Abstract
In most environments, acoustic signals of insects are a source of high background noise levels for many birds and mammals, but at the same time, their own communication channel is noisy due to conspecific and heterospecific signalers as well. In this chapter, I first demonstrate how this situation influences communication and the evolution of related traits at the population level. Solutions for communicating under noise differ between insect taxa, because their hearing system evolved independently many times, and the signals vary strongly in the time and frequency domain. After describing some solutions from the senders’ point of view the focus of the chapter is on properties of the sensory and central nervous system, and how these properties enable receivers to detect relevant acoustic events from irrelevant noise, and to discriminate between signal variants.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amézquita A, Castellanos L, Hödl W (2005) Auditory masking of male Epipedobates femoralis (Anura: Dendrobatidae) under field conditions. Anim Behav 70:1377–1386
Amézquita A, Hödl W, Lima AP, Castellanos L, Erdtmann L, De Araújo MC (2006) Masking interference and the evolution of the acoustic communication system in the Amazonian dendrobatid frog Allobates femoralis. Evolution 60:1874–1887
Alexander RD (1962) Evolutionary change in cricket acoustical communication. Evolution 16:443–467
Alexander AJ, van Staaden MJ (1989) Alternative sexual tactics in male bladder grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Pneumoridae). In: Bruton MN (ed) Alternative life-history styles of animals. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 261–277
Altes RA, Anderson GM (1980) Binaural estimation of cross-range velocity and optimum escape manoeuvres by moths. In: Busnel RG, JF Fish (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum, New York, pp 851–852
Arak A, Eiriksson T (1992) Choice of singing sites by male bushcrickets (Tettigonia viridissima) in relation to signal propagation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:365–372
Baden T, Hedwig B (2007) Neurite specific Ca2+-dynamics underlying sound processing in an auditory interneurone. J Neurobiol 67:68–80
Bailey WJ (2003) Insect duets: underlying mechanisms and their evolution. Physiol Entomol 28:157–174
Bailey WJ, Römer H (1991) Sexual differences in auditory sensitivity: mismatch of hearing threshold and call frequency in a tettigoniid (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae: Zaprochilinae). J Comp Physiol A 169:349–353
Bateson M, Healy SD (2005) Comparative evaluation and its implication for mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 20:659–664
Bee MA, Micheyl C (2008) The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviourists study it? J Comp Psychol 122:235–251
Bennet-Clark HC (1998) Size and scale effects as constraints in insect sound communication. Phil Trans Roy Soc B 353:407–419
Boyan GS, Fullard JH (1988) Information processing at a central synapse suggests a noise filter in the auditory pathway of the noctuid moth. J Comp Physiol A 164:251–258
Brumm H, Slabberkoorn H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Study Behav 35:151–209
Buus S (1998) Auditory masking. In: Crocker MJ (ed) Handbook of acoustics. Wiley, New York, pp 1147–1165
Candolin U (2003) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev 78:575–595
Capranica RR, Moffat AJM (1983) Neurobehavioral correlates of sound communication in anurans. In: Ewert JP, Capranica RR, Ingle D (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Plenum, New York, pp 701–730
Castellano S (2009) Towards an information-processing theory of mate choice. Anim Behav 78:1493–1497
Cocroft RB, Rodriguez RL (2005) The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. Bioscience 55(4):323–334
Diwakar S, Balakrishnan R (2006) The assemblage of acoustically communicating crickets of a tropical evergreen forest in southern India: call diversity and diel calling patterns. Int J Anim Sound Record 16:1–23
Diwakar S, Balakrishnan R (2007) Vertical stratification in an acoustically communicating ensiferan assemblage of a tropical evergreen forest in southern India. J Tropical Ecol 23:479–486
Dobler S, Stumpner A, Heller K-G (1994) Sex-specific spectral tuning for the partner´s song in the duetting bushcricket Ancistrura nigrovittata (Orhtoptera: Phaneropterinae). J Comp Physiol A 175:303–310
Donelson NC, van Staaden MJ (2005) Alternate tactics in male bladder grasshoppers Bullacris membracioides (Orgtoptera: Pneumoridae). Behaviour 142:761–778
Eggermont JJ, Smith GM (1996) Burst-firing sharpens frequency tuning in primary auditory cortex. NeuroReport 7:753–757
Ellinger N, Hödl W (2003) Habitat acoustics of a neotropical lowland forest. Bioacoustics 13:297–321
Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139:125–153
Endler JA (1993) Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos Trans R Soc B 340:215–225
Endler JA, Basolo AL (1998) Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. TREE 13:415–420
Faure PA, Hoy RR (2000) Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. I. Tuning and responses to pure tones. J Exp Biol 203:3225–3242
Fenton MB, Portfors CV, Rautenbach IL, Waterman JM (1998) Compromises: sound frequencies used in echolocation by aerial-feeding bats. Can J Zool 76:1174–1182
Forrest TG (1994) From sender to receiver: propagation and environmental effects on acoustic signals. Am Zool 34:644–654
Forrest TG, Green DM (1991) Sexual selection and female choice in mole crickets (Scapteriscus: Gryllotalpidae): modelling the effects of intensity and male spacing. Bioacoustics 3:93–109
Fullard JH (1987) Sensory ecology and neuroethology of moths and bats: interactions in a global perspective. In: Fenton MB, Racey PA, Rayner JMV (eds) Recent advances in the study of bats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 244–272
Fullard JH (1998) The sensory co evolution of moths and bats. In: Hoy RR, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative hearing: insects. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 279–326
Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Gogala M, Riede K (1995) Time sharing of song activity by cicadas in Temengor Forest Reserve, Hulu Perak, and in Sabah, Malaysia. Malay Nat J 48:297–305
Greenfield MD (1983) Reproductive isolation in clearwing moths (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae): a tropical-temperate comparison. Ecology 64(2):362–375
Greenfield MD (1988) Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids Neoconocephalus: inhibition-induced shifts in diel periodicity. Anim Behav 36:684–695
Greenfield MD (1990) Evolution of acoustic communication in the genus Neoconocephalus: discontinuous songs, synchrony, and interspecific interactions. In: Bailey WJ, Rentz DCF (eds) The Tettigoniidae: biology, systematics and evolution. Crawford House Press, Bathurst, pp 71–98
Greenfield MD (1994) Synchronous and alternating choruses in insects and anurans: common mechanisms and diverse functions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:97–126
Greenfield MD, Karandinos MG (1979) Resource partitioning of the sex communication channel in clearwing moths (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) of Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 49(4):403–426
Greenfield MD, Roizen I (1993) Katydid synchronous chorusing is an evolutionary stable outcome of female choice. Nature 364:618–620
Guilford T, Dawkins MS (1991) Receiver psychology and the evolution of animals signals. Anim Behav 42:1–14
Hartbauer M, Kratzer S, Steiner K, Römer H (2005) Mechanisms for synchrony and alternation in song interactions of the bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera). J Comp Physiol 191:175–188
Hartbauer M, Radspieler G, Römer H (2010) Reliable detection of predator cues in afferent spike trains of a katydid under high background noise levels. J Exp Biol 213:3036–3046
Hartbauer M, Siegert ME, Fertschai I, Römer H (2012) Acoustic signal perception in a noisy habitat: lessons from synchronising insects. J Comp Physiol A. doi:10.1007/s00359-012-0718-1
Hedrick AV (1986) Female preference for male calling bout duration in a field cricket. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:73–77
Hedwig B, Pollack GS (2008) Invertebrate auditory pathways. In: Basbaum AI, Akimichi K, Shepard GM, Westheiner G (eds) Invertebrate auditory pathways. The senses: a comprehensive reference. Dallos P, Oertel D. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 525–564
Heller KG (1988) Zur Bioakustik der Europäischen Laubheuschrecken. Josef Margraf, Weikersheim
Heller KG, von Helversen D (1986) Acoustic communication in phaneropterid bushcrickets: species-specific delay of female stridulatory response and matching male sensory time window. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:189–198
von Helversen D (1984) Parallel processing in auditory pattern recognition and directional analysis by the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus L. (Acrididae). J Comp Physiol A 154:837–846
von Helversen D, von Helversen O (1995) Acoustic pattern recognition and orientation in orthopteran insects: parallel or serial processing. J Comp Physiol 177:767–774
Hoy RR (1992) The evolution of hearing in insects as an adaptation to predation from bats. In: Webster DB, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) The evolutionary biology of hearing. Springer, New York, pp 115–129
Huber F, Kleindienst H-U, Moore TE, Schildberger K, Weber T (1990) Acoustic communication in periodical cicadas: neuronal responses to songs of sympatric species. In: Gribakin FG, Wiese K, Popov AV (eds) Sensory systems and communication in arthropods. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 217–228
Jacobs K, Otte B, Lakes-Harlan R (1999) Tympanal receptor cells of Schistocerca gregaria: correlation of soma positions and dendrite attachment sites, central projections and physiologies. J Exp Zool 283:270–285
Johnstone RA (1997) The evolution of animal signals. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. An evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 155–178
Klump GM (1996) Bird communication in a noisy world. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. University Press, Ithaca, pp 321–338
Kostarakos K, Rheinlaender J, Römer H (2007) Spatial orientation in the bushcricket Leptophyes punctatissima (Phaneropterinae; Orthoptera). III. Peripheral directionality and central nervous spatial cues. J Comp Physiol A 193:1115–1123
Kostarakos K, Hennig M, Römer H (2009) Two matched filters and the evolution of mating signals in four species of cricket. Frontiers Zool 6:22
Krahe R, Gabbiani F (2004) Burst firing in sensory systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 24:10731–10740
Keuper A, Kühne R (1983) The acoustic behaviour of the bushcricket Tettigonia cantans. II. Transmission of air-borne sound and vibration signals in the biotope. Behav Proc 5:55–74
Lang A, Teppner I, Hartbauer M, Römer H (2005) Predation and noise in communication networks of neotropical katydids. In: McGregor P (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 152–169
Latimer W, Schatral A (1983) The acoustic behaviour of the bushcricket Tettigonia cantans. I. Behavioural responses to sound and vibration. Behav Proc 8:113–124
Libersat F, Hoy RR (1991) Ultrasonic startle behavior in bushcrickets (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol A 169:507–514
Mason AC, Morris GK, Hoy RR (1999) Peripheral frequency mismatch in the primitive ensiferan Cyphoderris monstrosa (Orthopterea: Haglidae). J Comp Physiol 184:543–551
Madsen BM, Miller LA (1987) Auditory input to motor neurones of the dorsal longitudinal flight muscles of the noctuid moth (Barathra brassicae L.). J Comp Physiol A 160:23–31
Marsat G, Pollack G (2006) A behavioral role for feature detection by sensory bursts. J Neurosci 26:10542–10547
Metzner W, Koch C, Wessel R, Gabbiani F (1998) Feature extraction by burst-like spike patterns in multiple sensory maps. J Neurosci 18:2283–2300
Miller LA, Olesen J (1979) Avoidance behaviour in green lacewings. I. Behaviour of free flying green lacewings to hunting bats and ultrasound. J Comp Physiol A 131:113–120
Miller CT, Bee MA (2012) Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach? Anim Behav 83:331–343
Moiseff A, Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1978) Steering response of flying crickets to sound and ultrasound: mate attraction and predator avoidance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:4052–4056
Morris GK, Mason AC, Wall P (1994) High ultrasonic and tremulation signals in neotropical katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J Zool Lond 233:129–163
Møller AP, Pominakowski A (1993) Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:167–176
Paez VP, Bock BC, Rand AS (1993) Inhibition of evoked calling of Dendrobates pumilio due to acoustic interference from cicada calling. Biotropica 25(2):242–245
Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–164
Payne RS, Roeder KD, Wallman J (1966) Directional sensitivity of the ears of noctuid moths. J Exp Biol 44:17–31
Pfeiffer M, Hartbauer M, Lang AB, Maass W, Römer H (2012) Probing real sensory worlds with unsupervised clustering. PLoS ONE 7:e37354
Pollack GS (1986) Discrimination of calling song models by the cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus: the influence of sound direction on neural coding of the stimulus temporal pattern and on phonotactic behaviour. J Comp Physiol 158:549–561
Pollack GS (1988) Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron. J Neurosci 8:2635–2639
Pollack GS (1998) Neural processing of acoustic signals. In: Hoy RR, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative hearing: insects. Springer, New York, pp 139–196
Pollack GS (2000) Who, what, where? Recognition and localization of acoustic signals by insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:763–767
Popov AV, Shuvalov VF (1977) Phonotactic behaviour of crickets. J Comp Physiol A 119:111–126
Poulet JFA, Hedwig B (2002) A corollary discharge maintains auditory sensitivity during sound production. Nature 418:872–876
Rheinlaender J, Römer H (1986) Insect hearing in the field. I. The use of identified nerve cells as “biological microphones”. J Comp Physiol 158:647–651
Riede K (1986) Modification of the courtship song by visual stimuli in the grasshopper Gomphocerus rufus (Acrididae). Physiol Entomol 11:61–74
Riede K (1987) A comparative study of mating behaviour in some neotropical grasshoppers (Acridoidea). Ethology 76:265–296
Robillard T, Grandcolas P, Desutter-Grandcolas L (2007) A shift toward harmonics for high-frequency calling shown with phylogenetic study of frequency spectra in Eneopterinae crickets (Orthoptera, Grylloidea, Eneopteridae). Can J Zool 85:1264–1275
Robinson D, Rheinlaender J, Hartley JC (1986) Temporal parameters of male-female sound communication in Leptophyes punctatissirna. Physiol Entomol 11:317–323
Roeder KD (1964) Aspects of the noctuid tympanic nerve response having significance in the avoidance of bats. J Insect Physiol 10:529–546
Roeder KD (1967) Nerve cells and insect behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Roeder KD, Treat AE (1962) The acoustic detection of bats by moths. In: Proceedings of the 11th international entomological conference, Wien, vol 3, pp 7–11
Römer H (1976) Die Informationsverarbeitung tympanaler Rezeptorelemente von Locusta migratoria (Acrididae, Orthoptera). J Comp Physiol 109:101–122
Römer H (1992) Ecological constraints for the evolution of hearing and sound communication in insects. In: Webster DB, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) The evolutionary biology of hearing. Springer, New York, pp 79–93
Römer H (1998) The sensory ecology of acoustic communication in insects. In: Hoy RR, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative hearing: insects. Springer handbook of auditory research. Springer, New York, pp 63–96
Römer H, Lewald J (1992) High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:437–444
Römer H, Bailey W (1998) Strategies for hearing in noise: peripheral control over auditory sensitivity in the bushcricket Sciarasaga quadrata (Austrosaginae: Tettigoniidae). J Exp Biol 201:1023–1033
Römer H, Bailey WJ, Dadour I (1989) Insect hearing in the field. III. Masking by noise. J Comp Physiol 164:609–620
Römer H, Krusch M (2000) A gain-control mechanism for processing of chorus sounds in the afferent auditory pathway of the bushcricket Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol A 186:181–191
Römer H, Lang A, Hartbauer M (2010) The signaller’s dilemma: a cost–benefit analysis of public and private communication. PLoS ONE e13325
Ronacher B, Krahe R (1998) Song recognition in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus is not impaired by shortening song signals: implications for neural encoding. J Comp Physiol A 183:729–735
Ronacher B, Hoffmann C (2003) Influence of amplitude-modulated noise on the recognition of communication signals in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. J Comp Physiol A 189:419–425
Ronacher B, Krahe R, Hennig RM (2000) Effects of signal duration on the recognition of masked communication signals by the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. J Comp Physiol A 186:1065–1072
Ronacher B, Franz A, Wohlgemuth S, Hennig R (2004) Variability of spike trains and the processing of temporal patterns of acoustic signals—problems, constraints, and solutions. J Comp Physiol A 190:257–277
Ryan MJ, Brenowitz EA (1985) The role of body size, phylogeny and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. Am Nat 126:87–100
Ryan MJ, Keddy-Hector A (1992) Directional pattern of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am Nat 139:S4–S35
Ryan MJ, Akre KI, Kirkpatrik M (2007) Mate choice (primer). Curr Biol 17:313–316
Samarra FIP, Klappert K, Brumm H, Miller PJO (2009) Background noise constrains communication: acoustic masking of courtship signals in the fruit fly Drosophila montana. Bahaviour 146:1635–1648
Schmidt AKD, Riede K, Römer H (2011) High background noise shapes selective auditory filters in a tropical cricket. J Exp Biol 214:1754–1762
Schmidt AKD, Römer H (2011) Solutions to the cocktail party problem in insects: selective filters, spatial release from masking and gain control in tropical crickets. PLoS ONE 6(12):e28593. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028593
Schul J, von Helversen D, Weber T (1998) Selective phonotaxis in Tettigonia cantans and T. viridissima in song recognition and discrimination. J Comp Physiol A 182:687–694
Schul J, Matt F, von Helversen O (2000) Listening for bats: the hearing range of the bushcricket Phaneroptera falcata for bat echolocation calls measured in the field. Proc Roy Soc Lond 267:1711–1715
Schul J, Sheridan RA (2006) Auditory stream segregation in an insect. Neuroscience 138:1–4
Sismondo E (1990) Synchronous, alternating, and phase-locked stridulation by a tropical katydid. Science 249:55–58
Sobel EC, Tank DW (1994) In vivo Ca2+ dynamics in a cricket auditory neuron: an example of chemical computation. Science 263:823–826
Sueur J (2002) Cicada acoustic communication: potential sound partitioning in a multispecies community from Mexico (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha: Cicadidae). Biol J Linn Soc 75:379–394
van Staaden MJ, Römer H (1997) Sexual signalling in bladder grashoppers: tactical design for maximizing calling range. J Exp Biol 200:2597–2608
Stumpner A, Allen GR, Lakes-Harlan R (2007) Hearing and frequency dependence of auditory interneurons in the parasitoid fly Homotrixa alleni (Tachinidae: Ormiini). J Comp Physiol A 193:1113–1125
Thiele DR, Bailey WJ (1980) The function of sound in male spacing behavior of buschcrickets (Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera). Aust J Ecol 5:275–286
Walker TJ (1969) Acoustic synchrony: two mechanisms in the snowy tree cricket. Science 166:891–894
Waters DA (1996) The peripheral auditory characteristics of noctuid moths: information encoding and endogenous noise. J Exp Biol 199:857–868
Waters DA, Jones G (1994) Wingbeat-generated ultrasound in noctuid moths increases the discharge rate of the bat-detecting A1 cell. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:41–46
Wehner R (1989) “Matched filters”—neural models of the external world. J Comp Physiol A 161:511–531
Wyttenbach RA, May ML, Hoy RR (1996) Categorical perception of sound frequency by crickets. Science 273:1542–1544
Yager DD (1999) Structure, development, and evolution of insect auditory systems. Microsc Res Tech 47:380–400
Zelick R, Narins PM (1985) Characterization of the advertisement call oscillator in the frog Eleutherodacytylus coqui. J Comp Physiol 156:223–229
Zhantiev RD, Dubrovin NN (1977) Sound communication in the genus Isophya (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) (in Russian). Zool Zurnal 56:40–51
Zuk M, Kolluru GR (1998) Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Quart Rev Biol 73:415–438
Acknowledgments
I acknowledge the comments of Mark Bee, Henrik Brumm and an anonymous reviewer, which greatly improved the chapter. My own research on the sensory ecology of acoustic communication in insects was strongly influenced by collaboration with Jürgen Rheinlaender and Win Bailey, who focused my interest on field work and evolutionary aspects of acoustic signaling and hearing. I also thank M. van Staaden, G.K. Morris, I. Dadour, and D. Gwynne for numerous discussions during our field work. Own research for this article was supported by grants from the Austrian Science Foundation FWF, projects P09523-BIO and P20882-B09.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Römer, H. (2013). Masking by Noise in Acoustic Insects: Problems and Solutions. In: Brumm, H. (eds) Animal Communication and Noise. Animal Signals and Communication, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41494-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41494-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41493-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41494-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)