Skip to main content

Nonpolypoid Colorectal Neoplasia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Virtual Colonoscopy

Abstract

Since Muto et al. reported the first “small flat adenoma” of the colon in 1985 [1], the importance of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia is increasingly being recognized. In the past, all colorectal cancers were assumed to arise slowly from polypoid adenomas through the adenoma–carcinoma sequence in combination with the accumulation of genetic alterations and environmental changes. However, it is now widely accepted that a substantial proportion of colorectal cancers are attributed to nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Muto T, Kamiya J, Sawada T, et al. Small “flat adenoma” of the large bowel with special reference to its clinicopathologic features. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28:847–851.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut. 2009;58:241–248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1207–1217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1403–1412.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2191–2200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA. 2009;301:2453–2461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, et al. Flat adenomas in the national polyp study: is there increased risk for high-grade dysplasia initially or during surveillance? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:905–911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I, et al. A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2543–2549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Park DH, Kim HS, Kim WH, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and malignant potential of colorectal flat neoplasia compared with that of polypoid neoplasia. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:43–49; discussion 49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet. 2000;355:1211–1214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saitoh Y, Waxman I, West AB, et al. Prevalence and distinctive biologic features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:1657–1665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA. 2008;299:1027–1035.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Participants in the Paris Workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:S3–S43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kudo S. Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. 1993;25:455–461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hurlstone DP, Sanders DS, Cross SS, et al. Colonoscopic resection of lateral spreading tumours: a prospective analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut. 2004;53:1334–1339.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oka S, et al. Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:62–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chiu HM, Lin JT, Chen CC, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm in an asymptomatic and average-risk Chinese population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:463–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E, et al. Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut. 2002;51:550–555.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Soetikno R, Friedland S, Kaltenbach T, et al. Nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:566–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dekker E, Fockens P. New imaging techniques at colonoscopy: tissue spectroscopy and narrow band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005;15:703–714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Larghi A, Lecca PG, Costamagna G. High-resolution narrow band imaging endoscopy. Gut. 2008;57:976–986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Paggi S, Radaelli F, Amato A, et al. The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:1049–1054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Song LM, Adler DG, Conway JD, et al. Narrow band imaging and multiband imaging. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:581–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fidler JL, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al. Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2002;27:292–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Park SH, Ha HK, Kim AY, et al. Flat polyps of the colon: detection with 16-MDCT colonography – preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1611–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Park SH, Kim SY, Lee SS, et al. Sensitivity of CT colonography for nonpolypoid colorectal lesions interpreted by human readers and with computer-aided detection. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Park SH, Lee SS, Choi EK, et al. Flat colorectal neoplasms: definition, importance, and visualization on CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:953–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gluecker TM, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ, et al. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method. Am J Roentgenol.2004;182:881–889.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Park SH, Ha HK, Kim MJ, et al. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions. Radiology. 2005;235:495–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, et al. Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1343–1347.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thomeer M, Carbone I, Bosmans H, et al. Stool tagging applied in thin-slice multidetector computed tomography colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27:132–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bertoni G, Sassatelli R, Conigliaro R, et al. Visual “disappearing phenomenon” can reliably predict the nonadenomatous nature of rectal and rectosigmoid diminutive polyps at endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:588–591.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fletcher JG, Booya F, Johnson CD, et al. CT colonography: unraveling the twists and turns. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2005;21:90–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Park SH, Yee J, Kim SH, et al. Fundamental elements for successful performance of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Korean J Radiol. 2007;8:264–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1300–1311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fidler J, Johnson C. Flat polyps of the colon: accuracy of detection by CT colonography and histologic significance. Abdom Imaging. 2009; 34(2):157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lostumbo A, Suzuki K, Dachman AH. Flat lesions in CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2009;doi: 10.1007/s00261-009-9562-3.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong Ho Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Park, S.H. (2011). Nonpolypoid Colorectal Neoplasia. In: Dachman, A., Laghi, A. (eds) Atlas of Virtual Colonoscopy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5852-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5852-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5851-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5852-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics