Abstract
Several different explanations of policy change based on notions of learning have emerged in the policy literature to challenge conventional conflict-oriented theories. These include notions of ‘political-learning’ developed by Heclo, ‘policy-oriented learning’ developed by Sabatier, ‘lesson-drawing’ analyzed by Rose, ‘social learning’ discussed by Hall and ‘government learning’ identified by Etheredge. These different concepts identify different actors and different effects with each different type of learning. Some elements of these theories are compatible, while others are not. This article examines each approach in terms of who learns, what they learn, and the effects of learning on subsequent policies. The conclusion is that three distinct types of learning have often been incorrectly juxtaposed. Certain conceptual, theoretical and methodological difficulties attend any attempt to attribute policy change to policy learning, but this does not detract from the important reorientation of policy analysis that this approach represents.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, Charles W. (1979). ‘The place of principles in policy analysis,’ American Political Science Review 73: 711–723.
Argyris, C. and D. Schon (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Bennett, Colin and Michael Howlett (1991). ‘When states learn do they change? American lessons, Canadian learning and the conceptualization of policy change.’ A paper presented to the Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association.
Bennett, Colin J. (1991). ‘What is policy convergence and what causes it?’ British Journal of Political Science 21: 215–234.
Bennett, Colin J. (1992a). ‘The international regulation of personal data: From epistemic community to policy sector.’ A paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association.
Bennett, Colin J. (1992b). Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Castles, Francis G. (1990). ‘The dynamics of policy change: What happened to the English-speaking nations in the 1980s’ European Journal of Political Research 18: 491–513.
Dexter, Lewis (1973). Elite and Specialized Interviewing. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Etheredge, Lloyd M. and James Short (1983). ‘Thinking about government learning,’ Journal of Management Studies 20: 41–58.
Etheredge, Lloyd S. (1981). ‘Government learning: An overview,’ in S. L. Long, ed., The Handbook of Political Behavior, Vol 2. New York: Pergamon.
Evans, P. B., D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol, eds. (1988). Bringing the State Back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haas, Ernst B. (1990). When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Haas, Peter M. (1992). ‘Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination,’ International Organization 46: 1–36.
Hall, Peter A. (1988). ‘Policy paradigms, social learning and the state,’ a paper presented to the International Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
Hall, Peter A. (1989). ‘Conclusion: The political power of economic ideas,’ in P. A. Hall, ed., The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 361–392.
Heclo, Hugh (1974). Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Heclo, Hugh (1978). ‘Issue networks and the executive establishment,’ in A. King, ed., The New American Political System. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, pp. 87–124.
Heintz, H. Theodore and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith (1988). ‘Advocacy coalitions and the practice of policy analysis,’ Policy Sciences 21: 263–277.
Hernes, Gudmund (1976). ‘Structural change in social processes,’ American Journal of Sociology 82: 513–547.
Hogwood, Brian W. and B. Guy Peters (1983). Policy Dynamics. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
Holzner, Burkhart and John H. Marx (1979). Knowledge Application: The Knowledge System in Society. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Imershein, Allen W. (1977). ‘Organizational change as a paradigm shift,’ The Sociological Quarterly 18: 33–43.
Jenson, Jane (1989). ‘Paradigms and political discourse: Protective legislation in France and the United States before 1914,’ Canadian Journal of Political Science 22: 235–258.
Kuhn, Thomas (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lindblom, Charles E. and D. K. Cohen (1979). Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lindquist, Evert A. (1990). ‘Learning and change in policy communities: A research agenda for the literature.’ A paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association.
Lynn, L., ed. (1978). Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection. Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
Mitchell, Timothy (1991). ‘The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics’ American Political Science Review 85: 79–96.
Moore, Mark H. (1988). ‘What sorts of ideas become public ideas?’ in R. B. Reich, ed., The Power of Public Ideas, Cambridge: Ballinger, pp. 55–83.
Nordlinger, Eric (1981). On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Polsby, Nelson W. (1984). Political Innovation in America: The Politics of Policy Initiation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rose, Richard (1988). ‘Comparative policy analysis: The program approach,’ in M. Dogan, ed., Comparing Pluralist Democracies, Boulder: Westview Press.
Rose, Richard (1991). ‘What is lesson-drawing.’ Journal of Public Policy 11: 3–30.
Ruggie, John Gerard (1975). ‘International responses to technology: Concepts and trends,’ International Organization 29: 557–584.
Sabatier, Paul (1978). ‘The acquisition and utilization of technical information by administrative agencies,’ Administrative Sciences Quarterly 6: 386–411.
Sabatier, Paul (1987). ‘Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change,’ Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8: 649–692.
Sabatier, Paul A. (1988). ‘An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein,’ Policy Sciences 21: 129–168.
Sartori, Giovanni (1968). ‘Concept misformation in comparative politics,’ American Political Science Review 64: 1033–1053.
Shrivastava, Paul (1983). ‘A typology of organizational learning systems.’ Journal of Management Studies 20: 7–28.
Walker, Jack L. (1974). ‘The diffusion of knowledge and policy change: Toward a theory of agenda-setting.’ A paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Weiss, Carol (1977a). ‘Research for policy's sake: The enlightenment function of social research.’ Policy Analysis 3: 531–545.
Weiss, Carol (1977b). Using Social Research in Public Policy-Making. Lexington: D. C. Heath.
Wilks, Stephen and Maurice Wright (1987). ‘Conclusion: Comparing government-industry relations: States, sectors, and networks,’ in S. Wilks and M. Wright, eds. Comparative Government-Industry Relations: Western Europe, the United States, and Japan. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 274–313.
Wright, Maurice (1988). ‘Policy community, policy network and comparative industrial policies,’ Political Studies 36: 593–612.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bennett, C.J., Howlett, M. The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sci 25, 275–294 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138786
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138786