Skip to main content
Log in

Stress radiography in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency

  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A prospective study was carried out to test the sensitivity and specificity of stress radiography in detecting anterior cruciate ligament deficiency in both knees of 116 patients using the Telos device. In 47 of these a total or partial rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament was diagnosed by arthroscopy, while the ligament was intact in the remaining 69 patients. The mean difference in radiological translation between the injured and the normal knee was greater than 5 mm (p<0.001) in those with anterior cruciate deficiency, and less than 3 mm in the others. A differential displacement of up to 3 mm was considered normal. The sensitivity of the method was less than 67% and the specificity was 100%. Clinical diagnosis had a sensitivity of 70.2% and a specificity of 98.5%. Our findings suggest that, although a differential translation of more than 3 mm can be diagnostic, smaller differences do not rule out anterior cruciate deficiency.

Résumé

Les auteurs ont réalisé une étude prospective pour évaluer la sensibilité et la spécificité des radiographies en position forcée dans le diagnostic des insuffisances du ligament croisé antérieur (LCA). Une radiographie en tiroir forcé des deux genoux a d'abord été faite, en utilisant l'appareil Telos, chez 116 patients devant subir une arthroscopie unilatérale. Chez 47 de ces patients une rupture totale ou partielle du LCA a été confirmée par arthroscopie, qui a montrée un ligament intact chez les 69 autres. La différence moyenne de translation entre le genou blessé et le genou sain a été supérieure à 5 mm (p<0.001) chez les patients ayant une insuffisance du LCA et inférieure à 3 mm chez les autres (une différence de 3 mm a été considérée comme normale). La sensibilité de la méthode a été de moins de 67% et le spécificité de 100%. L'examen clinique a une sensibilité de 70.2% et une spécificité de 98.5%. Ces résultats permettent de penser que, bien qu'une translation supérieure à 3 mm puisse avoir une valeur diagnostique, une moindre différence n'exclut pas une insuffisance du ligament croisé antérieur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson A, Snyder R, Federspiel C, Lipscomb B (1992) Instrumented evaluation of knee laxity: a comparison of five arthrometers. Am J Sport Med 20: 135–140

    Google Scholar 

  2. Daniel D, Stone M (1990) Instrumented measurement of knee motion. In: Daniel D, Akelson W, O'Connor J (eds) Knee ligaments: structure, function, injury and repair. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel D, Malcolm L, Lose G, Stone M, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67: 720–726

    Google Scholar 

  4. Franklin J, Rosenberg T, Paulos L, France P (1991) Radiographic assessment of instability of the knee due to rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 73: 365–372

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hooper G (1986) Radiological assessment of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68: 292–296

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iversen B, Stürup J, Jacobsen K, Andersen J (1989) Implications of muscular defense in testing for the anterior drawer sign in the knee. Am J Sports Med 17: 409–413

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jakobsen K (1976) Stress radiographical measurement of anteroposterior, medial and lateral stability of the knee joint. Acta Orthop Scand 47: 335–344

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lerat J, Moyen B, Jenny J, Perrier J (1993) A comparison of pre-operative evaluation of anterior knee laxity by dynamic X-rays and by the arthrometer KT 100. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy 1: 54–59

    Google Scholar 

  9. Markolf K, Mensch J, Amstutz H (1976) Stiffness and laxity of the knee — the contributions of the supporting structures: a quantitative in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 58: 583–594

    Google Scholar 

  10. Markolf K, Kochan A, Amstutz H (1984) Measurement of knee stiffness and laxity in patients with documented absence of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66: 242–253

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oberlander M, Shalvoy R, Hughston J (1993) The accuracy of the clinical knee examination documented by arthroscopy: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 21: 773–778

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shino K, Inoue M, Horibe S, Nakamur H, Ono K (1987) Measurement of anterior instability of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69: 608–613

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stäubli HU (1990) Stress radiography. In: Daniel D, Akelson W, O'Connor J (eds) Knee ligaments: structure, function, injury and repair. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stäubli HU, Jakob R (1991) Knee symposium. Anterior knee motion analysis: measurement and simultaneous radiography. Am J Sport Med 19: 172–177

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stäubli H, Noesberger B, Jakob R (1992) Stress radiography of the knee. Acta Orthop Scand 63: 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  16. Torzilli P, Greenberg R, Hood R, Pavlov H, Insall J (1984) Measurement of anterior-posterior motion of the knee in injured patients using a biomechanical stress technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66: 1438–1442

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcés, G.L., Perdomo, E., Guerra, A. et al. Stress radiography in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. International Orthopaedics 19, 86–88 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00179966

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00179966

Keywords

Navigation