Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Medicine ((ASBP,volume 71))

Abstract

This paper begins by reviewing some main concerns about the inadequacies of dominant theoretical approaches to bioethics in the last century. These concerns have led to increasing pressure to search for alternative frameworks and new paradigms to guide heath care and biomedical decision making which do not cast caring and justice as two oppositional and irreconciliable moral requirements. The paper examines three alternative frameworks: feminist care ethics, agent-based virtue ethics, and Chinese Confucian ethics and analyses how they can provide a different orientation for framing and developing alternative systems of bioethics. It concludes that these three ethical perspectives can provide foundations for a new bioethics which is more sensitive and more responsive to the moral ideal of ‘just caring’ than current mainstream impartialist or principle-based approaches. The paper argues for the importance for bioethical discourse to engage seriously with these three ethical perspectives in order to move away from the dualism and reductionism of the current American dominant paradigm of bioethics, which cannot be the global bioethics for the new century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Au, D.K.S. (2000). Brain Injury, Brain Degeneration, and Loss of Personhood. In: Gerhold Becker (ed.), The Moral Status of Persons: Perspectives on Bioethics (pp. 209–218 ). GA: Amsterdam-Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T., Childress, J. (1990). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 3rd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blustein, J. (1991). Care and Commitment: Taking the Personal Point of View, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. (1993). Why America Accepted Bioethics. Hastings Centre Report, 23 (Suppl.), S8 - S9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. Y. (1993). An Ethic of Loving: Ethical Particularism and the Engaged Perspective in Confucian Role-Ethics, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, J. (1998). A Principle-based Approach. In: Helga Kushe, Peter Singer (Eds.), A Companion to Bioethics (pp. 61–71). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1987). Beyond Caring: the Demoralization of Gender. In: M. Hanen, K. Nielsen (Eds.), Science, Morality, and Feminist Theory (pp. 87–110 ). Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (1993). Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschmann, N. (1992). Rethinking Obligation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1651)(1991). Leviathan,R. Tuck (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785) (1987). Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals, T. L. Abbott (trans.). Buffalo: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. (1998). Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care Trust and Empathy. London: Routledge. Lau, D.C. (trans.). (1979). Confucius: The Analects. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D.C. (trans.). (1988). Mencius. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A Feminist Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, J. (1998). A Virtue-ethics Approach. In: Helga Kushe, Peter Singer (Eds.), A Companion to Bioethics (pp. 86–97). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullman, D. (1999). The Ethics of Autonomy and Dignity in Long-Term Care. Canadian Journal on Aging, 18 (1), 26–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, R. (2000). Medicine–the Art of Humaneness: On Ethics of Traditional Chinese Medicine. In: Robert M. Veatch (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives in Medical Ethics (pp. 292–307 ), ( 2nd ed. ). Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M. (1998). The Justice of Caring. In: E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller, Jeffrey Paul (Eds.), Virtue and Vice (pp. 171–195 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, J. (2000). Two Perspectives of Care: Confucian Ren and Feminist Care. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 27 (2), 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1981). The Tyranny of Principles. Hastings Centre Report, 10 (2), 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unschuld, P. U. (1979). Medical Ethics in Imperial China - A Study in Historical Anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Po-Wah, J.T.L. (2002). Is Just Caring Possible? Challenge to Bioethics in the New Century. In: Po-Wah, J.T.L. (eds) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im)Possibility of Global Bioethics. Philosophy of Medicine, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1195-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1195-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5969-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1195-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics