Skip to main content

Surgical Strategies for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 182))

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the surgical strategies for adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus, gastric cardia, and subcardial gastric cancer invading the cardia ± distal esophagus known as adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). The different surgical approaches according to the tumor origin, localization, and tumor stage are addressed with particular attention to the extent and type of resection and appropriate lymphadenectomy (LAD). The classification of AEG according to Siewert is helpful for the selection of the surgical strategy. While type I tumors benefit from a transthoracic en bloc esophagectomy including a two-field LAD, type II and III tumors can be treated by an extended total gastrectomy with a transhiatal resection of the distal esophagus and LAD of the lower mediastinum and the abdominal D2 compartment. Limited resections appear to be ­possible for early tumor stages in selected cases of type I–III tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aikou T, Shimazu H (1989) Difference in main lymphatic pathways from the lower esophagus and gastric cardia. Jpn J Surg 19(3):290–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aikou T, Higashi H, Natsugoe S et al (2001) Can sentinel node navigation surgery reduce the extent of lymph node dissection in gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 8(9 suppl):90S–93S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C et al (2002) Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 236(2):177–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels H, Stein HJ, Siewert JR (1998) Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 85(6):840–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD et al (2006) Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 82(2):402–406; discussion 406–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Bo T, Zhihong P, Peiwu Y et al (2009) General complications following laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy and analysis of techniques to manage them. Surg Endosc 23:1860–1865

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollschweiler E, Baldus SE, Schroder W et al (2006) High rate of lymph-node metastasis in submucosal esophageal squamous-cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas. Endoscopy 38(2):149–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M et al (1999) Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 340(12):908–914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burian M, Stein HJ, Sendler A et al (2004) Sentinel node detection in Barrett’s and cardia cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 11(3 Suppl):255S–258S

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cense HA, Visser MR, van Sandick JW et al (2004) Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement. J Surg Oncol 88(1):32–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Journo XB, Doddoli C, Michelet P et al (2005) Transthoracic esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus: standard versus extended two-field mediastinal lymphadenectomy? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27(4):697–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Journo XB, Ferraro P, Martin J et al (2009) Barrett’s esophagus in the esophageal remnant: a critical long-term complication of subtotal esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 16(5):1429; author reply 1430–1431

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresner SM, Griffin SM (2000) Pattern of recurrence following radical oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg 87(10):1426–1433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ell C, May A, Gossner L et al (2000) Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 118(4):670–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feith M, Stein HJ, Siewert JR (2006) Adenocar­cinoma of the esophagogastric junction: surgical therapy based on 1602 consecutive resected patients. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 15(4):751–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gall FP, Hermanek P (1985) New aspects in the surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma–a comparative study of 1636 patients operated on between 1969 and 1982. Eur J Surg Oncol 11(3):219–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith JP, Sue-Ling HM, Martin I et al (1995) Preservation of the spleen improves survival after radical surgery for gastric cancer. Gut 36(5):684–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter W, Correa AM, Bekele N et al (2007) Proposed modification of nodal status in AJCC esophageal cancer staging system. Ann Thorac Surg 84(2):365–373; discussion 374–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Holscher AH, Bollschweiler E, Schneider PM et al (1997) Early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oeso­phagus. Br J Surg 84(10):1470–1473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holscher AH, Schroder W, Bollschweiler E et al (2003) [How safe is high intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy?]. Chirurg 74(8):726–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Holscher AH, Schneider PM, Gutschow C et al (2007) Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Ann Surg 245(2):241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, Tijssen JG et al (2000) The recurrence pattern of esophageal carcinoma after transhiatal resection. J Am Coll Surg 191(2):143–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG et al (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347(21):1662–1669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katai H, Sano T, Fukagawa T et al (2003) Prospective study of proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg 90(7):850–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa Y, Kitano S, Kubota T et al (2005a) Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer–toward a confluence of two major streams: a review. Gastric Cancer 8(2):103–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Mukai M et al (2005b) Sentinel lymph node mapping in esophageal and gastric cancer. Cancer Treat Res 127:123–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kitajima M, Kitagawa Y, Fujii H et al (2005) Credentialing of nuclear medicine physicians, surgeons, and pathologists as a multidisciplinary team for selective sentinel lymphadenectomy. Cancer Treat Res 127:253–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulig J, Popiela T, Kolodziejczyk P et al (2007) Standard D2 versus extended D2 (D2+) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: an interim safety analysis of a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial. Am J Surg 193(1):10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lauren PA, Nevalainen TJ (1993) Epidemiology of intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma. A time-trend study in Finland with comparison between studies from high- and low-risk areas. Cancer 71(10):2926–2933

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J et al (2004) Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg 240(6):962–972; discussion 972–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama K, Gunven P, Okabayashi K et al (1989) Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer. General pattern in 1931 patients. Ann Surg 210(5):596–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merendino KA, Dillard DH (1955) The concept of sphincter substitution by an interposed jejunal segment for anatomic and physiologic abnormalities at the esophagogastric junction; with special reference to reflux esophagitis, cardiospasm and esophageal varices. Ann Surg 142(3):486–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Motoyama S, Saito R, Okuyama M et al (2006) Treating gastric tube cancer with distal gastrectomy preserving the gastroepiploic artery. Ann Thorac Surg 81(2):751–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima M, Kato H, Miyazaki T et al (2007) Comprehensive investigations of quality of life after esophagectomy with special reference to the route of reconstruction. Hepatogastroenterology 54(73):104–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR et al (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 248(6):1081–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nishihira T, Hirayama K, Mori S (1998) A prospective randomized trial of extended cervical and superior mediastinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Am J Surg 175(1):47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Omloo JM, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JB et al (2007) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 246(6):992–1000; discussion 1000–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa S, Ando N, Kitagawa Y et al (1998) [Does incidence of carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction increase?]. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 99(9):542–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Pech O, Ell C (2009) Endoscopic therapy of Barrett’s esophagus. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 25:405–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Pera M, Manterola C, Vidal O et al (2005) Epidemiology of esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 92(3):151–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR et al (2008a) The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg 248(4):549–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR et al (2008b) Predicting systemic disease in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy: a multinational study on the significance of the number of involved lymph nodes. Ann Surg 248(6):979–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Portale G, Hagen JA, Peters JH et al (2006) Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. J Am Coll Surg 202(4):588–596; discussion 596–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S et al (2006) Left thoracoabdominal approach versus abdominal-transhiatal approach for gastric cancer of the cardia or subcardia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 7(8):644–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvanet A, Mariette C, Thomas P et al (2005) Mortality and morbidity after resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: predictive factors. J Am Coll Surg 201(2):253–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers JJ, van der Peet DL, Veenhof AA et al (2009) Systematic approach of postoperative gastric conduit complications after esophageal resection. Dis Esophagus 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder W, Monig SP, Baldus SE et al (2002) Frequency of nodal metastases to the upper mediastinum in Barrett’s cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 9(8):807–811

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuchert MJ, Luketich JD, Landreneau RJ et al (2008) Minimally-invasive esophagomyotomy in 200 consecutive patients: factors influencing postoperative outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 85(5):1729–1734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuhmacher C, Novotny A, Ott K et al (2007) [Lymphadenectomy with tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract]. Chirurg 78(3):203–206, 208–212, 214–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewert JR, Stein HJ (1998) Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 85(11):1457–1459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siewert JR, Holscher AH, Becker K et al (1987) [Cardia cancer: attempt at a therapeutically relevant classification]. Chirurg 58(1):25–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siewert J, Feith M, Werner M et al (2000) Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on ­anatomical/topographic classification in 1002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 232(3):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewert JR, Stein HJ, Feith M et al (2001) Histologic tumor type is an independent prognostic parameter in esophageal cancer: lessons from more than 1,000 consecutive resections at a single center in the Western world. Ann Surg 2001 234(3):360–367; discussion 368–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein HJ, Feith M, Mueller J et al (2000) Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Ann Surg 232(6):733–742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stein HJ, Bartels H, Siewert JR (2001) Esophageal carcinoma: 2-stage operation for preventing mediastinitis in high risk patients. Chirurg 72(8):881–886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tachimori Y, Kanamori N, Uemura N et al (2009) Salvage esophagectomy after high-dose chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137(1):49–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yuasa N, Miyake H, Yamada T et al (2006) Clinicopathologic comparison of Siewert type II and III adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. World J Surg 30(3):364–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul M. Schneider .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schiesser, M., Schneider, P.M. (2009). Surgical Strategies for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction. In: Schneider, P. (eds) Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 182. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70579-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70579-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70578-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70579-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics