Skip to main content

Settling the Score with Class IIs Using Miniscrews

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices

Abstract

Class IIs have been one of the most prevalent malocclusions treated in orthodontic practice. Throughout the history of the specialty, all manner of methods and devices have been employed to resolve these bad bites. Yet, after decades, there is still no consensus on the best technique or approach. In fact, we seemingly cannot even agree on the etiology nor the correct jaw to address with our mechanics. It does appear that we might find common ground regarding the most common issues with any of our treatment approaches, namely, that we are constrained by two major limitations: the requirements of patient compliance and anchorage control. It is this interminable battle for compliance and anchorage that has led us to employ skeletal anchorage for the management of Class IIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Johnston Jr LE. A comparative analysis of Class II treatment methods. In: McNamara Jr JA, Carlson DS, Vig PS, Ribbens KA, editors. Science and clinical judgment in orthodontics, Craniofacial growth series. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan; 1986. p. 103–48.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burkhardt DR, McNamara Jr JA, Baccetti T. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:108–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsourakis AK, Johnston Jr LE. Class II malocclusion: the aftermath of a “perfect storm.” Semin Orthod. 2014;20:59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. O’Brien K, Sandler J. The treatment of Class II malocclusion-have we the evidence to make decisions? In: Huang GJ, Richmond S, Vig KWL, editors. Evidence-based orthodontics. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. p. 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghafari JG, Haddad RV, Saadeh ME. Class III malocclusion-the evidence on diagnosis and treatment. In: Huang GJ, Richmond S, Vig KWL, editors. Evidence-based orthodontics. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. p. 247–80.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vig KWL, O’Brien K, Harrison J. Early orthodontic and orthopedic treatment: the search for evidence: will it influence clinical practice? In: Early orthodontic treatment: is the benefit worth the burden? Craniofacial growth series, vol. 44. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 2007. p. 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnston Jr LE. If wishes were horses. In: McNamara Jr JA, editor. Early orthodontic treatment: is the benefit worth the burden, Craniofacial growth series, vol. 44. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 2007. p. 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Livieratos FA, Johnston Jr LE. A comparison of one-stage and two-stage nonextraction alternatives in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108(2):118–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnston Jr LE. Growth and the Class II patient: rendering unto Caesar. Semin Orthod. 1998;4(1):59–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chatzigianni A, Keilig L, Reimann S, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:381–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:42–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Beialy AR, Abou-El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AM, Mostafa YA. Loss of anchorage of miniscrews: a 3-dimensional assessment. Am J Dentofac Orthop. 2009;136(5):700–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alves Jr M, Baratieri C, Nojima LI. Assessment of mini-implant displacement using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(10):1151–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kinzinger GSM, Diedrich PR, Bowman SJ. Upper molar distalization with a miniscrew-supported Distal Jet. J Clin Orthod. 2006;40:672–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pangrazio MNK, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Bayirli B, Movahhedian A. Treatment effects of the mandibular repositioning appliance in patients with Class II skeletal malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:971–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Franchi L, Pavoni C, Kaltin Jr K, McNamara Jr JA, Cozza P. Long-term skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:334–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnston Jr LE. Functional appliances: a mortgage on mandibular position. Aust Orthod J. 1996;14:154–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mellion ZJ, Behrents RG, Johnston Jr LE. The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143(6):845–54. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dugoni SA, Lee JS, Varela J, Dugoni AA. Early mixed dentition treatment: post retention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:311–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gianelly AA. A strategy for nonextraction Class II treatment. Semin Orthod. 1998;4:26–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bowman SJ. Thinking outside the box with mini-screws. In: McNamara Jr JA, Ribbens KA, editors. Microimplants as temporary anchorage in orthodontics, Craniofacial growth series. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan; 2008. p. 327–90.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ludwig B, Baumgartel S, Bowman SJ, editors. Mini-implants in orthodontics: innovative anchorage concepts. Berlin: Quintessence; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sonis A, Ackerman M. E-space preservation. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(6):1045–9. doi:10.2319/030711-165.1. Epub 2011 May 25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rubin RL, Baccetti T, McNamara Jr JA. Mandibular second molar eruption difficulties related to the maintenance of arch perimeter in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(2):146–52. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lundström A, McWilliam JS. Dento-alveolar compensation for antero-posterior variations between the upper and lower apical bases. Eur J Orthod. 1984;6:116–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Kim LH. Effect of timing on the outcome of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(4):501–9. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bechtold TE, Kim JW, Choi TH, Park YC, Lee KJ. Distalization pattern of the maxillary arch depending on the number of orthodontic miniscrews. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:266–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jeon JM, Yu HS, Baik HS, Lee JS. En-masse distalization with miniscrew anchorage in Class II nonextraction treatment. J Clin Orthod. 2006;40(8):472–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hansen K, Koutsonas TG, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment on the mandibular incisor segment: a cephalometric and biometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:92–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nalbantgil D, Arun T, Sayinsu K, Isik F. Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:426–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rothenberg J, Campbelll ES, Nanda R. Class II correction with the twin force bite corrector. J Clin Orthod. 2004;38:232–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. LeHaye MB, Buschang PH, Alexander RG, Boley JC. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(6):732–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ye C, Du X, Zhao Q, Tan Z. Dentoskeletal effects of 2-phase treatment versus 1-phase treatment with extraction of 4 first premolars in nonhypodivergent class II patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(5):1544–7. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824f6454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bowman SJ. Class II combination therapy: molar distalization and fixed functionals. In: Nanda R, Kapila S, editors. Current therapy in orthodontics. St. Louis: Elsevier/Mosby; 2009. p. 115–36.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Luzi C, Luzi V, Carletti P, Melsen B. The miniscrew-anchored Herbst. J Clin Orthod. 2012;46(7):399–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bowman SJ. Miniscrew molar distalization: evolution of the Horseshoe Jet. In: Papadopoulos MS, editor. Skeletal anchorage in orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion: contemporary applications of orthodontic implants, miniscrew implants and miniplates. Mosby (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fudalej P, Antoszewska J. Are orthodontic distalizers reinforced with the temporary anchorage devices effective? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:722–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kinzinger G, Wehrbein H, Byloff FK, Yildizhan F, Didrich P. Innovative anchorage alternatives for molar distalization: an overview. J Orofac Orthop. 2005;66:397–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chang H, Hsiao H, Tsai C, Roberts WE. Bone-screw anchorage for Pendulum appliances and other fixed mechanics. Semin Orthod. 2006;12:284–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Velo S, Rotunno E, Cozzani M. The implant Distal Jet. J Clin Orthod. 2007;41:88–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gelgör IE, Büyükyilmaz T, Karaman AIY, Dolanmaz D, Kalayci A. Intraosseous screw-supported upper molar distalization. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:838–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Carano A, Velo S. The miniscrew anchorage system. In: Cope J, editor. OrthoTADs: the clinical guide and atlas. Dallas: Under Dog Media; 2007. p. 231–43.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Papadopoulos MA. Orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion with miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(5):604.e1–16. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.013; discussion 604–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Jay Bowman DMD, MSD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowman, S.J. (2014). Settling the Score with Class IIs Using Miniscrews. In: Kim, K. (eds) Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55052-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55052-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55051-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55052-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics