Skip to main content

Spheno-Orbital Meningiomas: When the Endoscopic Approach Is Better

  • Conference paper
Trends in Reconstructive Neurosurgery

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 124))

Abstract

Spheno-orbital meningiomas were historically treated by traditional craniotomies. However, in the past few years new endoscopic treatments have been successfully performed. In this study, we analyzed different indications for craniotomy and endoscopy, and the advantages and disadvantages of these procedures.

Thirty patients with spheno-orbital meningiomas were operated on over 2 years, between 2013 and 2014. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed in all patients preoperatively. Navigated surgical removal and histological confirmation, as well as follow-up examinations, including CT scan at 24 h and MRI at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, were performed. Twenty-three patients were treated by traditional fronto-temporal, fronto-temporo-orbital, and supraorbital craniotomies; in six cases the tumor was removed via endoscopic endonasal and lateral transorbital resection. Only one case required a combined supraorbital and endoscopic endonasal approach.

We analyzed the results of the different surgical techniques, in particular those of the endoscopic approaches.

In selected cases, the endoscopic approach to spheno-orbital meningiomas, compared with traditional approaches, may be more effective in removing tumors completely. The surgical technique is easy and the rate of complications is low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alqahtani A, Padoan G, Segnini G, Lepera D, Fortunato S, Dallan I, Pistochini A, Abdulrahman S, Abbate V, Hirt B, Castelnuovo P (2015) Transorbital transnasal endoscopic combined approach to the anterior and middle skull base: a laboratory investigation. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 35(3):173–179

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bikmaz K, Mrak R, Al-Mefty O (2007) Management of bone-invasive, hyperostotic sphenoid wing meningiomas. J Neurosurg 107(5):905–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cannon PS, Rutherford SA, Richardson PL, King A, Leatherbarrow B (2009) The surgical management and outcomes for spheno-orbital meningiomas: a 7-year review of multi-disciplinary practice. Orbit 28(6):371–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carrizo A, Basso A (1998) Current surgical treatment for sphenoorbital meningiomas. Surg Neurol 50:574–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Civit T, Freppel S (2010) Sphenoorbital meningiomas. Neurochirurgie 56(2–3):124–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dallan I, Castelnuovo P, Locatelli D, Turri-Zanoni M, AlQahtani A, Battaglia P, Hirt B, Sellari-Franceschini S (2015) Multiportal combined transorbital transnasal endoscopic approach for the management of selected skull base lesions: preliminary experience. World Neurosurg 84(1):97–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Jesús O, Toledo MM (2001) Surgical management of meningioma en plaque of the sphenoid ridge. Surg Neurol 55:265–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forster MT, Daneshvar K, Senft C, Seifert V, Marquardt G (2014) Sphenoorbital meningiomas: surgical management and outcome. Neurol Res 36(8):695–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grassi P, Strianese D, Mariniello G, Bonavolontà G (2015) Delayed recovery of visual acuity after sphenoorbital meningioma surgical removal: case report and review of the literature. Is visual acuity recovery possible after an initial decline? J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 76(4):328–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Honeybul S, Neil-Dwyer G, Lang DA, Evans BT, Ellison DW (2001) Sphenoid wing meningioma en plaque: a clinical review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:749–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Luetjens G, Krauss JK, Brandis A, Nakamura M (2011) Bilateral sphenoorbital hyperostotic meningiomas with proptosis and visual impairment: a therapeutic challenge. Report of three patients and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 113(10):859–863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Norris JL, Cleasby GW (1981) Endoscopic orbital surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 91(2):249–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Norris JL, Cleasby GW, Nakanishi AS, Martin LJ (1981) Intraocular endoscopic surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 91(5):603–606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oya S, Sade B, Lee JH (2011) Sphenoorbital meningioma: surgical technique and outcome. J Neurosurg 114(5):1241–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pieper DR, Al-Mefty O, Hanada Y, Buechner D (1999) Hyperostosis associated with meningioma of the cranial base: secondary changes or tumor invasion. Neurosurgery 44:742–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pompili A, Derome PJ, Visot A, Guiot G (1982) Hyperostosing meningiomas of the sphenoid ridge–clinical features, surgical therapy, and long-term observations: review of 49 cases. Surg Neurol 17:411–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ringel F, Cedzich C, Schramm J (2007) Microsurgical technique and results of a series of 63 spheno-orbital meningiomas. Neurosurgery 60:214–221

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roser F, Nakamura M, Jacobs C, Vorkapic P, Samii M (2005) Sphenoid wing meningiomas with osseous involvement. Surg Neurol 64:37–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saeed P, van Furth WR, Tanck M, Kooremans F, Freling N, Streekstra GI, Regensburg NI, van der Sprenkel JW, Peerdeman SM, van Overbeeke JJ, Mourits MP (2011) Natural history of spheno-orbital meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153(2):395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saeed P, van Furth WR, Tanck M, Freling N, van der Sprenkel JW, Stalpers LJ, van Overbeeke JJ, Mourits MP (2011) Surgical treatment of sphenoorbital meningiomas. Br J Ophthalmol 95(7):996–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sandalcioglu IE, Gasser T, Mohr C, Stolke D, Wiedemayer H (2005) Spheno-orbital meningiomas: interdisciplinary surgical approach, resectability and long-term results. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 33:260–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scarone P, Leclerq D, Heran F, Robert G (2009) Long-term results with exophthalmos in a surgical series of 30 sphenoorbital meningiomas. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 111:1069–1077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schick U, Bleyen J, Bani A, Hassler W (2006) Management of meningiomas en plaque of the sphenoid wing. J Neurosurg 104:208–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shrivastava RK, Sen C, Costantino PD, Della RR (2005) Sphenoorbital meningiomas: surgical limitations and lessons learned in their long-term management. J Neurosurg 103:491–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Solmaz I, Tehli O, Temiz C, Kural C, Hodaj I, Kutlay M, Gonul E, Daneyemez MK (2014) Surgical strategies for the removal of sphenoorbital meningiomas. Turk Neurosurg 24(6):859–866

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Peron .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peron, S., Cividini, A., Santi, L., Galante, N., Castelnuovo, P., Locatelli, D. (2017). Spheno-Orbital Meningiomas: When the Endoscopic Approach Is Better. In: Visocchi, M., Mehdorn, H.M., Katayama, Y., von Wild, K.R.H. (eds) Trends in Reconstructive Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 124. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39546-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39546-3_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39545-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39546-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics