Skip to main content

Abstract

The approach taken in this book to guide authors in assessing the evidence for their respective topic areas was generated by the editors. It represents a combination of current recommendations for describing the state of public health evidence, assessing the quality of that evidence, including the suitability of the various studies reviewed to assess the effectiveness of their respective interventions, along with a good dose of practicality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beck, C. T. (1993). Qualitative research: the evaluation of its credibility, fittingness, and auditability. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15(2), 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briss, P. A., Zaza, S., Pappaioanou, M., Fielding, J., Wright-De Agüero, L., Truman, B. I., et al. (2000). Developing an evidence-based guide to community preventive services-methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(Suppl. 1), 35–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). (2002). Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and non-randomized studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52, 377–387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2002). Qualitative data analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rychetnik, L., & Frommer, M. (2002). A schema for evaluating evidence on public health interventions V.4. National Public Health Partnership, University of Sydney, April 2002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Kennelly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer US

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kennelly, J. (2011). Methodological Approach to Assessing the Evidence. In: Handler, A., Kennelly, J., Peacock, N. (eds) Reducing Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Reproductive and Perinatal Outcomes. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1499-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1499-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1498-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1499-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics