Skip to main content

Some Methods for Studying Cultural Cognitive Structures

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Culture, Mind and Society ((CMAS))

Abstract

Human cognition appears to involve two different kinds of cognitive structures. One kind of structure consists of the organization of a small number of elements into a gestalt that functions as a “chunk” in short term or working memory. Examples are objects like the human face, events like something falling down, relations like X happening before Y, and so on. Typically these cognitive chunks are symbolized in language by single words or short phrases and can be unpacked into the kinds of simple universal concepts or “primes” outlined by Wierzbicka (1996).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Campbell, Donald. 1986. Science’s social system of validity enhancing collective belief change and the problems of the social sciences. In Metatheory in social science, ed. D. Fiske and R. Shweder, pp. 108–135. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, Kenneth. 1943. The nature of explanation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrade, Roy G. 1976. A propositional analysis of U.S. American beliefs about illness. In Meanings in anthropology, ed. K. Basso and H. Selby, pp. 155–180. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrade, Roy G. 1987. The folk model of the mind. In Cultural models in language and thought, ed. D. Holland and N. Quinn, pp. 112–147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrade, Roy G. 1995. The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius, William V. 1999. Cultural variation in the development of folk theories of knowing. Proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynmann, Richard. 1985. QED: The strange theory of light and matter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, Dedre and Keith J. Holyoak. 1997. Reasoning and learning by analogy. American Psychologist 52:32–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, Thomas. 1970. East is A big bird. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G. 1965. Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, Edwin. 1980. Culture and inference. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, Angeline. 1998. Ethnopsychologies: cultural variations in theories of mind. Psychological Bulletin 123:1:3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linger, Daniel. 1992. Dangerous encounters. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, George. 1985. Cognitive psychology: An essay in cognitive science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, Margaret and Rhoda Metraux. 1953. Culture at a distance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish, Steven. 1991. The sacred mind: Newar cultural representations of mental life and the production of moral consciousness. Ethos 19:3:313–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Naomi. 1978. Do Mfantse fish sellers estimate probabilities in their heads? American Ethnologist 5:2:206–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Naomi. 1987. Convergent evidence for a cultural model of American marriage. In Cultural models in language and thought, ed. D. Holland and N. Quinn, pp. 173–192. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Naomi. 1992. The motivational force of self-understanding. In Human motives and cultural models, ed. R. D’Andrade and C. Strauss, pp. 90–126. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Naomi. 1997. Research on shared task solutions. In A Cognitive theory of cultural meaning, ed. C. Strauss and N. Quinn, pp. 137–188. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, Hans. 1938. Experience and prediction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, John M. 1964. The self-management of cultures. In Explorations in cultural anthropology: essays in honor of George Peter Murdock, ed. W. H. Goodenough, pp. 433–454. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney, A. Kimball, Susan C. Weiler, and William H. Batchelder. 1986. Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist 88:313–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel, Paula J., Fabricius, William V., Noyes, Caroline R., Bigler, Kelleigh D., and Alexander, Joyce M. 1994. The organization of mental verbs and folk theories of knowing. Journal of Memory and Language 33:376–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Claudia and Naomi Quinn. 1997. A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Anthony F. C. 1964. On being just complicated enough. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 17:458–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Susan C. and Roberta D. Baer. 2001. Intra-and intercultural variation in the definition of five illnesses: AIDS, diabetes, the common cold, empacho, and mal de ojo. Journal of Cross-Cultural Research 35:201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, Henry M. 1990. The child’s theory of mind. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics, primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Naomi Quinn

Copyright information

© 2005 Naomi Quinn

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D’Andrade, R. (2005). Some Methods for Studying Cultural Cognitive Structures. In: Quinn, N. (eds) Finding Culture in Talk. Culture, Mind and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05871-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics