From Sickness to Health: The Twentieth-Century Development of U.S. Health Insurance

doi:10.1006/exeh.2002.0788

Explorations in Economic History

Volume 39, Issue 3, July 2002, Pages 233-253

https://doi.org/10.1006/exeh.2002.0788 Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper explores the institutional development of health insurance in the United States. By combining a qualitative history of the development of the market with an empirical analysis of a panel of health insurance data from 1931–1955, the paper identifies a number of factors that influenced the growth of the health insurance market. While demand factors such as increasing income and improvements in medical technology certainly contributed to the growth of the market, supply side factors were also important. There is evidence that hospitals may have contributed to the growth of health insurance as a means of smoothing revenues during the Great Depression. State-level policies that allowed the Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans to operate as nonprofits also spurred market growth, as did federal government policies that promoted the link between employment and health insurance.

References (54)

Diane M. Dewar
Do Those with More Formal Education Have Better Health Insurance Opportunities?
Economics of Education Review
(1998)
J.C.Herbert. Emery
Risky Business? Nonactuarial Pricing Practices and the Financial Viability of Fraternal Sickness Insurers
Explorations in Economic History
(1996)
American Medicine, Volume II
(1937)
American Hospital Association, (various years), Hospitals: The Journal of the American Hospital Association, Chicago,...
Odin W. Anderson
State Enabling Legislation for Non-Profit Hospital and Medical Plans
(1944)
Odin W. Anderson
The Uneasy Equilibrium.
(1968)
Bradford, David, F, and, Logue, Kyle, D. 1996, The Effects of Tax-Law Changes on Prices in the Property-Casualty...
Bulletin of the American Hospital Association, Volume, IV,...
Dennis J. Chasse
The American Association for Labor Legislation and the Institutionalist Tradition in National Health Insurance
Journal of Economic Issues
(1994)
Collins, William, J, and, Thomasson, Melissa, A. 2002, Exploring the Racial Gap in Infant Mortality Rates, 1920–1970....

Council on Medical Education of the American Medical Association, (various years), Hospital Service in the United...

Robert D. Eilers

Regulation of Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans

(1963)

George Emery et al.

A Young Man's Benefit: The Independent Order of Odd Fellows and Sickness Insurance in the United States and Canada

(1999)

I.S. Falk et al.

The Cost of Medical Care

(1933)

Pamela J. Farley et al.

Household Wealth and Health Insurance as Protection against Medical Risks

Edwin J. Faulkner

Health Insurance

(1960)

Price V. Fishback et al.

The Durable Experiment: State Insurance of Workers' Compensation Risk in the Early Twentieth Century

Journal of Economic History

(1996)

Abraham Flexner

Medical Education in the United States and Canada

(1910)

Franz Goldmann

Voluntary Medical Care in the United States

(1948)

William H. Greene

Econometric Analysis

(1993)

Health Insurance Institute, (various years), Source Book of Health Insurance Data, New York, Health Insurance...

Fredric R. Hedinger

The Social Role of Blue Cross as a Device for Financing the Costs of Hospital Care: An Evaluation

(1966)

Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (no date), Historical, Demographic, Economic, And Social...

Journal of the American Medical Association, various...

Judith Walter Leavitt

Brought to Bed

(1986)

David McCahan

Accident and Sickness Insurance

(1954)

Cited by (68)

Healthcare as asset: Private equity investment and the changing geographies of care in the United States
2023, Geoforum
This article considers what private equity’s (PE) growing interest in the healthcare industry means for the geographies of healthcare provisioning in the United States. PE firms invest in healthcare providers and spaces, treating these investments similar to their traditional investment assets, which subjects healthcare, a vital service, to often austere management tactics and financial engineering. Our work builds on critiques emerging from the healthcare community about the negative effects – and even dangers - of this mode of funding. A geographical reading raises questions about this form of investment that are simultaneously political, ethical, and practical: whose sickness provides profit, where and how is care provisioned, and what impacts--if any-- does this form of investment have on the quality of care and life? To answer these questions, we mobilise feminist geographical approaches to finance and care to consider the impacts of PE investments on the provisioning of US healthcare. Specifically, this article examines urgent care centers (UCCs) and telehealth in the United State. We conduct a content and discourse analysis of investor, analyst, and industry documents, examining dealmaking in the sector and asking how PE investors understand the healthcare sector as a lucrative asset that they can subject to traditional PE investment strategies. In so doing, we illustrate how private equity both relies on old practices and reinvents itself as it seeks profits in the healthcare sector. Overall, we call for more attention to the effects of PE investment on the geographies and quality of healthcare.
American Academy of Nursing expert panel consensus statement on inequities in the juvenile justice system rooted in systemic and structural racism
2023, Nursing Outlook
The overrepresentation of youth of color has long been acknowledged and accepted in juvenile justice and legal systems. Many risk factors contribute to the detention and incarceration of youth; however, there is little evidence to explain how structural inequities and systemic racism add to that vulnerability. Historically, laws were passed to benefit the White society and resulted in outcomes that caused grave aftereffects for people of color and in some cases, ethnic minorities. Within the context of juvenile justice and the lens of critical race theory, the authors of this paper seek to illuminate selected historical educational, environmental, legal, and health care policies, practices, and decisions that led to their detrimental consequences. Recommendations for mitigating both intended (through law, funding, policies) and the unintended barriers as experienced by youth of color are presented.
Plastic and reconstructive surgeons’ views of a single payer health care system: Implications for patients and practice
2021, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
Citation Excerpt :
Responses to opinion questions were additionally stratified by practice type of the respondent (See Figures, Supplemental Digital Content 2–7). The advent of the American health care system and its core tenet of employer-based health insurance, is at least in part the product of the particularities of the American experience through the Great Depression and Second world war.7 Today, concerns about rising costs within the health care delivery apparatus, which accounts for approximately one sixth of the GDP,7 and the high number of uninsured Americans have prompted a debate about the limits of our current system.
Rising health care costs and the high number of uninsured Americans has led to the increasing popularity of a single payer alternative. While opinions of physicians at large have been studied, we present the first data examining the views of United States (U.S.) board-certified plastic surgeons on a single payer health care system and its implications for patients and practice.
A total of 3,431 US plastic and reconstructive surgeons were sent a 25-item Qualtrics survey and responses collected from September 1 to November 1, 2019. Independent variables included surgeon sociodemographic characteristics. The association between these and a preference for a single payer was evaluated using the logistic regression.
There was a 11% response rate (n = 383). The majority of respondents were in private practice (64.5%). Forty-four percent believed that it is the government's responsibility to ensure care is provided for all; 34% were willing to give up income in exchange for reduced paperwork and administrative burden. Sixty-three percent would not work the same number of hours under single payer. Private practice plastic surgeons were significantly less likely to favor single payer (95% CI: 0.19 and 0.76). Among academic plastic surgeons, 24% would consider leaving if single payer were enacted and 60% would decrease the reconstructive portion of their practice.
Most U.S. plastic and reconstructive surgeons do not support a single payer health care system. Its enactment could have sweeping implications for plastic surgeons nationwide, among the most significant being a shift from academic to private practice with a potential reduction in patient access to complex reconstructive procedures.
COVID-19, Obesity, and Structural Racism: Understanding the Past and Identifying Solutions for the Future
2021, Cell Metabolism
Citation Excerpt :
One is the establishment of employer-provided health insurance as the primary means to access high-quality healthcare. Employers began to offer health insurance as a benefit in response to labor shortages during World War II (Thomasson, 2002). This benefit was also non-taxable, making it the cheapest way to obtain insurance (Blumenthal, 2006).
Long-standing systemic inequalities—fueling unequal access to critical resources such as healthcare, housing, education, and employment opportunities—are largely responsible for the significant race disparities in obesity and COVID-19. Because of this legacy, public health emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately impact communities of color, exacerbated by high rates of pre-existing chronic diseases like obesity. Learning from this history is instructive for understanding our present situation and for crafting effective solutions that promote health equity. Critical action is needed now to meaningfully address the disproportionate impact of these major public health problems on Black and Brown populations.
Palliative space-time: Expanding and contracting geographies of US health care
2021, Social Science and Medicine
Citation Excerpt :
Welfare programs have always first served the worthy poor, a population seen by state and society as worthy of assistance, compared to other populations deemed lazy or otherwise unsympathetic, generally according to racialized and gendered norms (Garland, 2014; Piven and Cloward, 1993). Central to this categorizing, Piven and Cloward explain, is welfare's role in encouraging people into the workforce as the market demands through denials or granting of benefits, plus the role of employer-provided health insurance (Thomasson, 2002). Medicare and Medicaid are major parts of the welfare state apparatus.
Two important changes are happening in health care in the US. As hospitals close in high numbers, the geographies of health care services are changing. Also, the ageing of the population brings about new and complex care needs. These are not discrete trends, as ageing impacts the who, what, and where of care needs, and hospital closures remakes the geographies of where people overall access care. Developed out of research on the impacts of hospital restructuring on workers, patients, and communities, this paper aims to understand how health care financing, care needs for the ageing, and new geographies of health services are intertwined. To do so, I look back to 1980s policy changes to Medicare, the federal health insurance program for the elderly and disabled. In 1982, Congress made two important changes to Medicare. The program began covering hospice services, constituting an expansion of care, and the government drastically changed the way it reimburses providers, effectively a contraction of the program. I trace the impacts of these changes over the next decades through analysis of media coverage and secondary research on hospital budgets. Drawing on the concept of palliative space-time, I identify a contradictory logic of death at the center of this expansion and contraction of the health care system. This death logic works to destabilize an already uneven geography of health service. Yet, this crisis has the potential for more just geographies of health and care.
Escaping from the State? Historical Paths to Public and Private Insurance
2021, Enterprise and Society

View all citing articles on Scopus

^☆: Many thanks to Bill Collins, George Davis, Price Fishback, Gerald Friedman, Bart Wilson, and seminar participants at North Carolina State University for providing excellent comments and suggestions. This paper benefited tremendously from the comments of two anonymous referees. Financial support from NSF Grant SBR-9632121 and a grant from the University of Arizona are gratefully acknowledged. All errors are my responsibility.

^f1: [email protected]

View full text

Regular ArticleFrom Sickness to Health: The Twentieth-Century Development of U.S. Health Insurance☆

Abstract

Economics of Education Review