Skip to main content

Evaluation Research on Correctional Treatment in West Germany: A Meta-analysis

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Research in Criminology ((RESEARCH CRIM.))

Abstract

Compared with the United States and several West European countries, the institutionalization of treatment for criminals is only a relatively recent development in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG). In 1969 § 65 StGB (Strafgesetzbuch; Penal Law) on placement in a sociotherapeutic prison was introduced as a major legal basis and one of the major advances in penal reform. The goal of this legislation was that the courts would order placement in a sociotherapeutic prison for the following groups of prisoners:

  1. 1.

    Recidivists with serious personality disorders

  2. 2.

    Dangerous sexual offenders

  3. 3.

    Young adult criminals who have been assessed as especially crime-prone

  4. 4.

    Criminally nonresponsible or reduced responsibility offenders, if placement in a sociotherapeutic prison would appear to provide a better opportunity for resocialization than treatment in a psychiatric clinic

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akers, R. L., Gruninger, W., & Hayner, N. (1976). Prison inmate roles: interorganizational and cross-cultural comparisons. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 4, 365–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, W. C. (1966). Correctional outcome: An evaluation of 100 reports. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 57, 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1986). Review of developments in meta-analytic method. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 388–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. S. (1985). The Perry preschool program and its long-term effects: a benefit-cost analysis. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, D., & Richter, H. E. (1972). Gießen-Test (GT). Handbuch. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. (1984). Der dänische Strafvollzug — die weithin unbemerkte Wende. Zeitschrift für Strafvollzug und Straffälligenhilfe, 33, 140–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blass, W. (1983). Evaluation im Strafvollzug. Überblick und Kritik vorliegender Studien. In H. Kury (Ed.), Methodische Probleme der Behandlungsforschung, insbesondere in der Sozialtherapie(pp. 81–120 ). Cologne: Heymanns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, R. J., & Svyantek, D. J. (1985). Analyzing meta-analysis: potential problems, an unsuccessful replication and evaluation criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 108–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1981). Limits to pain. Oxford: Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences( 2nd ed. ). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrado, R. R. (1981). Using experiments in evaluating delinquency prevention programs. In R. Roesch & R. R. Corrado (Eds.), Evaluation and criminal justice policy(pp. 17–28 ). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S.M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D.C., Walker, D.F., & Weiner, S. S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolde, G. (1982). Effizienzkontrolle sozialtherapeutischer Behandlung im Vollzug. In H. Göppinger & P. H. Bresser (Eds.), Sozialtherapie. Kriminologische Gegenwartsfragen: Vol. 15 (pp. 47 — 64 ). Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driebold, R., Egg, R., Nellessen, L., Quensel, S., & Schmitt, G. (1984). Die Sozialtherapeutische Anstalt. Modelle für Empfehlungen für den Justizvollzug. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dünkel, E (1980). Sozialtherapeutische Behandlung und Rückfälligkeit in Berlin-Tegel. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dünkel, E (1983). Methodische Probleme der Effizienzforschung bei Behandlungsmaßnahmen im Strafvollzug, insbesondere in der Sozialtherapie. In H. Kury (Ed.), Methodische Probleme der Behandlungsforschung, insbesondere in der Sozialtherapie(pp. 121–147 ). Cologne: Heymanns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dünkel, F. (1987). Die Herausforderung der geburtenschwachen Jahrgänge. Aspekte der Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse in der Kriminalpolitik. Freiburg i. Br., FRG: Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dünkel, F., Nemec, R., & Rosner, A. (1985). Organisationsentwicklung und Behandlungsmaßnahmen in einer sozialtherapeutischen Anstalt. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript. Freiburg i. Br., FRG: Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egg, R. (1984). Straffälligkeit und Sozialtherapie. Cologne: Heymanns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerik, J. V. (1982). Einige Ergebnisse der Nachuntersuchung von ehemaligen Patienten der Dr. Henri van-der-Hoeven-Kliniek in Utrecht. Zeitschrift für Strafvollzug und Straffälligenhilfe, 31, 339–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrenberg, J., Selg, H., & Hampel, R. (1978). Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar (FPI). Handanweisung( 3rd ed. ). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1983). Randomized experiments on crime and justice. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice. An annual review of research: Vol. 4 (pp. 257–308 ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, R., & Treinies, G. (1985). Einführung in die Meta Analyse. Bern: Huber. Friedman, H. (1968). Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its rapid estimation. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. R. (1980). Effective correctional treatment: bibliotheraphy for cynics. In R. R. Ross & P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment(pp. 3–36 ). Toronto: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, D. (1983). Towards a cost/benefit assessment of Dutch penal policies. The Hague: Research and Documentation Center of the Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., & Kliegl, R. M. (1983). An apology for research integration in the study of psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 28–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grawe, K. (1987). Die Effekte der Psychotherapie. In M. Amelang (Ed.), Bericht über den 35. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Heidelberg 1986: Vol. 2 (pp. 515 - 534 ). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesener, B., & Jehle, J. M. (1987). Bevölkerungsbewegung und Strafvollzugsbelegung. Die künftige Entwicklung des Strafvollzugs unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der demo-graphischen Entwicklung. Wiesbaden, FRG: Kriminologische Zentralstelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, E. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Interview with Martinson. (1978, December 9). Criminal Justice Newsletter, 9, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, G. (1986). Aktuelle Ergebnisse kriminologischer Forschung. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht, 103, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, G., Dünkel, F., & Ortmann, R. (1982). Die sozialtherapeutische Anstalt–das Ende einer Reform? Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, 15, 198–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kury, H. (Ed.). (1983). Methodische Probleme der Behandlungsforschung, insbesondere der Sozialtherapie. Cologne: Heymanns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kury, H. (1986). Die Behandlung Straffälliger: Vol. 1. Inhaltliche und methodische Probleme der Behandlungsforschung. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejins, P.P. (1982). Maßnahmen zur Behandlung abnormer Täter–Erfahrungsbericht aus den USA. In H. Göppinger & P. H. Bresser (Eds.), Sozialtherapie. Kriminologische Gegenwartsfragen: Vol. 15 (pp. 7–31 ). Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leviton, L. C., & Hughes, E. F. (1981). Research on the utilization of evaluations: a review and synthesis. Evaluation Review, 5, 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, D., Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C. (1972) Criminology. Evaluation research in crime and delinquency: a reappraisal. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 63, 378–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lösel, E (Ed.). (1983). Kriminalpsychologie. Weinheim, FRG: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösel, F. (1987). Methodik und Problematik von Meta-Analysen–mit Beispielen der Psychoatherapieforschung. Gruppendynamik, 18, 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösel, E, & Nowack, W. (1987). Evaluationsforschung. In J. Schultz-Gambard (Ed.), Angewandte Sozialpsychologie(pp. 57–87 ). Munich: Psychologie-Verlags-Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • L?sel, F., K?ferl, P., & Weber, F. (1987). Meta-Evaluation der Sozialtherapie Stuttgart: nke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N. (1974). The future of imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Neu, A. (1974). Die finanziellen Auswirkungen des Alternativ-Entwurfs. In J. Baumann (Ed.), Die Reform des Strafvollzugs(pp. 145–164). Munich: Goldmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, R. (1987). Resozialisierung im Strafvollzug Freiburg i. Br., FRG: Max-Planck-In-stitut für ausl?ndisches und internationales Strafrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posavac, E. J., & Carey, R. G. (1980). Program evaluation. Methods and case studies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, H. C. (1977). The three faces of evaluation: What can be expected to work? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 4, 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehn, G. (1979). Behandlung im Strafvollzug. Weinheim, FRG: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezmovic, E. L. (1979). Methodological considerations in evaluating correctional effectiveness: issues and chronic problems. In L. B. Sechrest, S. O. White, & E. D. Brown (Eds.), The rehabilitation of criminal offenders: problems and prospects(pp. 163–209 ). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romig, A. D. (1978). Justice for our children. An examination of juvenile delinquent rehabilitation programs. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1983). Assessing the statistical and social importance of the effects of psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 4–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt. G. (1981). Sozialtherapie im Überblick. In Bundeszusammenschluß für Straffälligenhilfe (Ed.), Sozialtherapie als kriminalpolitische Aufgabe(pp. 123–165 ). Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüler-Springorum, H. (1986). Die sozialtherapeutischen Anstalten - ein kriminalpolitisches Lehrstück. In H. J. Hirsch, G. Kaiser, & H. Marquardt (Eds.), Gedchtnisschrift für Hilde Kaufmann (pp. 167–188). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sechrest, L. B., & Yeaton, W. H. (1982). Assessing the effectiveness of social programs: methodological and conceptual issues. Evaluation Studies, 2, 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sechrest, L. B., White, S. O., & Brown, E. D. (Eds.). (1979). The rehabilitation of criminal offenders: problems and prospects. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D.A., & Shapiro, D. (1982). Meta-analysis of comparative therapy outcome studies: a replication and refinement. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 581–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D.A., & Shapiro, D. (1983). Comparative therapy outcome research: methodological implications of meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 42–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32, 752–760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, W., Van der Plaats, L. K., & Niemantsverdriet, J. R. (1983). Die Behandlung psychisch gestörter Straftäter in der van-der-Hoeven-Kliniek in Utrecht. In R. Driebold (Ed.), Strafvollzug(pp. 153–166 ). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo, G., & Griswold, D. (1979). Issues in the measurement of recidivism. In L. B. Sechrest, S. O. White, & E. D. Brown (Eds.), The rehabilitation of criminal offenders: problems and prospects(pp. 225–250 ). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, L. (1978). “Treatment” on trial: the case of Patuxent. In N. Johnston & L. Savitz (Eds.), Justice and corrections(pp. 670–687). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, A.D., Woodbury, D.F., Smith, S.H., Barreto, H., & Beaton, R. (1983). The effects of a less coercive internal prison environment and gradual re-integration on post-release performance: an evaluation of Morris model of imprisonment as implemented at the Federal Correctional Institution at Butner D.C. Report for the Bureau of Prisons, July 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, W. W., & Matt, G.E. (1986). Meta-Analyse als Integration von Forschungsergebnissen am Beispiel deutschsprachiger Arbeiten zur Effektivität von Psychotherapie. Psychologische Rundschau, 37, 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis. Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lösel, F., Köferl, P. (1989). Evaluation Research on Correctional Treatment in West Germany: A Meta-analysis. In: Wegener, H., Lösel, F., Haisch, J. (eds) Criminal Behavior and the Justice System. Research in Criminology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86017-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86017-1_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-86019-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-86017-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics