Skip to main content

Abstract

Osteoporosis as a generalized bone disease appears to affect the cervical spine differently from other spinal regions. Failure of the anterior column, i.e., vertebral body osteoporosis fractures, is typically seen in the thoracolumbar junction and the midthoracic region and is virtually unknown above the T4 level [1]. This may be related to biomechanical and histomorphological differences between the various spinal regions. Edmonston et al. [2] have shown for the thoracolumbar region up to the level T1 that vertebral body failure load strongly correlates with bone mineral density (BMD) and much less with vertebral dimensions. Biomechanical compressive tests, however, have shown that cervical spine segments may withstand considerable forces without apparent failure, even in old-aged specimens (P.A. Cripton, unpublished data). It may therefore be possible that force flows in the cervical spine differ from those in other spinal regions, such that the anterior column and thereby the vertebral bodies are less loaded. The different anatomical dimensions and relations between the anterior column and the posterior elements in the cervical spine may be a reflection of these force flows. The principal loading of the cervical spine results from dynamic rather than static processes as in the lumbar spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wasnich RD. Vertebral fracture epidemiology. Bone 1996;18:S179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Edmondston SJ, Singer KP, Day RE, Price RI, Breidahl PD. Ex vivo estimation of thoracolumbar vertebral body compressive strength: the relative contributions of bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry. Osteoporosis Int 1997;7:142–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaufmann M. Transpedikuläre Vertebroplastik zur Prophylaxe von Wirbelfrakturen bei schwerer Osteoporose. MD thesis, University of Bern, (submitted) 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Myers ER, Wilson SE. Biomechanics of osteoporosis and vertebral fracture. Spine 1997;22:25S-31S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ritzel H, Amling M, Pösl M, Hahn M, Delling GG. The thickness of human vertebral cortical bone and its changes in aging and osteoporosis: a histomorphometric analysis of the complete spinal column from thirty-seven autopsy specimens. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:89–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pintar FA, Yoganandan N, Voo L. Effect of age and loading rate on human cervical spine injury threshold. Spine 1998;23:1957–1962.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dvorak J, Antinnes JA, Panjabi MM, Loustalot D, Bonomo M. Age and gender related normal motion of the cervical spine. Spine 1992;17:S393–398.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bohlman HH, Anderson PA. Anterior decompression and arthrodesis of the cervical spine: long term improvement. II. Improvement in incomplete traumatic quadriparesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:671–682.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lieberman IH, Webb JK. Cervical spine injuries in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994;76:877–881.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aebi M, Nazarian S. Klassifikation der Halswirbelsäulenverletzungen. Orthopäde 1987;16:27–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kinoshita H, Hirakawa H. Pathological studies and pathological principles on the management of extension injuries of the cervical spine. Paraplegia 1989;27:172–181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryan MD, Henderson JJ. The epidemiology of fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. Injury 1992;23:38–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seybold EA, Bayley JC. Functional outcome of surgically and conservatively managed dens fractures. Spine 1998;23:1837–1846.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56:1663–1674.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanigan WC, Powell FC, Elwood PW, Henderson JP. Odontoid fractures in elderly patients. J Neurosurg 1993;78:32–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koch RA, Nickel VL. The halo vest: an evaluation of motion and forces across the neck. Spine 1978;3:103–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brooks AL, Jenkins EB. Atlanto-axial arthrodeses by the wedge compression method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:279–283.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiler SJ, Malek AM, Rossitch E. Cervical spine fractures in the elderly. Surg Neurol 1997;47:274–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fried LC. Atlanto-axial fracture dislocations: failure of posterior C1 to C2 fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1973;55:490–496.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Magerl F, Seemann P. Stable posterior fusion of the atlas and axis by transarticular screw fixation. In: Kehr P, Weidner A, editors. Cervical spine I, Strassbourg 1985. Wien: Springer, 1987:322–327.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Grob D, Crisco JJ, Panjabi MM, Wang P, Dvorak J. Biomechanical evaluation of four different posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques. Spine 1992;17:480–490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weidner A. Application of the posterior interfacet screw for atlantoaxial pathology. In: Fessler RG, Haid RW, editors. Current techniques in spinal stabilization, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996:93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Aebi M, Etter C, Coscia M. Fractures of the odontoid process: treatment with anterior screw fixation. Spine 1989;14:1065–1070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Berlemann U, Schwarzenbach O. Dens fractures in the elderly: results of anterior screw fixation in 19 elderly patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1997;68:319–324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Clark CR, White AA. Fractures of the dens: a multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:1340–1348.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pepin JW, Bourne RB, Hawkins RJ. Odontoid fracture, with special reference to the elderly patient. Clin Orthop 1985;193:178–183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Amling M, Wening VJ, Pösl M, Grote HJ, Hahn M, Delling G. Die Struktur des Axis-Schlüssel zur Ätiologie der Densfraktur. Chirurgie 1994;65: 964–969.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K, Fujimura Y, Satomi K. Spontaneous fracture of the odontoid process in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine 1992;17:436–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chiba K, Fujimura Y, Toyama Y, Fujii E, Nakanishi T, Hirabayashi K. Treatment protocol for fractures of the odontoid process. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:267–276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schatzker J, Rorabeck CH, Waddell JP. Fractures of the dens: an analysis of thirty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1971;53:392–405.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berlemann, U., Heini, P.F. (2000). Cervical Spine Fractures and Osteoporosis. In: Obrant, K. (eds) Management of Fractures in Severely Osteoporotic Bone. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3825-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3825-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-855-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3825-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics