Abstract
I began working on what I now call the new rhetoric with only a vague idea of what it was about, with no intention to become a rhetorician.1 As a logician, I was interested in the study of reasoning, especially reasoning about values. I wanted to develop a logic of value judgments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See for more details: ‘The new rhetoric, a theory of practical reasoning’ in The Great Ideas Today, 1970, Encyclopaedia Briiannica. 1970, pp. 273–312.
See Perelman, Ch. and Olbrochts-Tyteca, L.: 1969, The New Rhetoric-A Treatise on Argumentation, Notre Dame University Press, p. 113.
See Perelman, Ch.: The new rhetoric, a theory of practical reasoning, p. 291.
Sec Giuliani. A.: 1966, La controversla, contributo alia logica giuridica, Pavia.
See Pcrclman, Ch.: 196S, ‘Le raisonnement pratique’ in R. Klibansky (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy, Florence, La Nuova Italia, Vol. 1, pp. 168–76.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1971 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Perelman, C. (1971). The New Rhetoric. In: Bar-Hillel, Y. (eds) Pragmatics of Natural Languages. Synthese Library, vol 41. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1713-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1713-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0599-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1713-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive