Skip to main content

Classifi cations and Patterns of Keratoconus and Keratectasia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Quick Guide to the Management of Keratoconus

Abstract

Classification of KC is the first step in approaching the disease because the severity of the disease and the stage at which the patient is diagnosed and treated affect treatment results. KC can be classified according to the morphology of the cone and the pattern of corneal topography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alpins N, Stamatelatos G (2007) Customized photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using combined topographic and refractive data for myopia and astigmatism in eyes with forme fruste and mild keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:591–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colin J, Velou S (2003) Current surgical options for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:379–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ertan A, Colin J (2007) Intracorneal rings for keratoconus and keratectasia. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1303–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fogla R et al (2003) Keratectasia in 2 cases with pellucid marginal corneal degeneration after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:788–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenauer-Kloevekorn C et al (2006) Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration: evaluation of the corneal surface and contact lens fitting. Br J Ophthalmol 90:318–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holladay JT (2008). Detecting forme fruste keratoconus with the Pentacam. Supplement to cataract & refractive surgery today Feb: 11,12

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimian F et al (2008) Topographic evaluation of relatives of patients with keratoconus. Cornea 27:874–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubaloglu A et al (2010) A single 210-degree arc length intrastromal corneal ring implantation for the management of pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 150:185–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WW et al (2007) Ectatic disorders associated with a claw shaped pattern on corneal topography. Am J Ophthalmol 144:154–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lim L et al (2007) Evaluation of keratoconus in asians: role of orbscan II and tomey TMS-2 corneal topography. Am J Ophthalmol 143:390–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mularoni A et al (2005) Conservative treatment of early and moderate pellucid marginal degeneration. A new refractive approach with intracorneal rings. Ophthalmology 112:660–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oie Y et al (2008) Characteristics of ocular higher-order aberrations in patients with pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:1928–1934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piñero DP et al (2009) Refractive and corneal aberrometric changes after intracorneal ring implantation in corneas with pellucid marginal degeneration. Ophthalmology 116:1656–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasheed K, Rabinowitz YS (2000) Surgical treatment of advanced pellucid marginal degeneration. Ophthalmology 107:1836–1840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santo MR et al (1999) Corneal topography in asymptomatic family members of a patient with pellucid marginal degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 127:205–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinjab MM (2009) Corneal topography in clinical practice (pentacam system): basics and clinical interpretation. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sinjab MM (2010) Step by step reading pentacam topography (basics and case study series). Jaypee-Highlights Medical Publishers, New Delhi

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar MS et al (2004) Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. Ophthalmology 111:1102–1107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang M et al (2005) Characteristics of keratoconus and pellucid marginal degeneration in mean curvature maps. Am J Ophthalmol 140:993–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mazen M. Sinjab M.D., M.S., CABOphth, Ph.D. .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sinjab, M.M. (2012). Classifi cations and Patterns of Keratoconus and Keratectasia. In: Quick Guide to the Management of Keratoconus. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21840-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21840-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21839-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21840-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics