Abstract
This paper begins by reviewing some main concerns about the inadequacies of dominant theoretical approaches to bioethics in the last century. These concerns have led to increasing pressure to search for alternative frameworks and new paradigms to guide heath care and biomedical decision making which do not cast caring and justice as two oppositional and irreconciliable moral requirements. The paper examines three alternative frameworks: feminist care ethics, agent-based virtue ethics, and Chinese Confucian ethics and analyses how they can provide a different orientation for framing and developing alternative systems of bioethics. It concludes that these three ethical perspectives can provide foundations for a new bioethics which is more sensitive and more responsive to the moral ideal of ‘just caring’ than current mainstream impartialist or principle-based approaches. The paper argues for the importance for bioethical discourse to engage seriously with these three ethical perspectives in order to move away from the dualism and reductionism of the current American dominant paradigm of bioethics, which cannot be the global bioethics for the new century.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Au, D.K.S. (2000). Brain Injury, Brain Degeneration, and Loss of Personhood. In: Gerhold Becker (ed.), The Moral Status of Persons: Perspectives on Bioethics (pp. 209–218 ). GA: Amsterdam-Atlanta.
Beauchamp, T., Childress, J. (1990). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 3rd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Blustein, J. (1991). Care and Commitment: Taking the Personal Point of View, New York: Oxford University Press.
Callahan, D. (1993). Why America Accepted Bioethics. Hastings Centre Report, 23 (Suppl.), S8 - S9.
Chan, S. Y. (1993). An Ethic of Loving: Ethical Particularism and the Engaged Perspective in Confucian Role-Ethics, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
Childress, J. (1998). A Principle-based Approach. In: Helga Kushe, Peter Singer (Eds.), A Companion to Bioethics (pp. 61–71). Oxford: Blackwell.
Friedman, M. (1987). Beyond Caring: the Demoralization of Gender. In: M. Hanen, K. Nielsen (Eds.), Science, Morality, and Feminist Theory (pp. 87–110 ). Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Held, V. (1993). Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hirschmann, N. (1992). Rethinking Obligation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1651)(1991). Leviathan,R. Tuck (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1785) (1987). Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals, T. L. Abbott (trans.). Buffalo: Prometheus Books.
Koehn, D. (1998). Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care Trust and Empathy. London: Routledge. Lau, D.C. (trans.). (1979). Confucius: The Analects. London: Penguin.
Lau, D.C. (trans.). (1988). Mencius. New York: Penguin.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A Feminist Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Oakley, J. (1998). A Virtue-ethics Approach. In: Helga Kushe, Peter Singer (Eds.), A Companion to Bioethics (pp. 86–97). Oxford: Blackwell.
Pullman, D. (1999). The Ethics of Autonomy and Dignity in Long-Term Care. Canadian Journal on Aging, 18 (1), 26–46.
Qiu, R. (2000). Medicine–the Art of Humaneness: On Ethics of Traditional Chinese Medicine. In: Robert M. Veatch (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives in Medical Ethics (pp. 292–307 ), ( 2nd ed. ). Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Slote, M. (1998). The Justice of Caring. In: E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller, Jeffrey Paul (Eds.), Virtue and Vice (pp. 171–195 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tao, J. (2000). Two Perspectives of Care: Confucian Ren and Feminist Care. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 27 (2), 215–240.
Toulmin, S. (1981). The Tyranny of Principles. Hastings Centre Report, 10 (2), 31–39.
Unschuld, P. U. (1979). Medical Ethics in Imperial China - A Study in Historical Anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Po-Wah, J.T.L. (2002). Is Just Caring Possible? Challenge to Bioethics in the New Century. In: Po-Wah, J.T.L. (eds) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im)Possibility of Global Bioethics. Philosophy of Medicine, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1195-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1195-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5969-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1195-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive