
Follow-up support
I believe that those 28 days, those were the starting point, also for me. But well, you cannot expect it all to be gone afterwards. But, it is true that the physical part is over then, all discomforts, that is true. [R17]
These accounts indicate that the SMART goal had indeed contributed to the respondents’ self-efficacy, but it was not sufficient for most of them to continue as a non-smoker on their own.But, afterwards it feels like going into the deep end. [ … ] Why don’t they continue? Why that month? That is just not smoking for a month and lighting your cigarette again afterwards. And hoping that people won’t do that. No, you have to push through then! [R08]
Second, respondents illustrated how Stoptober participants could continue to support each other after the campaign through the online or offline social networks they had established during the campaign.The Stoptober app should continue. I have another app like that and that one keeps counting how long you have been abstinent, how many cigarettes, how much money you saved. [ … ] I would certainly do that. [R08]
Third, respondents thought Stoptober could connect to regular smoking-cessation services and stimulate participants to make use of available follow-up support, such as individual counseling or group support.Someone started a private [Facebook] group: We quit smoking 2016. 539 members. There are also posts. Well, then you read those messages. It just helps. It is really useful. [R03]
Despite their critical remarks and suggestions for improvement, in general, respondents believed that in line with social contagion theory, Stoptober could play an important role in the normalization of smoking cessation.And I think that if you, at that moment, use a powerful tool, like: “Listen everyone, well done, keep holding on”. That you give a good follow up. [ … ] That you get some more advice: “Here you can sign up for this training”. Very practical tools. [R20]
I think the initiative is good, because [smoking] is a problem and it is good that there is an official organization stepping forward that helps people [with smoking cessation], because if it is just constantly tolerated and accepted [ … ]. It is good to have this wake-up call. [ … ] [R20]