Skip to main content

Economic Considerations in the Provision of Treatments for Rare Diseases

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rare Diseases Epidemiology

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 686))

Abstract

Orphan Drug legislation in the USA, Europe and elsewhere has been incredibly successful in promoting the development of new treatments for rare diseases. Historically, payers have constructed special schemes that have facilitated patient access given the small total budget impact of these treatments. However, whilst each disease is rare, the number of licensed orphan drugs is growing rapidly. This, in conjunction with the high prices claimed for these treatments, has increased the total budget impact of orphan drugs. In the medium term, the feasibility of omitting orphan drugs from value for money type assessments is doubtful. The arguments for a special status for orphan drugs in reimbursement processes are reviewed in this article, and it is concluded that these arguments do not generally stand up to critical assessment. A new paradigm for the development and purchase of orphan drugs may be required. Given the strong parallels between the challenges of neglected diseases in developing countries and orphan diseases in developed countries, policy tools developed for neglected diseases; such as Public Private Partnerships and Advance Market Commitments, might be fruitfully applied in the orphan drug arena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Briggs A, Sculpher M, Claxton K (2006) Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chilcott J, McCabe C, Tappenden P, O’Hagan A, Cooper NJ, Abrams K, Claxton K, (2003) Modelling the cost effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the management of multiple sclerosis. BMJ 326:522–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Connock M, Burls A, Frew E, Fry-Smith A, Juarez-Garcia A, McCabe C, Wailoo A, Abrams K, Cooper N, Sutton A, O’hagan A, Moore D (2006) The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher’s Disease. Health Technol Assess 10(24):1–152

    Google Scholar 

  4. Council of the European Union (2009) Council Recommendation on action in the field of rare diseases. Luxembourg. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/lsa/108383.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2009

  5. Department of Health and Ageing (1995) Guidelines to the pharmaceutical industry on preparation of submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee including major submissions involving economic analyses. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing: Canberra. http://www.pbs.gov.au/html/industry/static/how_to_list_on_the_pbs/elements_of_the_listing_process/pbac_guidelines/b_part_2/section_f Accessed 24/6/2010

  6. Department of Health HSS 2002/004 (2002) Cost effective provision of disease modifying therapies for people with multiple sclerosis. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drummond MF, Wilson DA, Kanavos P, Ubel P, Rovira J (2007) Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 23:36–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Drummond MF (2007) Challenges in the economic evaluation of orphan drugs. Pharmaceutical policy. Eurohealth 14(2):16–17

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.g. Gennzyme Corporation (2009) Patient Assistance Program. http://rxassistorg/pap-info/company_detail.cfmCmpID=114. Accessed 15 October 2009

  10. Food and Drug Administration (2009) Orphan drug act (as amended). http://www.fda.gov/orphan/oda.htm

  11. Grace C (2006) Developing new technologies to address neglected diseases: the role of Product Development Partnerships and Advanced Marked Commitments. DFID Health Resource Centre DFID, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes DA, Tunnage B, Yeo S (2005) Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: do they deserve special status for funding? QJM 98(11):829–836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. The International Collaborative Gaucher Group (ICGG) Gaucher Registry (2009) Gaucher Registry. http://www.lsdregistry.net/gaucherregistry/ Accessed 24/6/2010

  14. KCE Policies for Orphhan Diseases and Orphan Drugs (2009) KCE Report 112C. Belgian Healht Care Knowledge Centre, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCabe C, Claxton K, Tsuchiya A (2005) Orphan drugs and the NHS: should we value rarity? BMJ 331:1016–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McCabe C, Stafinski T, Edlin R, Menon D. Access with evidence development: a framework for description and evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics 28(2):143–152

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miles KA, Packer C, Stevens A (2007) Quantifying emerging drugs for rare conditions. QJM 100:291–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2007) Appraising Orphan Drugs Formal Response to Department of Health NICE, London. http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/pdf/smt/120705item4.pdf Accessed 24/6/2010

  19. National Specialist Commissioning Advisory Group (2007) Policy on the funding of enzyme replacement therapy and substrate reduction therapy. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of December 16, 1999 on orphan medicinal products (2000) Official Journal of the European Communities 43(L18):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  21. Williams A (1997) Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the ‘fair innings’ argument. Health Economics 6(2):117–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher McCabe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCabe, C., Edlin, R., Round, J. (2010). Economic Considerations in the Provision of Treatments for Rare Diseases. In: Posada de la Paz, M., Groft, S. (eds) Rare Diseases Epidemiology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 686. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics