Abstract
Background: This paper compares the costs of disposable and reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods: The instrument set considered includes those instruments that are available in both a reusable and disposable form. A market study within the Belgian market was performed in order to compare purchase prices. In addition, costs of cleaning, sterilization, wrapping, maintenance, repair, and disposal of waste were calculated. The effects of reusables and disposables were examined by means of a literature overview.
Results: It was calculated that the instrument cost per procedure of a full disposable set is 7.4–27.7 times higher than the cost per procedure with reusables. In comparison with disposables, modular systems (“semidisposable”) and mixed use of disposables and reusables reduce costs, but still the cost per procedure remains higher than with reusables. A sensitivity analysis confirmed that these conclusions are robust to the model assumptions. In addition, the available evidence in the literature suggests that reusables do not compromise patient or staff safety.
Conclusions: If reusables are used instead of disposables when performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, considerable savings can be achieved without compromising patient and staff safety.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Airan M, Appel M, Berci G, Coburg AJ, Cohen M, Cuschieri A, Dent T, Duppler D, Easter D, Greene F, Halevey A, Hammer S, Hunter J, Jenson M, Ko ST, McFadyan B, Perissat J, Ponsky J, Ravindranatham P, Sackier JM, Soper N, Van Stiegmann G, Traverso W, Udwadia T, Unger S, Wahlstrom E, Wolfe B (1992) Retrospective and prospective multi-institutional laparoscopic cholecystectomy study organized by the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 6: 169–176
Apelgren KN, Blank ML, Slomski CA, Hadjis NS (1994) Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 8: 32–34
Bass EB, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD (1993) Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 466–471
Begos DG, Modlin IM (1994) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from gimmick to gold standard. J Clin Gastroenterol 19: 325–330
CCOHTA (1994) Reuse of medical devices, proceedings, October 6–7, Montréal, Canada, 47 pp
Corson SL, Batzer FR, Gocial G, Maislin G (1989) Measurement of the force necessary for laparoscopic trocar entry. J Repord Med 34: 282–284
Crist DW, Gadacz TR (1993) Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 73: 265–289
Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165: 9–14
Duppler DW (1992) Laparoscopic instrumentation, videoimaging, and equipment disinfection and sterilization. Surg Clin North Am 72: 1021–1031
Gadacz TR (1992) Comparison of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 24: 730–732
Galanti F, Bissi O, Gajani R, Sassi F, Mor C, Del Vecchio M (1994) A cost-analysis: traditional versus videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endosurg 2: 86–94
Hill DJ (1994) Complications of the laparoscopic approach. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 8: 865–879
Kesteloot K, Penninckx F (1993) The costs and effects of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Health Economics 2: 303–312
Larson GM, Vitale GC, Casey J, Evans JS, Gilliam G, Heuser L, McGee G, Rao M, Scherm MJ, Voyles CR (1992) Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients. Am J Surg 163: 221–226
MacFadyen BV, Lenz S (1994) The economic considerations in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 8: 748–752
Nezhat FR, Silfen SL, Evans D, Nezhat C (1991) Comparison of direct insertion of disposable and standard reusable laparoscopic trocars and previous pneumoperitoneum with veress needle. Obstet Gynecol 78: 148–150
Oshinsky GS, Smith AD (1992) Laparoscopic needles and trocars: an overview of designs and complications. J Laparoendoscop Surg 2: 117–125
Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Gutt C, Morawe G, Encke A (1995) Einmaloder wiederverwendbare Instrumente in der laparoskopischen Chirurgie- eine kontrollierte Untersuchung. Zentralbl Chir 120: 47–52
Schlumpf R, Klotz HP, Wehrli H, Herzog U (1994) A nation's experience in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 8: 35–41
Ure BM, Lefering R, Troidl H (1995) Costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Analysis of potential savings. Surg Endosc 9: 401–406
Voyles CR (1993) Reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments. Am Coll Surg: Bulletin 18: 38–39
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Demoulin, L., Kesteloot, K. & Penninckx, F. A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 10, 520–525 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188399
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188399