Skip to main content

When is a Little Information a Dangerous Thing? Coping with Stressful Events by Monitoring Versus Blunting

  • Chapter
Coping and Health

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((HF,volume 12))

Abstract

Consider two individuals, both of whom must undergo an aversive dental procedure. When the first individual arrives, the dentist describes what is going to take place, including when and under what circumstances the person can expect to feel pain. The second individual receives no such preparation from the dentist. Exactly the same procedure is performed on both individuals. Will the person undergoing the predictable procedure experience more or less stress before, during, and after his dental visit than the person undergoing the identical, but unpredictable procedure?

I thank E. Freed, R. Grant, J. Harkavy, M. Hammel, C. Mangan, H. Lief, W. Miller, J. Nelson, and M. Seligman for their help and advice. Partially supported by Grant RR-09069 from the National Institute of Health and Grant MH-19604 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrew, J. M., 1970, Recovery from surgery, with and without preparatory instruction, for three coping styles, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 15:223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. R., O’Brien, L., and DeWitt, G. W., 1977, The influence of response effectiveness on the preference for warning and on psychophysiological stress reactions, J. Personal., 45:395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. R., and Rosenn, M., 1972, Vigilant and nonvigilant coping strategies and psychophysiological stress reactions during the anticipation of an electric shock, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 23:128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badia, P., McBane, B., Suter, S., and Lewis, P., 1966, Preference behavior in an immediate versus variably delayed shock situation with and without a warning signal, J. Exp. Psychol., 72:847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badia, P., Suter, S., and Lewis, P., 1967, Preference for warned shock: Information and/or preparation, Psychol. Rep., 20:271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, T. X., and Hahn, K. W., 1962, Physiological and subjective responses to pain producing stimulation under hypnotically-suggested and waking-imagined “analgesia.” J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 65:411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E., 1960, “Conflict Arousal and Curiosity,” Mc Graw Hill, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blitz, B., and Dinnerstein, A. J., 1971, Role of attentional focus in pain perception: Manipulation of response to noxious stimulation by instructions, J. Abnorm. Psychol., 77:42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. J., Houston, B. K., Holmes, D. S., and Burish, T. G., 1977, The effectiveness of attentional diversion and situation redefinition for reducing stress to a nonambiguous threat, J. Res. Personal., 11:83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D., 1961, The repression-sensitization scale: Rationale, reliability, and validity, J. Personal., 29:334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, F., and Lazarus, R. S., 1973, Active coping processes, coping dispositions, and recovery from surgery, Psychosom. Med., 35:375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egbert, L. D., Battit, G. E., Welch, C. E., and Bartlett, M. K., 1974, Reduction of the operative pain by encouragement and instruction of patient: Study of doctor-patient rapport, N.E. J. Med., 270–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R., 1966, Effects of uncertainty about the nature and advent of a noxious stimulus (shock) upon heart rate, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 3:353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., and Maisel, E., 1972, Evaluating the effects of the prediction-control confound, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 23:314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M. J.,1959, The relationship between coping and avoiding behavior and response to fear-arousing propaganda, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 58:247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, D. S., and Houston, B. K., 1974, Effectiveness of situation redefinition and affective isolation in coping with stress, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 29:212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. O., 1958, “psychological Stress,” John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. E., and Leventhal, H., 1974, Effects of accurate expectations and behavioral instructions on reactions during a noxious medical examination, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 29:710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., Bentler, P. M., and Petry, G., 1966, The reduction of uncertainty concerning future pain, J. Abnorm. Psychol 71:87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, D. G., 1972, Differential responsiveness of two electrodermal indices to psychological stress and performance of a complex cognitive task, Psychophysiology 9:218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klemp, G. O., and Rodin, J., 1976, Effects of uncertainty, delay, and focus of attention on reactions to an aversive situation, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 12:416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. S., Janis, I. L., and Wolfer, J. A., 1975, Reduction of psychological stress in surgical patients, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 11:155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., and Alfert, E., 1964, Short-circuiting of threat by experimentally altering cognitive appraisal, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 69:195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., Opton, E. M., Nomikos, M. S., and Rankin, N. O., 1965, The principle of short-circuiting of threat: Further evidence, J. Personal., 33:622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D. T., 1962, Perception in the rat: Autonomic response to shock as a function of length of warning interval, Science 137:665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maltzman, P. O., and Wolff, C., 1970, Preference for immediate vs. delayed noxious stimulation and the concomitant G.S.R., J. Exp. Psychol., 83:76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, P. G., 1970, The effect of orientation passages on patient stress prior to dentistry, Psychol. Rec., 20:479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., 1979a, Controllability and human stress: Method evidence, and theory, Behay. Res. Ther., 17:287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., 1979b, in press, Why having control reduces stress: If I can stop the roller coaster I don’t want to get off, in: “Human Helplessness: Theory and Research,” M. Seligman and J. Garber eds., Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., 1979c, in press, Coping with impending stress: Psychophysiological and cognitive correlates of choice, Psychophysiology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., 1979, unpublished manuscript, Monitors vs. blunters: Validation of a questionnaire to assess two styles for coping with threat, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., and Grant, R. P., 1979, in press, The blunting hypothesis: A theory of predictability and human stress, in: “Trends in Behavior Therapy,” P. O. Sjoden and S. Bates eds., Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., and Grant, R. P., 1978, unpublished manuscript, Predictability and human stress: Evidence theory, and conceptual clarification, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., and Harkavy, J., 1979a, unpublished manuscript, Coping with psychological threat by monitoring vs. blunting, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., and Harkavy, J., 1979b, unpublished manuscript, Monitoring vs. blunting and amount of stress-relevant information processing, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., Grant, R. P., and Nelson, J., 1978, unpublished manuscript, Choice of potential control under threat of electric shock, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., Mangan, C. E., Freed, E., and Burtnett, M., 1979, unpublished manuscript, Which patients benefit from information before a gynecological procedure?: When the doctor should tell all, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., 1974, Processes in delay of gratification, in: “Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,” Vol. 7, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E. B., and Zeiss, A. R., 1973, Selective attention to the self: Situational and dispositional determinants, J. Personal Soc. Psychol., 27:129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E. B., and Zeiss, A. R., 1976, Determinants of selective memory about the self, J. Consul. Clin. Psychol., 46:92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monat, A., 1976, Temporal uncertainty, anticipation time, and cognitive coping under threat, J. Hum. Stress 2:32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monat, A., Averill, J. R., and Lazarus, R. S., 1972, Anticipatory stress and coping reactions under various conditions of uncertainty, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 24:237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, R. J., 1970, The effect of experimentally altered cognitive appraisal on pain tolerance, Psychonom. Sci., 20:106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, C. C., Jr., 1955, The stimulus conditions which follow learned responses, Psychol. Rev., 62:341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M., and Mellinger, M., 1972, Attention and responsivity to remote dangers: A laboratory simulation for assessing reactions to threatening events, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 24:132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., 1968, Chronic fear produced by unpredictable electric shock, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 66:402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., and Binik, Y. M., 1977, The safety signal hypothesis, in: “Pavolvian-Operant Interactions,” H. Davis and H. Hurwitz eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sime, A. M., 1976, Relationship of preoperative fear, type of coping, and information received about surgery to recovery from surgery, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 34:716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speisman, J., Lazarus, R., Mordkoff, A., and Davison, L., 1964, Experimental reduction of stress based on ego-defense theory, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 68:367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillant, G. E., 1977, “Adaptation to Life,” Little, Brown & Co., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, D. T. A., 1971, Information seeking in a natural stress situation, J. App. Psychol., 55:359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, D. T. A., and Bigelow, D. A., 1974, Effect of information about a potentially stressful situation on responses to stress impact, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 29:50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, P. L., 1969, Anxiety, attention, and coping with threat, J. Abnorm. Psychol., 73:137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. G. L., Jones J. R., Workhoven, M. N., and Williams, B., 1975, The psychological control of preoperative anxiety, Psychophysiology, 12:50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, S.M. (1980). When is a Little Information a Dangerous Thing? Coping with Stressful Events by Monitoring Versus Blunting. In: Levine, S., Ursin, H. (eds) Coping and Health. NATO Conference Series, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1042-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1042-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-1044-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-1042-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics