Abstract
Most everyday goods can be more or less private in consumption. For example, a family may share one bathroom or may enjoy the luxury of one bathroom per person in which case the good has been completely privatized. Even such “personal” goods as haircuts may be shared in the sense that family members take turns getting a haircut rather than having their hair cut whenever they individually decide to do so. Thus, even haircuts may be privatized in consumption. There is a definite trend towards increasing privatization in consumption with increasing income. The paradox I would like to discuss in this paper can be summarized as follows: by increasing privacy in consumption, people seemingly also destroy something they cannot replace by their own efforts: certain forms of social approval. They seemingly act in such a way that they increase their own deprivation with regard to these forms of social approval.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Becker, G.S. (1976). “A theory of social interaction”. In G.S. Becker, The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: 253–282.
Hirsch, F. (1978). Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, Mass. Kahn, A. (1966). “The tyranny of small decisions”. Kyklos: 23–46.
Lindenberg, S. (1979). “Solidaritätsnormen und soziale Struktur”, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Section for Theoretical Sociology of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie, mimeo.
Lindenberg, S. (1982), “Sharing groups: theory and suggested applications”. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 9: 33–62
Lindenberg, S. (1984). “Normen und die Allokation sozialer Wertschätzung”. In H. Todt (ed.), Normgeleitetes Verhalten in den Sozialwissenschaften. Berlin: 169–191.
Opp, K.D., (1985). Die Entstehung sozialer Normen. Tübingen: Mohr.
Ouchi, W. (1980). “Markets, bureaucracies, and clans”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 129–141.
Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and Loving. New York.
Ullmann-Margalit, E (1977). The Emergence of Norms. Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lindenberg, S. (1986). The Paradox of Privatization in Consumption. In: Diekmann, A., Mitter, P. (eds) Paradoxical Effects of Social Behavior. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95874-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95874-8_21
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0350-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95874-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive