Skip to main content
Log in

Severe sciatica: a 13-year follow-up of 342 patients

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study involved 342 patients hospitalized because of severe, persistent sciatica suggestive of a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. After standard clinical evaluation. EMG and myelography, 220 patients underwent lumbar discectomy. The remaining 122 patients were treated conservatively. Follow-up examinations were arranged after 1, 5 and 13 years. The study focused on the rehabilitation outcome in general and differences in outcome between the two treatment groups. Several indicators showed a rather poor outcome for sciatica patients during the 13-year follow-up period. In the operated group 16% had been re-operated because of lumbar disc herniation. True recurrence of herniation (same level and side) occurred in 8%. In the conservatively treated group 14% had undergone spinal surgery. Nearly 70% of the patients still reported sciatica. Self-assessed levels of low back pain were “no change/worse” for 19% in the operated group and for 44% in the conservatively treated group. In both the study groups, nearly 40% of the subjects had retired on disability pensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alaranta H, Hurme M, Miettinen M-L (1986) Handicap 1 year following surgery for lumbar disc herniation: special reference to social and vocational factors. Int J Rehabil Med 8:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alaranta H, Hurme M, Einola S, Falck B, Kallio V, Knuts L-R, Lahtela K, Torma T (1990) A prospective study of patients with sciatica. A comparison between conservatively treated patients and patients who have undergone operation. II. Results after one year follow-up. Spine 15:1345–1349

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergquist-Ullman M, Larsson U (1977) Acute low back pain in industry. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl]: 170

  4. Biering-Sorensen F, Thomsen CE, Hilden J (1989) Risk indicators for low back trouble. Scand J Rehabil Med 21:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deyo RA, Bass JE (1989) Lifestyle and low back pain. The influence of smoking and obesity. Spine 14:501–506

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dzioba R, Doxey N (1984) A prospective investigation into the orthopaedic and psychologic predictors of outcome of first lumbar surgery following industrial injury. Spine 9:614–623

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feeley TM, Longe LG, Ellis W (1984) Results of surgery for prolapsed intervertebral disc. Irish Med J 77:72–74

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frank A (1993) Low back pain. BMJ 306:901–909

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frymoyer JW (1988) Back pain and sciatica. N Engl J Med 318:291–300

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hakelius A (1970) Prognosis in sciatica: a clinical follow-up of surgical and non-surgical treatment. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl]: 129

  11. Hasue M, Fujiwara M (1979) Epidemiologic and clinical studies of long-term prognosis of low-back pain and sciatica. Spine 4:150–155

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heliovaara M, Knekt P, Aromaa A (1987) Incidence and risk factors of herniated lumbar intervetebral disc or sciatica leading to hospitalization. J Chron Dis 40:251–258

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the results of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12: 933–938

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hurme M, Alaranta H, Törmä T, Einola S (1983) Operated lumbar disc herniation: epidemiological aspects. Ann Chir Gynaccol 72:33–36

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hurme M, Alaranta H, Einola S, Falck B, Kallio V, Knuts L-R, Lahtela K, Torma T (1990) A prospective study of patients with sciatica. A comparison between conservatively treated patients and patients who have undergone operation. I. Patient characteristics and differences between groups. Spine 15:1340–1344

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hurme M, Katevuo K, Nykvist F, Aalto T, Alaranta H, Einola S (1991) CT five years after myelographic diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation. Acta Radiol 32:286–289

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson EW, Fletcher FR (1981) Lumbosacral radiculopathy: review of 100 consecutive cases. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 62: 321–323

    Google Scholar 

  18. Korres DS, Loupassis G, Stamos K (1992) Results of lumbar discectomy: a study using 15 different evaluation methods. Eur Spine J 1:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leong JCY, Chun SY, Grange WJ, Fang D (1983) Long-term results of lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse. Spine 8:793–799

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nykvist F, Hurme M, Alaranta H, Einola S (1989) A prospective 5-year follow-up study of 276 patients hospitalized because of suspected lumbar disc herniation. Int Disabil Stud 11: 61–67

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nykvist F, Knuts L-R, Alaranta H, Hurme M, Torma T, Ronnemaa T, Kallio V (1990) Clinical, social and psychological factors and outcome in a 5-year follow-up study of 276 patients hospitalized because of suspected lumbar disc herniation. Int Disabil Stud 12:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pearce J, Moll JMH (1967) Conservative treatment and natural history of acute lumbar disc lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 30:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  23. Salenius P, Laurent LE (1977) Results of operative treatment of lumbar disc herniation: survey of 886 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 48:630–634

    Google Scholar 

  24. SAS (1990) SAS user's guide: statistics, version 6. SAS Inst, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smyth H, Gallagher J, McManus F (1983) Surgery in lumbar disc protrusion—a long-term follow-up. Irish Med J 76:25–26

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spangfort EV (1972) The lumbar disc herniation: a computeraided analysis of 2504 operations. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl]: 142

  27. Waddell G, Kummel EG, Lotto WN, Graham JD, Hall H, McCulloch JA (1979) Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 61:201–207

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weber H (1978) Lumbar disc herniation: a prospective study of prognostic factors including a controlled trial. I. J Oslo City Hosp 28:33–64

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weber H (1978) Lumbar disc herniation. A prospective study of prognostic factors including a controlled trial. II. J Oslo City Hosp 28:89–120

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8:131–140

    Google Scholar 

  31. Working Group on Back Pain (1979) Report to Secretary of State for Social Services, Secretary of State for Scotland. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nykvist, F., Hurme, M., Alaranta, H. et al. Severe sciatica: a 13-year follow-up of 342 patients. Eur Spine J 4, 335–338 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300292

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300292

Key words

Navigation