Skip to main content

Ethnobotany for Sustainable Ecosystem Management: A Regional Perspective in the Tehuacán Valley

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Ethnobiology ((EBL))

Abstract

Different indicators of global change identify that industrial processes are principal causes of the severe human impact on ecosystems of Earth. However, although industrial processes predominate in the world, numerous rural societies with a different rationality and organization coexist with the hegemonic mode of production. In indigenous communities the traditional botanical, zoological and ecological knowledge as well as traditional technologies of local resources and ecosystem management are particularly rich, as product of hundreds or thousands of years of experience. Indigenous communities have historically built diverse forms of managing the socioecological systems and the biocultural diversity adapted to local conditions, which are generally much more environmental friendly than other intensive forms of management. In this study we document the management of plant resources by peoples of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. We have inventoried more than 1600 plant species used for satisfying a broad spectrum of needs. People gather nearly 90 % of those species from wild populations, but practice different forms of incipient management (tolerance, enhancing, transplantation and seed sowing) in order to increase availability of nearly 400 important plant resources. The indigenous communities may adopt some modern techniques of managing resources and ecosystems, and select those according with their conditions and views. Based on these processes people construct hybrid techniques that may be adapted to the local environments. Agroecologists and ethnobotanists have visualized the high value of traditional management systems for generating technological viable alternatives for designing forms of sustainable management adapted to satisfy local needs and conserving biodiversity and ecosystems, and the continuous innovation tested by local people. It has been recognized that, in general, the traditional management systems have higher capacity for conserving biodiversity and ensuring the resilience of socioecological systems than industrial systems and that both traditional and modern techniques may contribute to better forms of management, but the form that the process adopts is crucial. Understanding traditional management systems are therefore the opportunity to reproduce valuable experiences, models and lessons for sustainable management and participatory adoption of new techniques may help to solve problems not traditionally solved. This chapter shows a general panorama of ethnobotanical information about resources and local traditional management strategies among Nahua, Mixtec, Mazatec, Cuicatec, Popoloca, Ixcatec and Mestizo peoples of the Tehuacán Valley, in order to analyse their role in designing a future for the region based on sustainability, an experience that may be useful for this and other regions of Mexico.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnosky AD, Hadly EA, Bascompte J, Berlow EL, Brown JH, Fortelius M, Getz WM, Harte J, Hastings A, Marquet PA, Martinez ND, Mooers A, Roopnarine P, Vermeij G, Williams JW, Gillespie R, Kitzes J, Marshall C, Matzke N, Mindell DP, Revilla E, Smith AB. Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature. 2012;486:52–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change. The physical science basis. Working Group I Fifth Assessment Report. WHO, UNEP, Nueva York; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kleijn D, Kohler F, Báldi A, Batáry P, Concepción E, Clough Y, Díaz M, Gabriel D, Holzschuh A, Knop E, Kovács A, Marshall E, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J. On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. Proc Royal Soc. 2009;276:903–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK. Global consequences of land use. Science. 2005;309:570–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Bhagwat SA, Buchori D, Faust H, Hertel D, Hölscher D, Juhrbandt J, Kessler M, Perfecto I, Scherber C, Schroth G, Veldkamp E, Wanger TC. Multi-functional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes—a review. J Appl Ecol. 2011;48:619–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Whitbread A. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv. 2012;151:53–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geiger F, De Snoo GR, Berendse F, Guerrero I, Morales MB, Onate JJ, Eggers S, Pärt T, Bommarco R, Bengtsson L, Clement LW, Weisser WW, Olszewski A, Ceryngier P, Hawro V, Inchausti P, Fischer C, Flohre A, Thies C, Tscharntke T. Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic Appl Ecol. 2010;11:97–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Altieri M, Toledo VM. The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. J Peasant Stud. 2011;38(3):587–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perfecto I, Vandermeer J. Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1134:173–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Horlings LG, Marsden TK. Towards the real green revolution? Exploring the conceptual dimensions of a new ecological modernization of agriculture that could ‘feed the world’. Glob Environ Chang. 2011;21(2):441–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chappell MJ, LaValle LA. Food security and biodiversity: can we have both? Agric Human Values. 2011;28:3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl. 2000;10(5):1251–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Toledo VM. Ethnoecology: a conceptual framework for the study of indigenous knowledge of nature. In: Stepp JR, Wybdgan FS, Zager RK, editors. Ethnobiology and biocultural diversity. Georgia: International Society of Ethnobiology; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ostrom E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Blancas J, Casas A, Pérez-Salicrup D, Caballero J, Vega E. Ecological and socio-cultural factors influencing plant management in Nahuatl communities of the Tehuacan Valley, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9(1):39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Darwin C. On the origin of the species by means of natural selection. London: John Murray; 1859.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harlan JR. Crops and man. Madison: American Society of Agronomy; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Casas A, Caballero J, Mapes C, Zárate S. Manejo de la vegetación, domesticación de plantas y origen de la agricultura en Mesoamérica. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México. 1997;61:31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Terrell JE, Hart JP, Barut S, Cellinese N, Curet A, Denham T, Kusimba CM, Latinis K, Oka R, Palka J, Pohl MED, Pope KO, Williams PR, Haines H, Staller JE. Domesticated landscapes: the subsistence ecology of plant and animal domestication. J Archaeol Method Theory. 2003;10(4):323–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parra F, Blancas J, Casas A. Landscape management and domestication of Stenocereus pruinosus (Cactaceae) in the Tehuacán Valley: human guided selection and gene flow. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012;8:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Valiente-Banuet A, Solís L, Dávila P, Arizmendi MC, Silva C, Ortega-Ramírez J, Treviño J, Rangel-Landa S, Casas A. Guía de la vegetación del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán. México: UNAM/CONABIO; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moreno-Calles AI, Casas A, Blancas J, Torres I, Masera O, Caballero J, García-Barrios L, Pérez-Negrón E, Rangel-Landa S. Agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation in arid zones: The case of the Tehuacan Valley, Central Mexico. Agroforest Syst. 2010;80:315–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Blancas J, Casas A, Rangel-Landa S, Moreno-Calles AI, Torres I, Pérez-Negrón E, Solís L, Delgado-Lemus A, Parra F, Arellanes Y, Caballero J, Cortés L, Lira R, Dávila P. Plant management in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico. Econ Bot. 2010;64:287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Larios C, Casas A, Vallejo M, Moreno-Calles AI, Blancas J. Plant management and biodiversity conservation in Náhuatl homegardens of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. J Ethnbiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vallejo M, Casas A, Blancas J, Moreno-Calles AI, Solís L, Rangel-Landa S, Dávila P, Téllez O. Agroforestry systems in the highlands of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico: indigenous cultures and biodiversity conservation. Agroforest Syst. 2013;88(1):125–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Arizmendi MC, Valiente-Banuet A. Guía de las aves del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán. México: UNAM/Fundación Cuicatlán; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dávila P, Arizmendi MC, Valiente-Banuet A, Villaseñor JL, Casas A, Lira R. Biological diversity in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, México. Biodivers Conserv. 2002;11:421–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Casas A, Valiente-Banuet A, Viveros JL, Dávila P, Lira R, Caballero J, Cortés L, Rodríguez I. Plant resources of the Tehuacán Valley, México. Econ Bot. 2001;55(1):129–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lira R, Casas A, Rosas-López R, Paredes-Flores M, Rangel-Landa S, Solís L, Torres I, Dávila P. Traditional knowledge and useful plant richness in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, México. Econ Bot. 2009;63:271–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Caballero J, Casas A, Cortés L, Mapes C. Patrones en el conocimiento, uso y manejo de plantas en pueblos indígenas de México. Estudios Atacameños. 1998;16:181–96.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Casas A, Rangel-Landa S, Torres I, Peréz-Negrón E, Solís L, Parra F, Blancas J, Farfán-Heredia B, Moreno-Calles AI. In situ management and conservation of plant resources in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, México: an ethnobotanical and ecological approach. In: De Albuquerque UP, Alves-Ramos M, editors. Current topics in ethnobotany. Kerala: Research Signpost; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pérez-Negrón E, Casas A. Use, extraction rates and spatial availability of plant resources in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico: the case of Santiago Quiotepec, Oaxaca. J Arid Environ. 2007;70(2):356–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Arellanes Y, Casas A, Arellanes A, Vega E, Blancas J, Vallejo M, Torres I, Rangel-Landa S, Moreno-Calles AI, Solís L, Pérez-Negrón E. Influence of traditional markets on plant management in the Tehuacan Valley. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9(1):38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Torres I, Casas A, Delgado-Lemus A, Rangel-Landa S. Aprovechamiento, demografía y establecimiento de Agave potatorum en el Valle de Tehuacán, México: aportes etnobiológicos y ecológicos para su manejo sustentable. Zonas Áridas. 2013;15(1):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Delgado-Lemus A, Torres I, Blancas J, Casas A. Vulnerability and risk management of Agave speces in the Tehuacán Valley Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10:53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. MacNeish RS. A summary of subsistence. In: Byers DS, editor. The prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley: environment and subsistence, vol. 1. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Smith EC. Plant remains. In: Byers DS, editor. The prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley: environment and subsistence, vol. 1. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Casas A, Vázquez MC, Viveros JL, Caballero J. Plant management among the Nahua and the Mixtec of the Balsas river basin: an ethnobotanical approach to the study of plant domestication. Hum Ecol. 1996;24(4):455–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Casas A, Otero-Arnaiz A, Peréz-Negrón E, Valiente-Banuet A. In situ management and Domestication of Plants in Mesoamerica. Ann Bot. 2007;100:1101–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Moreno-Calles AI, Casas A, García-Frapolli E, Torres I. Traditional agroforestry systems of multi-crop “milpa” and “chichipera” cactus forest in the arid Tehuacan Valley Mexico: their management and role in people’s subsistence. Agroforest Syst. 2012;84:207–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vallejo M, Casas A, Moreno-Calles AI, Blancas J. Los sistemas agroforestales del Valle de Tehuacán: una perspectiva regional. In: Moreno-Calles AI, editor. Los sistemas agroforestales de México. Morelia: UNAM. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Farfán-Heredia B. Efecto del manejo silvícola en la estructura y dinámica poblacional de Polaskia chichipe Backeberg en el Valle de Tehuacán Cuicatlán. M.Sc. thesis, CIEco, UNAM, Morelia, Michoacán. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hernández JS, Rodero E, Herrera M, Delgado JV, Barba C, Sierra A. La caprinocultura en la Mixteca poblana (México) descripción e identificación de factores limitantes. Archivos de Zootecnia. 2001;50:231–9.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rangel Landa S, Lemus R. Aspectos etnobotánicos y ecológicos de los recursos vegetales entre los Ixcatecos de Santa María Ixcatlán, Oaxaca. B.Sc. thesis, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, Michoacán. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Solís L. Etnoecología cuicateca: recursos bióticos y subsistencia campesina. M.Sc. thesis, Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacán. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Torres I. Aspectos etnobotánicos y ecológicos de los recursos vegetales en la comunidad de San Luis Atolotitlán, municipio de Caltepec, Puebla, México. B.Sc. thesis, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, Michoacán. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Khurana E, Singh JS. Ecology of tree seed and seedlings: implications for tropical forest conservation and restoration. Curr Sci. 2001;80:748–57.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Baraza E, Valiente-Banuet A. Seed dispersal by domestic goats in a semiarid thornscrub of Mexico. J Arid Environ. 2008;72:1973–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Martorell C, Peters ED. The measurement of chronic disturbance and its effects on the threatened cactus Mammillaria pectinifera. Biol Conserv. 2005;124:199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Torres I, Casas A, Vega E, Martínez-Ramos M, Delgado-Lemus A. Population dynamics and sustainable management of mescal agaves in central Mexico: Agave potatorum in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley. Econ Bot. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Estrella-Ruíz P. Efecto de la explotación humana en la biología de la polinización de Agave salmiana y Agave potatorum en el Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán. M.Sc. thesis, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM, México. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rangel-Landa S, Dávila P, Casas A. Establishment of Agave potatorum: an ecological approach for developing assisted populations’ recovery. J Arid Environ. 2014;10:53.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ghilardi A, Guerrero G, Masera O. Spatial analysis of residential fuelwood supply and demand patterns in Mexico using the WISDOM approach. Biomass Bioenergy. 2007;31:475–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Echeverría Y. Aspectos etnobotánicos y ecológicos de los recursos vegetales en las comunidades mixtecas de San Pedro Nodón y San Pedro Jocotipac, Oaxaca, México. B.Sc. thesis, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, Michoacán. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Delgado-Lemus AM. Aprovechamiento y disponibilidad espacial de Agave potatorum en San Luis Atolotitlán, Puebla, México. M.Sc. thesis, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, Michoacán. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  57. SEMARNAT. Programa de Manejo Reserva de la Biosfera Tehuacán-Cuicatlán. México. Disponible en www.conanp.gob.mx. México; 2013.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank PAPIIT, DGAPA, UNAM (projects IN205111-3 e IN209214) and CONACYT (proyecto CB-2008-01-103551 and CB-2013-01-221800) for financial support. We especially thank the generosity of people of the communities where we have conducted our studies, who kindly have shared their knowledge and experiences and have invited us to form part of their team for sustainable management of resources and ecosystems. We also thank our friends from Grupo de Estudios Ambientales GEA a civil organization the possibility of interact and make more satisfactory our researches.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Casas Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Casas, A. et al. (2016). Ethnobotany for Sustainable Ecosystem Management: A Regional Perspective in the Tehuacán Valley. In: Lira, R., Casas, A., Blancas, J. (eds) Ethnobotany of Mexico. Ethnobiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6669-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics