Skip to main content
Log in

Memory dynamics and foraging strategies of honeybees

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The foraging behavior of a single bee in a patch of four electronic flower dummies (feeders) was studied with the aim of analyzing the informational components in the choice process. In different experimental combinations of reward rates, color marks, odors and distances of the feeders, the behavior of the test bee was monitored by a computer in real time by several devices installed in each feeder. The test bee optimizes by partially matching its choice behavior to the reward rates of the feeders. The matching behavior differs strongly between “stay” flights (the bee chooses the feeder just visited) and “shift” flights (the bee chooses one of the three alternative feeders). The probability of stay and shift flights depends on the reward sequence and on the time interval between successive visits. Since functions describing the rising probability of stay flights with rising amounts of sucrose solution just experienced differ for the four feeders, it is concluded that bees develop feeder-specific memories. The choice profiles of shift flights between the three alternative feeders depend on the mean reward rate of the feeder last visited. Good matching is found after visits to the low-reward feeders and poor matching following departure from the high-reward feeders. These results indicate that bees use two different kinds of memories to guide their choice behavior: a transient short-term working memory that is not feeder-specific, and a feeder-specific long-term reference memory. Model calculations were carried out to test this hypothesis. The model was based on a learning rule (the difference rule) developed by Rescorla and Wagner (1972), which was extended to the two forms of memories to predict this operant behavior. The experiments show that a foraging honeybee learns the properties of a food source (its signals and rewards) so effectively that specific expectations guide the choice behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buttel-Reepen H (1900) Sind die Bienen Reflexmaschinen? Exp Beitr Biol Honigbiene 20:1–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Couvillon PA, Bitterman ME (1985) Analysis of choice in honeybees. Anim Learn Behav 13:246–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preference. Am Nat 100:611–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Forel A (1910) Das Sinnesleben der Insekten. Reinhardt, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch K von (1914) Der Farbensinn und Formensinn der Biene. Zool Jb Physiol 37:1–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch K von (1965) Tanzsprache und Orientierung der Bienen. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1972) Energetics of temperature regulation and foraging in a bumblebee, Bombus terricola. J Comp Physiol 77:49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1975) Energetics of pollination. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 6:139–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979) “Majoring” and “minoring” by foraging bumblebees, Bombus vagans: an experimental analysis. Ecology 60:245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979) Resource heterogenity and patterns of movement in foraging bumblebees. Oecologia 40:235–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1981) The energetics of pollination. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 68:370–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1983) Do bumblebees forage optimally, and does it matter? Am Zool 23:273–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1984) Learning in Invertebrates. In: Marler P, Terrace HS (eds) The biology of learning (Dahlem Konferenzen). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 135–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B, Mudge PR, Deringis PG (1977) Laboratory analysis of flower constancy in foraging bumblebees: Bombus ternarius and B. terricola. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:247–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ (1970) On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav 13:243–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamil AC, Roitblat HL (1985) The ecology of foraging behavior: implications for animal learning and memory. Annu Rev Psychol 36:141–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer M (1963) Allgemeine Sinnesphysiologie. Orientierung im Raum. Fortschr Zool 16:58–140

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RE, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Marden JH, Waddington KD (1981) Floral choices by honeybees in relation to the relative distances to flowers. Physiol Entomol 6:431–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1967) Untersuchungen zum Erlernen von Spectralfarben durch die Honigbiene (Apis mellifera). Z Vergl Physiol 56:22–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1985) Learning in honey bees in an ecological and behavioral context. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1987) Memory traces in honeybees. In: Menzel R, Mercer A (eds) Neurobiology and behavior of honeybees. Springer, Berlin, pp 310–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1990) Learning, memory, and “cognition” in honey bees. In: Kesner RP, Olten DS (eds) Neurobiology of comparative cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, pp 237–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunez JA (1970) The relationship between sugar flow and foraging and recruiting behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Anim Behav 18:527–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflumm W (1984) Rate of supply of the sugar solution and behavior of the nectar gathering honeybee — a comparison between natural and artificial food sources. Zool Jb Physiol 88:457–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1978) Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences. Theor Popul Biol 13:72–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1978) Optimal foraging in bumblebees and coevolution with their plants. Oecologia 36:281–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Real LA (1991) Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitive architecture. Science 253:980–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla RA, Wagner AR (1972) A theory of classical conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In: Black AH, Prokasy WF (eds) Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 64–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P (1984) The importance handling time for the flight directionality in bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:303–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P (1985) How do bees choose flight direction while foraging? Physiol Entomol 10:439–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P (1987) Efficient nectar-collecting by honeybees. J Anim Ecol 56:209–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P, Kacelnik A, Houston AI (1985) Honeybees maximize efficiency by not filling their crop. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P, Wolf TJ (1988) Foraging effort and life span of workers in a social insect. J Anim Ecol 57:509–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1985) The information-center strategy of honeybee foraging. Fortschr Zool 31:75–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Staddon JE (1983) Adaptive behavior and learning. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1991) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., pp 1–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton RS, Barto AG (1981) Towards a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction. Psychol Rev 88(2):135–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Varju D, Nunez J (1991) What do foraging honeybees optimize? J Comp Physiol 169:729–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington KD (1982) Honey bee foraging profitability and round dance correlates. J Comp Physiol 148:297–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington KD (1985) Cost-intake information used in foraging. J Insect Physiol 31:891–889

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington KD (1990) Foraging profits and thoracic temperature of honey bees (Apis mellifera). J Comp Physiol 160:325–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington KD, Gottlieb N (1990) Actual vs percieved: a study of floral choice of honey bees. J Insect Behav 3:429–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington KD, Heinrich B (1981) Patterns of movement and floral choice by foraging bees. In: Kamil A, Sargent T (eds) Foraging behavior. Garland Press, New York, pp 215–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington KD, Holden LR (1979) Optimal foraging: on flower selection by bees. Am Nat 114:179–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf TJ, Schmid-Hempel P, Ellington CP, Stevenson RD (1989) Physiological correlates of foraging efforts in honey-bees: oxygen consumption and nectar load. Funct Ecol 3:417–424

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: R. Menzel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greggers, U., Menzel, R. Memory dynamics and foraging strategies of honeybees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32, 17–29 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172219

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172219

Keywords

Navigation